Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why a Third Party Help Republicans
Vanity | July 2, 2013 | EqAndyBuzz

Posted on 07/02/2013 8:17:08 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz

If Conservatives break away from the Republican party, the big winner are Republicans.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: conservative; democrat; liberal; randsconcerntrolls; republican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Ray76

Hey, you saw Rubio fold like a cheap sombrero? It’s not hard shootin anymore.

Every RINO - to their demise [even RYAN!!] - has shown their cards and they will pay.

Baptism by fire.


21 posted on 07/02/2013 9:01:37 PM PDT by txhurl (RNC 'voter suppression': attempting to limit each voter to ONE vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
DUMP BOEHNER

Save America


22 posted on 07/02/2013 9:02:43 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

NO


23 posted on 07/02/2013 9:03:20 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
I'm the national chairman of a nascent "third" party, America's Party, but some may be surprised to hear that I am really fundamentally anti-party. As I like to say, I'm not a Republican. I'm not a Democrat. I'm an American. We're partisans only for America's founding principles.

Our Constitution doesn't mention parties, so in other words, this party-dominated system is fundamentally extra-constitutional.

Our first reference point on this subject for years has been the strong warnings issued to posterity by our first, and best, President, in his Farewell Address:

"I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.

Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the government and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in governments of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume."

-- President George Washington, 1796

"There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."

-- President John Adams


24 posted on 07/02/2013 9:06:13 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stickywillie
perot wasn’t a solid Conservative

Nope...But he was solidly pro America...I believe we as a Nation would be far better off without Nafta, the WTO and the NWO...

25 posted on 07/02/2013 9:12:13 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Not this time—this will be a movement beyond any one persons ego. It will bring sweeping change to the body politic. In the end the GOP will need to change of go the way of the Whigs.


26 posted on 07/02/2013 9:21:27 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

A conservative third party would destroy the GOP within 2 election cycles. Without having to cater to conservatives, the GOP would lurch further left, until they reached a position midway between a true Conservative party and the Democrats. AT THAT POINT, the party will be shorn apart from both ends of the political spectrum.

The American Public would spew the lukewarm GOP out. You can’t straddle the fence and lead the charge at the same time.

The GOP would be dead within two elections cycles if Conservatives were willing to leave en masse.

The only thing left is a face of the new Conservative Party strong enough to bring along enough supporters to get the ball rolling. Palin and Levin followed shortly thereafter by the likes of Cruz and Gohmert would be enough.

The GOP will not survive the coming desertion of its base. Couldn’t happen to a more deserving group of plotters.


27 posted on 07/02/2013 9:32:16 PM PDT by ziravan (Choose sides. You too, NSA snoop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

republicans pushing the same policies as democrats

0bamacare pushed thru.. no effort to repeal

republicans have controlled the house.. the spending... for two years... no cut in spending rate

now we’re going to get amnesty

if you vote republican, you might as well vote dem


28 posted on 07/02/2013 9:34:02 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."

— President John Adams
That illustrates why Adams is my one of my two favorite Presidents (Coolidge is the other).
29 posted on 07/02/2013 9:43:23 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Fail.

And if the Republicans need us, they know where we are.

When, why, and how would that ever happen?

30 posted on 07/02/2013 9:51:18 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
Okay...since we're dropping names, I'll drop some for you:

Bush the First (gave us Klinton)
Dole
Bush the Second (gave us the Obammunist)
Insane McCain
Mittens

Yeah buddy...the GOP establishment has a great track record the last few decades, don't they?

But go ahead, nominate Christie the Hutt or Jeb Bush, and see what that gets us...another Klinton in the WH.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

31 posted on 07/02/2013 10:06:54 PM PDT by wku man (Amnesty? No Way, Jose (No Se Puede!) by 10 Pound Test http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsTUQ8yOI2c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
The GOPe and the Libertarians can have the Republican party. Americans no matter what they have called themselves in the past are clamoring for a Conservative party that espouses Reagan's three legged stool approach fiscal. religious,defense conservatives.

Create that and the people will follow..

32 posted on 07/02/2013 10:07:00 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
....."Look at the Republican primaries. What is happening? Well, the media, along with the Democrat and Republican strategists via whatever works gets rid of the most Conservative candidates.

Thanks to Mitt Romney and his millions did that in 2012; Juan McCain, with the help of Rove, did that in 2008!

Many conservatives who watched that happen, stayed home on the first Tuesday in November, 2012, fewer did in '08 solely because of Sarah Palin!

33 posted on 07/02/2013 10:13:42 PM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

If conservatives break away from the Republican Party, the big losers are Republicans, but the big winners are conservatives.


34 posted on 07/02/2013 10:41:12 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

The Freedom Party will finally put the GOP to rest.


35 posted on 07/02/2013 10:41:44 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

I have no problem at all to primary RINO’s. I do have a serious problem with replacing the RINO’s with loser candidate with result a democRAT wins and it is 10 times worst.

As an example I supported Cruz during the primaries because I liked his speaking ability. My hunch said he could win in the general. Please no more candidates like Akin and Hoffman.


36 posted on 07/02/2013 10:46:39 PM PDT by entropy12 (Even tho Obama is now a lame duck, with 2014 House majority, he will be a dangerously socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ziravan

“The only thing left is a face of the new Conservative Party strong enough to bring along enough supporters to get the ball rolling. Palin and Levin followed shortly thereafter by the likes of Cruz and Gohmert would be enough.”

I can’t see Levin ever leaving the Republican party. Hope I’m wrong. But even though he rants and yells and calls the RINO republicans he doesn’t like silly childish names, he is again going to be telling us he would vote for that orange juice can before he would vote for Hillary and exhorting us all to vote for Jeb Bush in 2016. He said Monday he doesn’t think 3rd party is the answer.


37 posted on 07/02/2013 11:29:17 PM PDT by Reddon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I am convinced that media, the news papers of the day during our founding years post Constitution, invented party labels and it caught on with everyone wanting to be identified as a (blank) or a (blankity blank)...

I am not so sure that we can just eliminate the idea, because it's almost a natural thing to want to be part of a group. Humans are pack animals....most of them anyway.

Some of us are lone wolves...I qualify for that as do you, as do most humans who lead rather than follow..but everyone can't lead so we have parties..

38 posted on 07/02/2013 11:42:46 PM PDT by Cold Heat (Have you reached your breaking point yet? If not now....then when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

You could not be more wrong historically. The newspapers of the day were founded and funded by the political parties, not the other way around. The parties were a creation of the founding fathers themselves. If you are looking for the culprits, the three most responsible were Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton, two who authored the Federalist Papers.


39 posted on 07/03/2013 5:33:42 AM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse

This is absurd. A third party will take votes away from Republicans. Period. End of Paragraph. End of Story. End of Book. Don’t delude yourself.


40 posted on 07/03/2013 5:54:00 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson