Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CDC: Turns Out There's No Benefit to Reducing Salt At All
Ace of Spades HQ ^ | 7-11-2013 | Ace

Posted on 07/11/2013 12:41:32 PM PDT by servo1969

The only people I can think of who have a wider gap between Asserted Expertise and Actual Expertise than the media are nutritionists.

I don't think this applies to people specifically diagnosed with hypertension or other salt-sensitive conditions, but for most of us:

A recent report commissioned by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) reviewed the health benefits of reducing salt intake and the take-home message is that salt, in the quantities consumed by most Americans, is no longer considered a substantial health hazard. What the CDC study reported explicitly is that there is no benefit, and may be a danger, from reducing our salt intake below 1 tsp per day. What was absent about the report was is the difference between healthy mineral salts and iodized table salt.

It may be that we’re better off with more salt than less, up to 2 or even 3 tsp per day. How did it happen that such standard medical advice drifted astray, then went un-corrected for so long?

Because arrogant, controlling people, who really should just be kindergarten teachers, have a certain way they live their lives, or a way they think you should live your life, and they gloss over things like actual science in order to reach the conclusion that you should Do What They Want You To Do.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Health/Medicine; Science
KEYWORDS: cdc; low; salt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Pining_4_TX
Most scientific papers are probably wrong

If it weren't for bad science, we wouldn't have any science at all. :0\

21 posted on 07/11/2013 1:03:33 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who could have guessed that one day pro wrestling would be less fake than mainstream journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
It took 3 clicks to get to the full, original article this news bite is based on. Here it is.

June 21, 2013 by DAVE MIHALOVIC CDC Admits Long-Standing Error in Medical Science - There Is No Benefit In Reducing Salt Intake And It May Even Be Dangerous

And THAT article is based on this May 14th CDC scientific study. And that study appears to have been a compilation of results from other studies...

22 posted on 07/11/2013 1:03:35 PM PDT by JediJones (Gridlock means taking credit for stuff that automatically happens while you do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

The true believers will not believe this and keep preaching the old way.


23 posted on 07/11/2013 1:04:06 PM PDT by I want the USA back (If I Pi$$ed off just one liberal today my mission has been accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“If it weren’t for bad science, we wouldn’t have any science at all. :0\ “

I love it! I should send this to one of my sons, a hotshot scientist. ;-)


24 posted on 07/11/2013 1:07:38 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

I am old enough to now be living through my THIRD complete cycle of “eggs and coffee are gonna kill you”.....”No, they’re not”......”uhhh, yes they are”......”No, they’re not”


25 posted on 07/11/2013 1:07:38 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: servo1969; a fool in paradise

I remember when tomahtoes were gonna kill you, but that was when they were vegetables, before they became fruits.


26 posted on 07/11/2013 1:09:30 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

Yes, pretzels have been similarly ruined, and I now have to add salt to cans of nuts also.


27 posted on 07/11/2013 1:09:35 PM PDT by wrencher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
before they became fruits

ah... the homo agenda strikes again...

28 posted on 07/11/2013 1:10:55 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Wait, in a few years they will again begin to scare us about salt. Been there, done that. In the 80's, I remember the first gambit into salt hysteria. After some years of everybody reducing salt intake, somebody did an actual study, and guess what, oops, they were wrong.

So, everybody goes back to using salt, then a little later, oh, no, salt is evil again and everybody should ban salt (Mayor Bloomberg for instance). Now, again, oops, we were wrong.

Can we just stop listening to these people. The last time we went thru something like this (I think is was the avian flu thingy), I ended up deciding that the Govt. and the media want to keep us hysterical. Because, then, we are looking to the Govt. to DO SOMETHING!

29 posted on 07/11/2013 1:11:01 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
eggs and coffee are gonna kill you”.....”

Yeah, I'm right there with you, age and all. Eggs, IMHO, are a perfect food. And, I believe sometime last year a study came out that had found that a certain enzyme in eggs (colene, cholene -- something like that) actually helped to mitigate the cholestoral in the egg. So, yes eggs have cholesteral; but, they also have the enzyme to help you deal with it -- voila! perfect food.

30 posted on 07/11/2013 1:15:53 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

Clearly McDonalds, Frito Lay, Rold Gold and Morton Salt aren’t paying off the right people.


31 posted on 07/11/2013 1:17:10 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

This illustrates a problem with EVERY form of singular top expert authorities on ANYTHING - making them the top offical experts does not make them right.

What we need is to reject the paradigm that accepts the creation of and authority given to “top official experts” of any kind.

We need “expert information” and dissemination of it, but single source, a single top offical source does not provide ALL the best expert information, it presents an official orthodoxy, that’s all.


32 posted on 07/11/2013 1:19:36 PM PDT by Wuli (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Salt free diets administered to old people in nursing homes serves one purpose. The food is so tasteless that the quit eating and slowly starve. Mission accomplished.


33 posted on 07/11/2013 1:20:46 PM PDT by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I think we should take this study with a grain of salt...


34 posted on 07/11/2013 1:21:07 PM PDT by JediJones (Gridlock means taking credit for stuff that automatically happens while you do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

the old rules of avoiding gluttony and all things in moderation accepted, have been good nutrional advice for ages


35 posted on 07/11/2013 1:21:45 PM PDT by Wuli (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
No, now they’re telling us fish oil supplements promote prostate cancer.

Depends on where you put the supplement.

36 posted on 07/11/2013 1:22:09 PM PDT by CougarGA7 ("War is an outcome based activity" - Dr. Robert Citino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

CDC: We were wrong about salt and a bunch of other things too, but we’re not wrong about vaccines. Nope. Not at all. Especially that Gardisil vaccine. You need to inject your kids with Gardisil. By the way, if you feed those same kids raw milk we’ll have CPS take them away from you.


37 posted on 07/11/2013 1:26:34 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
And I heard that additional fish oil cause prostrate cancer in men. "

Yup. I take about 2400 mgs per day (doc's orders). I read the report saying dietary supplements of fish oil tabs may cause 70% increased risk of prostate cancer. Buried deep, very deep within the report is one sentence stating the researchers were not sure if the test subjects had been eating fish, or consuming fish oil tabs, or both. More research funding needed. Send cash, cheques, or money orders to find out.
38 posted on 07/11/2013 1:28:47 PM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
As my father got older, I became the primary caregiver....as with most oldsters, his diet called for "low sodium" everything.

He eventually started to get episodes of very low blood pressure, so I asked his cardiologist about adding salt back into his diet; his answer, "Sure - of course".

Ditto with that coumadin racket, that keeps the blood labs in business. His got so out of whack that I asked the cardio about alternatives; his answer, "Quit the blood thinner and give him an 81 aspirin daily".

39 posted on 07/11/2013 1:31:17 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (Piffle....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Mom's doing the Coumadin thing now. And dad has got so many problems there's no sense in lifestyle changes for health reasons at this point.

But none of them are salt related - although he's been putting an inch and a half on everything for decades.

40 posted on 07/11/2013 1:37:31 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson