Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Task force calls for routine HIV testing for all adults
Reuters ^ | Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:42pm EDT | Julie Steenhuysen

Posted on 04/29/2013 11:29:27 PM PDT by Olog-hai

An influential U.S. panel is calling for HIV screening for all Americans aged 15 to 65, regardless of whether they are considered to be at high risk, a change that may help lift some of the stigma associated with HIV testing.

The new guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), a government-backed panel of doctors and scientists, now align with longstanding recommendations by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for testing of all adults aged 15 to 65, regardless of their risk. …

Despite strides in reducing cases of HIV infection in the United States in the past three decades, as many as 50,000 Americans become infected with the virus each year. The CDC estimates that almost 1.2 million people in the United States are infected with HIV, yet 20 percent to 25 percent of them do not know it. …

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: aidstesting; hivtesting; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: browniexyz

“Abbott Laboratories’

Worked in a lab for many years and Abbott was the only company I remember that had their test kits pulled because they were giving questionable results. Their products were off of the market for quite some time.


41 posted on 04/30/2013 4:31:36 AM PDT by heylady (“Sometimes I wish I could be a Democrat and then I remember I have a soul.”( Deb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

This has to be satire...


42 posted on 04/30/2013 4:49:02 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

D-Day for Abbott

In Vivo, December 1999, Vol. 17, No. 11, p. 3-7
“January 10 is D-Day for Abbott Laboratories Inc. to pull 125 diagnostic tests off the market as part of its consent decree with the FDA (See “Abbott Gets into Hot Water, “ IN VIVO November 1999). The decree, which follows the FDA’s accusation that Abbott used shoddy manufacturing processes in its main US-based manufacturing plants, is unprecedented— and hurts far more than Abbott alone. “


43 posted on 04/30/2013 4:54:00 AM PDT by heylady (“Sometimes I wish I could be a Democrat and then I remember I have a soul.”( Deb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Just another excuse for Big Brother to stick his nose
in business that they have no justification for being
involved with. While they are at it why not collect
DNA samples, search your house for anything “dangerous”
and hand you a diet that was approved by the White House
Wookie.


44 posted on 04/30/2013 5:19:35 AM PDT by nvscanman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Ever heard about false positives?
If I get a false positive, how many negative tests will it take until they finally accept I'm not infected and I can get insurance again?

45 posted on 04/30/2013 5:56:33 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Same here. Blood donor and military. We get tested every two years if we don’t donate.


46 posted on 04/30/2013 5:57:47 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (I have a copy of the Constitution! And I'm not afraid to use it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic; Olog-hai
Who supplies the tests and how much do they cost? Who on the panel has stock in the companies? Sounds like a crony payoff to me.

Tests are absolutely free now, to those on medicare. No deductibles, no co pays, unlike anything else that medicare covers.

47 posted on 04/30/2013 6:13:09 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028
Yes, of course people that have sex with many strange partners

Hey, now. For some of us, the strange ones are the only ones we had a shot with.

48 posted on 04/30/2013 6:35:54 AM PDT by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Part of the plan to make “AIDS everyone’s problem.”


49 posted on 04/30/2013 6:37:24 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
If you ask me, this is a privacy issue. I have virtually ZERO chance of contracting AIDS, but I reserve the right to keep that fact to myself. Not even my doctor needs to know, unless I want to tell him.

Don't tell me this information won't be released to a federal database.

50 posted on 04/30/2013 6:44:39 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
regardless of whether they are considered to be at high risk, a change that may help lift some of the stigma associated with HIV testing.

So because some people engage in risky behavior and contract HIV, we have to test everyone so THEY won't be 'stigmatized' because of THEIR actions?

ROFLMAO!

Good luck with that.

51 posted on 04/30/2013 6:46:54 AM PDT by MamaTexan (Please do not mistake my devotion to fairness as permission to be used as a doormat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone
If these "people" don't know they're infected, how does the government know?

My guess is that this is the discovered cases of infection in which the carrier claims he didn't know. In other words, this is the LOW end of the infection rate among homosexuals. Probably above 50%.

52 posted on 04/30/2013 6:48:04 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It will have to be by force because I’m not willingly giving a sample.


53 posted on 04/30/2013 9:13:31 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

“Who supplies the tests and how much do they cost? Who on the panel has stock in the companies? Sounds like a crony payoff to me.”

+1


54 posted on 04/30/2013 9:14:35 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
When the ad campaigns ran in the 80s saying 'anyoone can get it' (or words to that effect) my 70+ widowed for a decade grandmother asked my aunt if she should be tested. Funny but sad.
55 posted on 04/30/2013 9:16:31 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (I'll stick to facts and logic, and not follow into the gutter those who make disagreements personal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

I’m glad those folks didn’t try the same thing with lobotomies.


56 posted on 04/30/2013 11:01:55 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

I agree. This isn’t an airbourne disease, you have to engage in particular behavior to get it.
I had to make a trip to an emergency room many years agp. I didn’t have health insurance. I told them I had run out of some medication, who my Dr. was, etc. They asked me if I had done drugs and I said no. I get the bill and they charged me for a drug test. I disputed it and they told me that people lie. I told them that if they wanted to treat me like a criminal I sure wasn’t going to pay for the test. Took me some hell raising but I won.


57 posted on 04/30/2013 11:07:35 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

They’ll just perform the test with other blood tests. You’ll have to vehemently forbid this, but you’ll never know if they do.

I’m still relatively young and healthy, so this encroachment seriously discourages me from getting checkups.


58 posted on 04/30/2013 11:23:49 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A better approach would be for everyone to stop having sex with strangers in bathrooms and at interstate rest stops.


59 posted on 04/30/2013 3:45:11 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

In related news:

Newly Founded Organization Takes on FDA Gay Blood Ban

http://www.advocate.com/health/2013/04/23/newly-founded-organization-takes-fda-gay-blood-ban


60 posted on 04/30/2013 6:44:47 PM PDT by massmike (At least no one is wearing a "Ron Paul - 2016" tee shirt........yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson