Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$27,500 smartgun can hit a target over 1,000 yards away
dailycaller.com ^ | 6-12-2013 | Kate Grise

Posted on 06/12/2013 4:43:47 AM PDT by servo1969

Now everyone can shoot like a trained marksman. For a price.

A Texas-based applied technology firm has launched new smartgun technology that gives novice shooters the chance to participate in “extreme distance hunting.”

TrackingPoint’s new precision guided firearm technology, XactSystem, allows the shooter to lock onto a target before allowing the gun to fire upon the intended target, much like a fighter jet’s “lock-and-launch” technology.

And the firearm can consistently hit a target from over 1,000 yards away, the maker says.

“Think of it like a smart rifle. You have a smart car; you got a smartphone; well, now we have a smart rifle,” CEO Jason Schauble told CNNMoney.

The rifles fitted with the XactSystem technology can accurately shoot from over 1,000 yards, and TrackingPoint claims the company record is shooting a South African wildebeest at 1,103 yards.

The system and bolt-action rifles run from $22,500 to $27,500.

The rifles are WiFi equipped to allow the shooter to record their shot and immediately send it to a tablet or smartphone to view and upload to social media sites.

Schauble told CNN Money this is the first technology of its kind, even within the military, and that his company is planning on selling 500 TrackingPoint rifles this year, mainly to clients who want to hunt big game from long ranges.

With the technology, the shooter “tags” a target using a red button on the trigger guard. After the tag is set, the shooter aims the gun and holds down the trigger. Once the tag and the crosshairs of the scope line up, the gun fires.

“There are a number of people who say the gun shoots itself,” Schauble said. “It doesn’t. The shooter is always in the loop.”

The network tracking scope’s technology takes environmental factors, such as temperature, wind speeds, and gravity, into account to ensure a clean shot.

Some in the security sector, however, have reservations about the long-range rifle.

“There are a handful of snipers who can hit a target at 1,000 yards. But now, anybody can do it,” Rommel Dionisio, a gun industry analyst for Wedbush Securities told CNN Money. “You can put some tremendous capability in the hands of just about anybody, even an untrained shooter.”


TOPICS: Hobbies; Military/Veterans; Science; Sports
KEYWORDS: armedcitizen; banglist; guncontrol; secondamendment; smartgun; texas; trackingpoint
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu2EqO1qbrQ
1 posted on 06/12/2013 4:43:48 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Note that it doesn’t “guide” the projectile. If the target moves, the shot is wasted.


2 posted on 06/12/2013 4:46:38 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

This video bothers me. I see a lot of gut shots. That’s really crappy shot placement. Simply hitting a standing animal anywhere on its body isn’t that wonderful. You’re supposed to try and take it down fast. Aren’t you? Did I miss some aspect of hunting along the way?


3 posted on 06/12/2013 4:53:17 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

> Note that it doesn’t “guide” the projectile. If the target moves, the shot is wasted.

Not yet anyway. As soon as 0’s DARPA figures out how to manufacture mini missiles with guidance systems that can be fired from a gun we’re screwed. I’m sure they’ve already thought of it.


4 posted on 06/12/2013 4:53:21 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Bookmark


5 posted on 06/12/2013 4:53:55 AM PDT by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
I hunt. I wait for days for a buck to come into view, then I rely on my shooting skills, my lever action Marlin or my sporterized ‘03(bought it that way...I would never ruin a classic like the ‘03 springfield). Or any number of weapons I possess.
I would call what is in the video, killing or shooting and not hunting....but hey, that's just me.

I do hope that our boys in the sandbox have this technology. as war is not a sport, having more precision snipers out there, that are on our side can only be a bonus.

6 posted on 06/12/2013 4:58:51 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Fire and Forget?


7 posted on 06/12/2013 5:03:05 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Oh boy, Swinestein and Schmucky aren’t going to like this. At all.


8 posted on 06/12/2013 5:03:38 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Great gun. Actually great system, since it is more of a system than a gun, with the gun part being the most basic aspect of a much larger union of equipment.

I do wonder however if there is a difference between hunting game and shooting game. I don't see the skill involved here ...no tracking, no stalking, no baited breath before taking a shot. All that is required here is US$30,000 and the ability to hold a trigger while a computer does everything else for you.

Yes, I also don't think canned hunts are hunts.

Anyways, as for the gun that is one absolute master-piece of a weapon. Although I am certain it will be quickly banned in the US. If Libs were getting fits over the Barrett .50 cal imagine the epileptic fits over this system. :)

9 posted on 06/12/2013 5:05:32 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I hope that “hunter” doesn’t brag about his long range shots. Elements of marksmanship like breathing, trigger pull and pulse awareness are removed from the equation.


10 posted on 06/12/2013 5:08:51 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

http://avp.wikia.com/wiki/M56_Smartgun

“LET’S ROCK!!”


11 posted on 06/12/2013 5:09:40 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (IRS = Internal Revenge Service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
Exactly. Totally agree. There is hunting, and then there is shooting. One is sportsmanly and requires/hones skill, while the other is equivalent to playing a video game. One has the game having a fighting chance (for example, if you are not careful about wind direction, or you walk like a pregnant hippo, the animal will flee), while the other is like killing an ant with a magnifying glass. Hunting requires skills, while shooting only requires a weapon. In South Africa they will let you shoot a caged lion for a price, and you can then brag how you tracked down the beast.

Anyways, this is perfect for the military, as well as patriots and assassins alike. But it is definitely not a hunting system, even though it shoots very well.

12 posted on 06/12/2013 5:10:51 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

.50 BMG for a Kudu. Seems a bit much.


13 posted on 06/12/2013 5:13:51 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo ( Walker 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
My husband and I hunted with a guide in Canada who had a huge gun he named Milamore. He named it that because he could hit his target from a mile or more away. Saw him do it.
14 posted on 06/12/2013 5:17:02 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
.50 BMG for a Kudu. Seems a bit much.

But under powered for a Limo.

15 posted on 06/12/2013 5:18:16 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

45-55 years ago I read an article in an outdoor sporting magazine. The guy had a shotgun that would not fire if it wasn’t on target. Other guys went hunting with him, and he let them borrow his shotgun. Some commented about the trigger pull was so easy and smoothe, while others complained about how hard the trigger pull was. I would never say not to put this new gun on the market, but I would never hunt with one, nor would I hunt with someone who was using one.


16 posted on 06/12/2013 5:20:10 AM PDT by Rannug ("God has given it to me, let him who touches it beware.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

We can already give today’s award for Journalistic Malpractice for the headline and the first sentence. The company has already said that they won’t sell it to “civilians”.


17 posted on 06/12/2013 5:21:50 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
If the target moves, the shot is wasted.

At 1,000 yards and a .338 Lapua Magnum, or the .300 Win Mag, he has less than a second to move. And the sound of the shot won't get there until 2 seconds later.

18 posted on 06/12/2013 5:23:31 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

If hunting were truly fair as your idea goes, the game would be packing too. :)


19 posted on 06/12/2013 5:24:14 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
It isn't that hard to put a 1000 meter gun together for just under $1000 today.The Chinese are selling good scopes for 200 - 400, there's that Savage heavy barreled rifle in 270 WSM caliber and the Barnes 140gr all copper bullets with a huge ballistic coefficient.

270 WSM ammo can easily be loaded to shoot at 3400 fps or thereabouts and it isn't that hard to get mil-dot values out to 1000 meters for something like that. You can get ballpark mil-dot distances simply by doing retrocalculations with a decent ballistics program.

20 posted on 06/12/2013 5:27:08 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson