Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: Obama eligible to be Georgia candidate
birther-report ^ | February 3, 2012 | birth report

Posted on 02/03/2012 4:45:34 PM PST by satan69

Judge: Obama eligible to be Georgia candidate

A state administrative law judge on Friday flatly rejected challenges seeking to keep President Barack Obama from being a candidate in next month's Georgia primary.

In a 10-page order, Judge Michael Malihi dismissed one challenge that contended Obama has maintained a Hawaiian birth certificate that is a computer-generated forgery, has a fraudulent Social Security number and invalid U.S. identification papers. He also turned back another that claimed the president is not a natural born citizen.

Last month, Malihi heard testimony and took evidence in a hearing boycotted by Obama's lawyer.

With regard to the challenge that Obama does not have legitimate birth and identification documents, Malihi said he found the testimony presented by lawyers of the so-called "birther" movement and their evidence "to be of little, if any, probative value and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs' allegations."

A number of the witnesses who testified about the alleged fraud were never qualified as experts in birth records, forged documents and document manipulation, Malihi wrote. "None of the testifying witnesses provided persuasive testimony," he wrote.

MORE HERE: http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/judge-obama-eligible-to-1330300.html

Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: certifigate; court; ga; georgia; judge; malihi; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2012 4:45:46 PM PST by satan69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: satan69

I’m not surprised.

zero’s thugs and threats got to him!


2 posted on 02/03/2012 4:49:15 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Obama has a protector... Lucifer...


3 posted on 02/03/2012 4:50:43 PM PST by Breto (The Establishment party is killing our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: satan69

But Sheriff Arpaio’s posse is going to have qualified expert witnesses.


4 posted on 02/03/2012 4:52:58 PM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satan69

Mark Hatfield, one of the attorneys who, along with Van Irion, focused on the issue of the definition of “natural born citizen,” said the judge ignored the issue of burden of proof.

“If Obama has the burden of proof, and failed to show up, clearly he didn’t carry the burden,” he told WND. “The judge here completely ignores that.”

He also noted it was highly unusual for a judge to reach into another state’s repository of court rulings to fetch something that would be supportive of the result when the U.S. Supreme Court itself has made a determination.

He said he’s hoping the Georgia secretary of state will evaluate the issue carefully, but he’s prepared to take the dispute to the appeals level.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/judge-says-obama-can-be-on-georgia-ballot/


5 posted on 02/03/2012 5:01:36 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satan69

Wow, didn’t see that coming. /SUPER-BIG SARC


6 posted on 02/03/2012 5:02:03 PM PST by LaybackLenny (All hail Her Royal Highness Sarah, Queen of The Hobbits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satan69
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
7 posted on 02/03/2012 5:03:24 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satan69

And that would now make two courts that have ruled that Obama was born in the US and is a natural born citizen.


8 posted on 02/03/2012 5:12:03 PM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Having successfully foisted the lie on the people, there is no length they will not go to maintain it.


9 posted on 02/03/2012 5:13:11 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: satan69

“When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked bears rule, the people mourn.” Proverbs 29:2

Sadly, we live in an ungodly lawless age. May Almighty God have mercy on His righteous living in this wicked land.


10 posted on 02/03/2012 5:14:32 PM PST by datakcy (Declaring our love for God, country, and family ISN'T hate speech - it's common sense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satan69

should have taken the default judgement


11 posted on 02/03/2012 5:15:30 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
And that would now make two courts that have ruled that Obama was born in the US and is a natural born citizen.

Does this make you happy?

12 posted on 02/03/2012 5:16:23 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

shocked,,,,,im jusy shocked,,,,{s}


13 posted on 02/03/2012 5:18:40 PM PST by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

I am absolutely flabbergasted at this result.

It has been said, over and over, that 0bama thinks himself to be above the law, not to be bothered with mere legal questions and challenges. With this decision, it certainly appears he may be correct.

This judge should be removed from the bench.


14 posted on 02/03/2012 5:22:02 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

In other news, CONFIRMED! The Rule of Law is Dead.


15 posted on 02/03/2012 5:27:19 PM PST by Mechanicos (Why does the DOE have a SWAT Team?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: satan69

another judge ‘on the take’.......how much more could he have possibly wanted??? DAMN!!!


16 posted on 02/03/2012 5:29:31 PM PST by tuffy1 (tuffy1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datakcy

Maybe we will wake up and figure out, that our country is under a judgement, but I doubt it will happen until the pain gets much greater.


17 posted on 02/03/2012 5:31:06 PM PST by itsahoot (I will Vote for Palin, even if I have to write her in.(Previous tag line reactivated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: satan69

Stop gasping for breath, people. Think it through - no matter who won at this level, it would be appealed.

Knowing that, the judge simply did not want to be the one who went against a sitting president, since he wouldn’t be the final rule anyway. So, he played it safe.

The significant thing that happened here was that by allowing the case to be heard, he gave it standing and let it into the system.

This will be decided by the USSC, or not at all.


18 posted on 02/03/2012 5:35:17 PM PST by Talisker (Apology accepted, Captain Needa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satan69

Obama “became a citizen at birth and is a natural-born citizen,” Malihi wrote. Accordingly, Obama is eligible as a candidate for the upcoming presidential primary in March, the judge said


19 posted on 02/03/2012 5:37:59 PM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz; LucyT; Las Vegas Ron; Brown Deer
Photobucket
20 posted on 02/03/2012 5:42:05 PM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

The whole thing was a farce, probably set up by Obama.


21 posted on 02/03/2012 5:42:58 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Arguably three state courts have...New York did so in 1844:

“And the constitution itself contains a direct recognition of the subsisting common law principle, in the section which defines the qualification of the President. “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,” &c. The only standard which then existed, of a natural born citizen, was the rule of the common law, and no different standard has been adopted since. Suppose a person should be elected President who was native born, but of alien parents, could there be any reasonable doubt that he was eligible under the constitution? I think not...

...6. Upon principle, therefore, I can entertain no doubt, but that by the law of the United States, every person born within the dominions and allegiance of the United States, whatever were the situation of his parents, is a natural born citizen.”

http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/Lynch_v_Clarke_1844_ocr.pdf


22 posted on 02/03/2012 5:46:33 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: satan69

How much did obamas handlers pay the judge, or did they just threaten him? Inquiring minds want to know.


24 posted on 02/03/2012 5:51:10 PM PST by mardi59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Obama “became a citizen at birth and is a natural-born citizen,”
Just with what you cited, if the judge made the assumption that being a citizen by birth makes one a natural born citizen then he doesn’t know the difference between a citizen by birth and a natural born citizen.
And did he make this decision after ex parte contact(s) from the president’s counsel, who defaulted earlier by failing to appear at any hearings with his client? That would certainly be a clear ethical violation(s).


25 posted on 02/03/2012 5:55:42 PM PST by tumblindice ("ghetto masses" Cloward-Piven's own words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw


26 posted on 02/03/2012 5:56:09 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

And what documentation proved Obama was even born in the US? A fraudulent copy of a birth certificate? Still waiting on the good Sheriff Arpaio to get the microfilmed Hawaii birth certificates but not holding my breath...


27 posted on 02/03/2012 6:01:11 PM PST by Froggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: satan69

The Judge knows that he is not a natural born citizen.

BUT, the judge was told that “Federal” election law states that he must accept another states documents as statement of fact.

And they probably told him that would kill him if he found otherwise. (Remember, they burned Palin’s Church)


28 posted on 02/03/2012 6:03:03 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaybackLenny

Here we have an administrative judge who upon reflection, and considering his position, has decided that he does not want to rule that a sitting President of the United States is Constitutionally disqualified from the position.

Instead of crafting a decision that takes no notice of the political landscape but which follows the law without flinching, Judge Malihi instead chose to not make waves, and made a political decision. He then crafted a finding that supports his (political) decision.

I am shocked, I tell you; shocked!


29 posted on 02/03/2012 6:10:30 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LaybackLenny

Here we have an administrative judge who upon reflection, and considering his position, has decided that he does not want to rule that a sitting President of the United States is Constitutionally disqualified from the position.

Instead of crafting a decision that takes no notice of the political landscape but which follows the law without flinching, Judge Malihi instead chose to not make waves, and made a political decision. He then crafted a finding that supports his (political) decision.

I am shocked, I tell you; shocked!


30 posted on 02/03/2012 6:11:34 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: satan69

I am sorry I read this thread. I am sick to my stomach.


31 posted on 02/03/2012 6:14:18 PM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froggie

Remember about 14 years ago, about `98, we thought we’d never get to the, uh, bottom of whether Willie was lying about what really happened in the Oval office (although we all KNEW the truth) and then Monica served up the blue dress.

This time—again we all know the truth—but I don’t think anyone is going to cough up the evidence. (I think it’s called `disproving a negative’.) In any event no one wants to believe that the president of the USA is an even bigger liar than Bill Clinton.

At the same time Clinton was an adolescent enfant terrible, while Obama is a hardened socialist with Marxist friends determined to destroy the America we know and love. IMHO.


32 posted on 02/03/2012 6:16:41 PM PST by tumblindice ("ghetto masses" Cloward-Piven's own words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: satan69

Why isn’t this in breaking news?
Shouldn’t ALL Freepers know about this?


33 posted on 02/03/2012 6:24:23 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Breto

Kinda like that Nationwide Jingle:

“The Prince of Lies is on your side.”

The USA: a nice idea while it lasted.


34 posted on 02/03/2012 6:37:39 PM PST by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

obama people simply notified the judge he would find himself fully,completely, and continually under federal investigation and tax auditing IF he survived,that is ....

Who wants to share the fate of Demosthenes?


35 posted on 02/03/2012 6:42:55 PM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: goldi

Wow. I’m numb. Even Sheriff joe ain’t can’t fix this.


36 posted on 02/03/2012 6:50:42 PM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldi

Wow. I’m numb. Even Sheriff joe ain’t can’t fix this.


37 posted on 02/03/2012 6:51:28 PM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

You are absolutely correct and the SOB has been banned. This isn’t the first time he has shown his 0bamunist leanings. Of course he could sign up under another ID.


38 posted on 02/03/2012 6:55:44 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

OMG!! The kitties shredded him!!!


39 posted on 02/03/2012 7:01:22 PM PST by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: satan69

The Judge is a lying a$$ hole. He told all four Plaintiff’s lawyers he would issue an adverse ruling against the defendant in an in chambers pre-hearing confernce. Promulgation of this ruling is a lie and makes the entire proceeding a farces.


40 posted on 02/03/2012 7:02:16 PM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

“natural born citizen” has nothing to do with the location of one’s birth. You’re real close, at least you didn’t bring up the Lamaze birth.


41 posted on 02/03/2012 7:32:03 PM PST by Jabba the Nutt (.Are they stupid, malicious or evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the Current Quarter Expenses.


Donate to Free Republic!

42 posted on 02/03/2012 8:11:21 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: azishot; LucyT; onyx; TheOldLady; Las Vegas Ron
About time he was banned! He should have been banned when he said this back in 2010. Eaker had called him out then and Eaker and others were spot on:
”I’m not quite sure America has paid for the “mistake” of slavery,” posted by trumandogz… whatcha want Trumandogz? Reparations?

43 posted on 02/03/2012 8:41:31 PM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

He’s been a thorn in our butts for a long time. There are still quite a few out there but that’s for another day.


44 posted on 02/03/2012 8:56:32 PM PST by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: satan69
I am a realist. Obviously, our entire political system, the courts, the conservative and Marxist media, law enforcement, and our highest military are utterly corrupt. An oath means nothing to them. Millions of our citizens are willing to vote for a Marxist with a completely unknown history.

So...The thing to do is prepare for when the SHTF, because it is inevitably coming. The only glue that has held our nation's experiment in self-rule together is the basic morality, honesty, and good will of the citizenry. That glue is no longer there.

45 posted on 02/03/2012 9:05:20 PM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

Of course it makes him happy, but probably not as happy as his ZOT makes me. :P


46 posted on 02/03/2012 9:30:03 PM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Ok let’s say for the sake of arguement the birth certificate is “real” check. And the several experts say it was fake are wrong..check. And the girl who ran the SS# and found it was issued to someone in 1890 was inept...check. All facts were inconclusive to make a judgement or whatever...check. HOW does the judge explain that in Obamas on book “Dreams of my Father” said his dad was Kenyan when that means he could be a natural born citizen if both parents are not US citizens. I looked it up and they pitched a fit about McCain and had him turn over his info cause he was born in Panama however his dad was in service stationed there and both parents were US citizens. One more question..does this now mean that if I am subpeoned to court I can blow them off and not show up??? Obama is not who he says he is or he would not have spent millions to cover it up, if he couldn’t be in court (not) he would have gotten documents and sent his attorney. He didn’t show up didn’t send attorney and was In contempt of court but judge says he won’t file contempt of court. Obama needs GA votes to win again.. looks llike he has shown once again “I AM ABOVE THE LAW”


47 posted on 02/03/2012 9:30:28 PM PST by sharc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Which is rather curious since no legal proof has been presented to the courts to prove that Obama was born in the U.S.


48 posted on 02/03/2012 11:09:23 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

The assistant vice-chancellor in New York ignored Supreme Court precedent from Inglis v. Sailor’s Snug Harbour that disproved his belief. There’s a reason why this case is NOT quoted as precedence.


49 posted on 02/03/2012 11:11:33 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

actually, the ruling was that the judge didn’t see the evidence as being compelling. of course, this doesn’t mean that the defense, which never showed up, carried their burden of proof... proof that the candidate was eligible

unless the defendant WAS represented... by the judge

this ruling does not state how he is eligible to be on the ballot


50 posted on 02/03/2012 11:26:09 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson