Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese condoms too small for South Africans
http://news.yahoo.com/chinese-condoms-too-small-south-africans-report-103954238.html ^

Posted on 09/17/2011 4:31:37 PM PDT by dit_xi

A South African court has blocked the government from buying 11 million Chinese condoms, saying they are too small, a newspaper reported Friday.

The finance ministry had awarded a contract to a firm called Siqamba Medical, which planned to buy the Phoenurse condoms from China, the Beeld newspaper said.

A rival firm, Sekunjalo Investments Corporation, turned to the High Court in Pretoria after losing the bid, arguing that their condoms were 20 percent larger than the Chinese ones.

Judge Sulet Potterill blocked the deal with Siqamba, ruling that the condoms were too small, made from the wrong material, and were not approved by the World Health Organisation, the paper said.

South Africa has more HIV infections than any country in the world, with 5.38 million of its 50 million people carrying the virus.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Humor; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: china; chinese; condoms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: SeaHawkFan

Reminds me of an old joke
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Of course one of them has to be...
take these balloons and mark them all small.


21 posted on 09/17/2011 4:59:20 PM PDT by xrmusn ((6/98) If govt involved, the more outlandish a scheme appears, the truer it probably is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dit_xi
Africans? If they are related to Obama...check the size and the sexual orientation. Lot's of exaggeration from folks on that continent.

Can I get me a Chrysler that "looks" like a Bentley?

22 posted on 09/17/2011 5:00:30 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
Anyone,regardless of race, born in South Africa is an African!
23 posted on 09/17/2011 5:12:02 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dit_xi

I also heard the Chinese condoms are flavored: melamine, or lead.


24 posted on 09/17/2011 5:16:52 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

I’m... reasonably certain that there’s no way this is true.


25 posted on 09/17/2011 5:24:38 PM PDT by OnlyTurkeysHaveLeftWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
"It's TWWWUUUEEE!!!"

The next line was cut, but it was "Lady, you're licking my elbow..."

26 posted on 09/17/2011 5:26:50 PM PDT by jonascord (Politicians should be pelted with human manure, weekly, to remind them of their worth to society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dit_xi

The South African GOVERNMENT is buying 11 million condoms? I’d like to see the guy who tries to put one on a lion or elephant.


27 posted on 09/17/2011 5:34:48 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dit_xi

In the face of this decision, China should just pull out.


28 posted on 09/17/2011 5:35:03 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Diverging widely from the mean does correlate well with lower intelligence as well as other genetic maladies, for instance crossed eyes and very large breasts in women. This implies inbreeding to some extent, perhaps traceable to founder effects, the so called genetic bottlenecks.

Wide divergence from the mean doesn't only apply to a physical attribute that is much larger, though, it applies to much smaller as well.

29 posted on 09/17/2011 5:38:34 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dit_xi

The Chinese tried to give them the shaft. The Africans couldn’t tell until they put their magnifying glasses on.


30 posted on 09/17/2011 5:40:31 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dit_xi

ruling that the condoms were too small, *made from the wrong material*, and were not approved by the World Health Organisation, the paper said.

One only wonders what knockoff material they’re using in the production process. It could well be that, aside from sizing issues, they are ineffective against STD’s as well.


31 posted on 09/17/2011 5:40:43 PM PDT by DemforBush (Serpentine, Shel! Serpentine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Speaking of old jokes: (Insert photo of Algore)
Saw him on the news last night...looked like a robot, his face all plasticy looking.


32 posted on 09/17/2011 5:47:55 PM PDT by Imnidiot (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OnlyTurkeysHaveLeftWings

I seen a label on a hand sanitizer the other day that said, “Kills 99.99% of most harmful germs.”

I was not impressed.


33 posted on 09/17/2011 5:52:13 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Make your choice ! There are NO civilians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dit_xi

I heard a true story from back in the seventies. As a propaganda stunt, the Soviets sent an order to an American company for a bunch of condoms. The Soviets gave the specifications for the condoms as if they were to fit enormous members. The American company filled the order with the condoms made to exact specifications. They marked all the boxes “Medium”.


34 posted on 09/17/2011 5:52:48 PM PDT by Blogatron (Brought to you by The American Frog Council; 'Frog - The other green meat')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Very large breasts in women is a genetic malady? Well, Mr. Carson sure skipped that part in biology class. Gregor Mendel Shmegor Mendel. Ohhh, think of the lab work. I would’ve stayed awake for that.


35 posted on 09/17/2011 5:58:10 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dit_xi

SIze of their military make up for the lacking of something else.......


36 posted on 09/17/2011 6:03:38 PM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

No, crossed eyes would be the malady. Very large in this instamce would likely be in the painful burden category for the women themselves, none would ever want implants to have breasts of that size.

Correlation is not an absolute. It implies a possibility of causation. The two datapoints are closely associated.


37 posted on 09/17/2011 6:05:44 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

OK. Maybe not biology class. But enroll me in the statistics class that’s checking for the mean of women’s breast size! “I’m sorry ladies, but I lost the measurements again. Shirts off!” They wouldn’t even have to pay me for that job.


38 posted on 09/17/2011 6:13:09 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
I also heard the Chinese condoms are flavored: melamine, or lead

I thought the flavored ones were condomints?

39 posted on 09/17/2011 6:14:56 PM PDT by mikrofon (This story merits on-going coverage...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
Government grant money has been fueling very narrow expeditions into areas that some might find titillating for many decades. It sometimes appears that the chief titillatees are the researchers themselves.

I'm surprised that you're surprised.

40 posted on 09/17/2011 6:21:53 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson