Posted on 05/13/2015 10:01:38 PM PDT by nickcarraway
The California almond is getting a bad reputation.
At least that’s what the numbers show. According to an April report released by the Pacific Institute, a non-profit research firm based in Oakland, almonds are not the most water intensive crop grown in the Golden State.
In fact, almonds tie with pistachios for fourth place in the ranking of California’s water intensive crops and require on average four acre-feet of water per acre. One acre-foot is approximately 326,000 gallons of water. Alfalfa and rice are the top two water users, averaging five acre-feet of water per acre a piece, though alfalfa can sometimes take up to six acre-feet.
The report was released amidst an historic state drought and widespread concern over how the state will utilize a limited water supply. Critics have started searching for a scapegoat, and the California almond is bearing the brunt of the blame.
That’s not to say that almonds aren’t water hungry. Since the story first broke last year, several in-depth reports have highlighted just how much water the California almond is consuming and the myriad ways in which farmers have had to adapt to meet the crop’s demands despite a dwindling water source.
California is the main supplier of fruits, nuts and vegetables nationwide, so it’s no surprise that 80 percent of the developed water supply here is consumed by agriculture. Almonds use only 8 percent of that agricultural water, according to the Almond Board of California.
“These trees produce very valuable crops, both economically and also nutritionally,” said Dennis Baldocchi, a biometerologist at the University of California, Berkeley who grew up on an almond farm. “This is why almonds shouldn’t be demonized as they are. I guess the biggest question we need to ask our society is how many acres and how many tons of almonds do we need given the precious water that we have statewide?” he added.
While almonds spend in water, they return in revenue, according to the most recent data from the United States Department of Agriculture.
California is now the world’s leading producer of almonds, and the nut is the second highest grossing agricultural commodity in the state. Almonds brought in nearly $6 billion in 2013, the USDA’s reports show. The total revenue for state agriculture that same year was $38.7 billion.
Almonds are making more money because the state is now growing more of them. The acreage of land used to farm almonds nearly doubled in the past decade. Other, more water intensive crops like alfalfa still use more real estate than almonds.
And those crops aren’t as lucrative as almonds, according to the Pacific Institute report. Data compiled for that report show that almonds earn around $1100 per acre-foot of water used, while alfalfa earns only $175. Alfalfa is used, though, to feed California’s cows, which play a major role in the dairy industry—the state’s highest grossing agricultural commodity. Milk and cream grossed nearly $8 billion in 2013.
Berkeley’s Dennis Baldocchi said he’d like to change in the script on almonds, turning what has become a scapegoat crop into a larger lesson for the state’s future in agriculture.
“Solutions to this problem are more complex than simple bromides,” he told NBC Bay Area. “Almonds are bad. Almonds are good. We have to really think more carefully about what crops we want to grow, how much water they’ll use and what are the true costs of this.”
Geez - why doesn’t the state of California and those Sanctuary cities just invite more illegals to move there. Uncontrolled immigration has its consequences. You asked for it and now you got it. Difficult to have sympathy for California.
Acre-feet per acre might not be the most appropriate metric.
How about dollars per acre-foot or calories for human consumption per acre-foot.
If we use the last one alfalfa is going to come off poorly, because producing meat or milk is very inefficient per acre.
IOW, six acre-feet per acre might be quite efficient if each acre-foot produces 10M calories. Not so much if it only results in 1M calories.
Note: I have zero idea whether these numbers are even orders of magnitude within range of actual calories per acre-foot.
You’ll often hear the CA almond industry blamed for the loss of honey bees lately — Colony Collapse Disorder etc.
Bees getting trucked out there by the billions...(long story, do a search for “bees, almonds, monoculture.”)
How did the almond get so big? Who’s eating them all? I’ve gone years without eating one. In fact, put me in the candy aisle and I’ll de-select Almond Joy every time.
Seriously. What are they doing with all these nuts?
Slowly I turned...! Down with milk chocolate! Destroy it! We need more -- Mounds more -- dark chocolate and coconuts. The only reason coconuts are scarce is the size of the bee you'd need. As for chocolate, you don't need bees at all. Women will do it.
Alfalfa? That’s grown practically all over the country.
Ha ha!
My California sister said Oprah is trucking in water every day for watering her lawn. Nice if you can afford it........ The problem is she is tearing up the country road she lives on with her trucks.
WOnder why this doesn’t have a news crew filming it.
That would be a great story FOX could cover.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.