Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graphene shows unusual thermoelectric response to light
MIT ^ | 10/7/11 | David L. Chandler

Posted on 10/07/2011 11:42:34 AM PDT by LibWhacker

Finding could lead to new photodetectors or energy-harvesting devices.

Graphene, an exotic form of carbon consisting of sheets a single atom thick, exhibits a novel reaction to light, MIT researchers have found: Sparked by light’s energy, the material can produce electric current in unusual ways. The finding could lead to improvements in photodetectors and night-vision systems, and possibly to a new approach to generating electricity from sunlight.

This current-generating effect had been observed before, but researchers had incorrectly assumed it was due to a photovoltaic effect, says Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, an assistant professor of physics at MIT and senior author of a new paper published in the journal Science. The paper’s lead author is postdoc Nathaniel Gabor; co-authors include four MIT students, MIT physics professor Leonid Levitov and two researchers at the National Institute for Materials Science in Tsukuba, Japan.

Instead, the MIT researchers found that shining light on a sheet of graphene, treated so that it had two regions with different electrical properties, creates a temperature difference that, in turn, generates a current. Graphene heats inconsistently when illuminated by a laser, Jarillo-Herrero and his colleagues found: The material’s electrons, which carry current, are heated by the light, but the lattice of carbon nuclei that forms graphene’s backbone remains cool. It’s this difference in temperature within the material that produces the flow of electricity. This mechanism, dubbed a “hot-carrier” response, “is very unusual,” Jarillo-Herrero says.

Such differential heating has been observed before, but only under very special circumstances: either at ultralow temperatures (measured in thousandths of a degree above absolute zero), or when materials are blasted with intense energy from a high-power laser. This response in graphene, by contrast, occurs across a broad range of temperatures all the way up to room temperature, and with light no more intense than ordinary sunlight.

The reason for this unusual thermal response, Jarillo-Herrero says, is that graphene is, pound for pound, the strongest material known. In most materials, superheated electrons would transfer energy to the lattice around them. In the case of graphene, however, that’s exceedingly hard to do, since the material’s strength means it takes very high energy to vibrate its lattice of carbon nuclei — so very little of the electrons’ heat is transferred to that lattice.

Because this phenomenon is so new, Jarillo-Herrero says it is hard to know what its ultimate applications might be. “Our work is mostly fundamental physics,” he says, but adds that “many people believe that graphene could be used for a whole variety of applications.”

But there are already some suggestions, he says: Graphene “could be a good photodetector” because it produces current in a different way than other materials used to detect light. It also “can detect over a very wide energy range,” Jarillo-Herrero says. For example, it works very well in infrared light, which can be difficult for other detectors to handle. That could make it an important component of devices from night-vision systems to advanced detectors for new astronomical telescopes.

The new work suggests graphene could also find uses in detection of biologically important molecules, such as toxins, disease vectors or food contaminants, many of which give off infrared light when illuminated. And graphene, made of pure and abundant carbon, could be a much cheaper detector material than presently used semiconductors that often include rare, expensive elements.

The research also suggests graphene could be a very effective material for collecting solar energy, Jarillo-Herrero says, because it responds to a broad range of wavelengths; typical photovoltaic materials are limited to specific frequencies, or colors, of light. But more research will be needed, he says, adding, “It is still unclear if it could be used for efficient energy generation. It’s too early to tell.”

“This is the absolute infancy of graphene photodetectors,” Jarillo-Herrero says. “There are many factors that could make it better or faster,” which will now be the subject of further research.

Philip Kim, an associate professor of physics at Columbia University who was not involved in this research, says the work represents “extremely important progress toward optoelectric and energy-harvesting applications” based on graphene. He adds that because of this team’s work, “we now have better understanding of photo-generated hot electrons in graphene, excited by light.”

The research was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, along with grants from the National Science Foundation and the Packard Foundation.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Science
KEYWORDS: cell; electricity; graphene; light; panel; photography; photovoltaic; solar; stringtheory

1 posted on 10/07/2011 11:42:48 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Getting back to the waves v. particles debate


2 posted on 10/07/2011 11:44:10 AM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Bump


3 posted on 10/07/2011 11:49:47 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
This is NOT a good scientific description of what is occurring:
The material’s electrons, which carry current, are heated by the light, but the lattice of carbon nuclei that forms graphene’s backbone remains cool.
I could speculate, probably accurately about what is meant, but that's only because I've studied solid state physics and worked with carbon.
4 posted on 10/07/2011 11:53:43 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus

Someones trolling for Green Energy funding.


5 posted on 10/07/2011 11:56:53 AM PDT by ully2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The more I read about graphene and graphane, the more exciting it looks. And the more diverse its impact on our daily lives appears to be.


6 posted on 10/07/2011 11:59:31 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
disgronification in italics

But more research will be needed, he says, adding, “It is still unclear if it could be used for efficient energy generation. It’s too early to tell.” I could use the help of an experienced grant writer - the best would be one with experience as a Washington lobbiest ...

“This is the absolute infancy of graphene photodetectors,” Jarillo-Herrero says. “There are many factors that could make it better or faster,” which will now be the subject of further research. This could be hugh - maybe a whole department under me! me! me!

Philip Kim, an associate professor of physics at Columbia University who was not involved in this research, says the work represents “extremely important progress toward optoelectric and energy-harvesting applications” based on graphene. He adds that because of this team’s work, “we now have better understanding of photo-generated hot electrons in graphene, excited by light.” Everybody else can kiss my petutie - I am from COLUMBIA U and I am way out ahead on this gravy train! Tenure here I come - woo hoo!

7 posted on 10/07/2011 12:04:41 PM PDT by frithguild (We admitted we were powerless over government - that out lives had become unmanageable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Bazinga!


8 posted on 10/07/2011 12:15:17 PM PDT by edge10 (Obama lied, babies died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Light is the Certs™ of physical phenomena. It’s a wave. It’s a particle.


9 posted on 10/07/2011 12:20:58 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Bump


10 posted on 10/07/2011 12:28:03 PM PDT by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...

Thanks LibWhacker. Decimon, how did you miss this one? ;")

· String Theory Ping List ·
Periodic Table of Rejected Elements
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


11 posted on 10/08/2011 12:56:52 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Decimon, how did you miss this one?

You know, I saw this and knew I could bust your chops with grapheeeeene but forgot all about it.

12 posted on 10/08/2011 1:38:25 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson