Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2012 US Electoral Map With Congressional District System
February 14, 2013

Posted on 02/14/2013 8:29:13 PM PST by JerseyanExile

The concept of the nation moving to a Nebraska-Maine electoral system has been brought up here several times. This spurred the question of "well, would it hurt or help us if applied on a national level?" Well, I recently stumbled across a map on another forum, and we have an answer. Somebody did the research, and made a map based on the results. States are colored by whoever won the two statewide electors.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

The results? Democrats, 270 Electoral Votes, Republicans, 268. Now, obviously, if such a method had been used in real life, the campaigns would have changed strategies, gone after individual districts in "enemy territory". Some districts that went Democrat or Republican historically would go the other way. But still, this is useful to get a general idea of where things would stand with the Congressional District method.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2012election; elections; electoralsystem

1 posted on 02/14/2013 8:29:22 PM PST by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

The best argument for adopting the district system is that voter fraud is confined to the district where it occurs plus possibly the two at large state electors, not entire states with large blocks of electoral votes.


2 posted on 02/14/2013 8:38:41 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

Bump


3 posted on 02/14/2013 8:43:49 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman; JerseyanExile

SO true, and what an interesting map...especially for me in Ohio!


4 posted on 02/14/2013 8:44:29 PM PST by 88keys (where are the real Americans?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

Can’t we just organize a migration of Conceratives to these districts?

California is a beautiful place to live.... especially with more conseratives!


5 posted on 02/14/2013 8:54:52 PM PST by WomBom ("I read Free Republic for the pictures")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

I would like it. It would represent the total vote more accurate.


6 posted on 02/14/2013 8:59:31 PM PST by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

Central MA would also be red,


7 posted on 02/14/2013 9:29:20 PM PST by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WomBom

Kalipornia is a lost cause


8 posted on 02/14/2013 9:33:01 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

This map gives no red to MA or any of those surrounding small states, not even NH


9 posted on 02/14/2013 9:34:37 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

“Kalipornia is a lost cause”

With this system, Every state can send electors towards an eventual winner, and forces them to spread out spending.

As it is now, the candidates need no spending in California or Texas, because the electoral outcome is already decided.

I’ll venture that in numbers California has just as many, if not more conservative voters than Texas.


10 posted on 02/14/2013 9:59:19 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

Kalipornia itself is a lost cause, no matter how their electors are split up


11 posted on 02/14/2013 10:02:57 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

bttt


12 posted on 02/14/2013 10:07:28 PM PST by Baynative (I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. I can't put it down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

That’s because this map is based off of the historic 2012 results by congressional district and no New England CDs went for Romney.


13 posted on 02/14/2013 10:17:53 PM PST by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

Remember how the establishment pimping Willard (and McCain before him) said that he’d help the GOP win New England ! Not a single CD went for him. What a joke.


14 posted on 02/15/2013 1:21:59 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 88keys
Ohio is interesting and has a roughly 6 electoral vote GOP advantage in what is essentially a 50-50 state. The only other big swing states which approach that much GOP skewing are Pennsylvania (4) and Florida (3).

OTOH, big Democrat strongholds such as California (10), New York (7) and Illinois (2) are skewed toward the Democrats by a counterbalancing amount.

The progressive left is always whining about us being more like Europe. Most of Europe essentially choose their national leaders based on the results of what would be equivalent to our congressional districts.

15 posted on 02/15/2013 7:57:52 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson