Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Find from 425 million years ago with body, limbs, eyes, gills and alimentary system preserved
PhysOrg ^ | 12-11-2012

Posted on 12/12/2012 6:59:54 AM PST by Renfield

An international team of researchers have made an extremely rare discovery of a species of animal - related to crabs, lobsters and shrimps – that is new to science.

Scientists from the universities of Leicester, Oxford, Imperial and Yale have announced their discovery of a new and scientifically important fossil species of ostracod in the journal, Proceedings of The Royal Society B.

The discovered species, which is up to 10 millimetres long, is special because it is exceptionally well preserved, complete with not only the shell but also the soft parts – its body, limbs, eyes, gills and alimentary system. Such discoveries are extremely rare in the fossil record.

The discovery of the tiny shelled arthropod was made in 425 million year old rocks in Herefordshire, Welsh Borderland. The rocks at the site date to the Silurian period of geological time, when southern Britain was a sea area on a small continent situated in warm, southerly subtropical latitudes. The ostracods and associated marine animals living there were covered by a fall of volcanic ash that preserved them frozen in time....

(Excerpt) Read more at phys.org ...


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; paleontology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Renfield

Butter sauce or cocktail sauce....?

That is my only question!


21 posted on 12/12/2012 7:59:53 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Not necessarily. My preference is to use “shrimps” when I mean to enumerate a discrete quantity, and shrimp solely as a collective noun, but both “shrimps” and “shrimp” are acceptable plurals.

In this case, I think the author uses “shrimps,” because he is speaking of multiple populations of shrimp, just as one might use “sands.”


22 posted on 12/12/2012 8:02:07 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

No problem, FRiend.

Sometimes my jokes are pretty lame. (LOL!)


23 posted on 12/12/2012 8:02:07 AM PST by left that other site (Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Down here in the south, it’s pronounced, swumps.


24 posted on 12/12/2012 8:05:38 AM PST by mothball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

it looks like it ate several baby dinosaurs and a few cockroaches.


25 posted on 12/12/2012 8:09:10 AM PST by RitchieAprile (the obstreperous gentleman..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Nevertheless, these shrimps are lost in the sands of times./s

:-)


26 posted on 12/12/2012 8:09:57 AM PST by left that other site (Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mothball

LOL!


27 posted on 12/12/2012 8:20:20 AM PST by left that other site (Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

One don’t count...Let’s see 2 or more of ‘em...


28 posted on 12/12/2012 8:29:21 AM PST by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

ANYTIME ANYONE starts a story with “Millions and Millions of year ago” ya know a young earther will show up and hijack the thread.


29 posted on 12/12/2012 8:51:01 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Or maybe the paper mache art project from Kindergarden???


30 posted on 12/12/2012 10:36:10 AM PST by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

That would be an excellent work of art from a Kindergarten student. I only wrapped paper mache around an empty salad dressing container.


31 posted on 12/12/2012 10:47:26 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Yes, the plural of shrimp is shrimp. As is deer, deer.


32 posted on 12/12/2012 11:36:57 AM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

Thank you for agreeing!

Ever since I announced my little bit of grammatical heresy, I have been eating a steady diet of worms.

Not NEARLY as tasty as SHRIMP, although the right sauce can make ever worms taste good.


33 posted on 12/12/2012 5:26:19 PM PST by left that other site (Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

 GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks Renfield.

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.


34 posted on 12/15/2012 11:28:15 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson