Posted on 11/09/2018 12:08:07 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
The Great War of 1914-1918 was the defining event of our time: a lost generation of millions dead or maimed; mournful widows and orphans; empires toppled and nations shattered; Western civilization damaged; vast treasures sacrificed. And in war's aftermath, democracies stillborn and totalitarianism and vengeance enthroned.
How did it happen? Keegan, despite his vast expertise, confesses that even when one knows what happened, it is difficult to explain why.
"The First World War is a mystery. Its origins are mysterious. So is its course. Why did a prosperous continent, at the height of its success as a source and agent of global wealth and power and at one of the peaks of its intellectual and cultural achievement, choose to risk all it had won for itself and all it offered to the world in the lottery of a vicious and local internecine conflict? Why, when the hope of bringing the conflict to a quick and decisive conclusion was everywhere dashed to the ground within months of its outbreak, did the combatants decide nevertheless to persist in their military effort, to mobilise for total war and eventually to commit the totality of their young manhood to mutual and existentially pointless slaughter?"
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
I’ve never understood WWI. Glad to hear even the experts think the same way. But for WWI, no WWII...
One word: Stupidity.
I can tell you why WWII happened...because not enough Germans died on their homeland during WWI. It’s amazing the kind of wars the masses support when they think they won’t be harmed.
Most of the principal participants in the war wanted a war of some type for their own reasons but nobody could have wanted the one they actually got. Great Britain was the exception, having quite enough other irons in the fire in 1914, notably Home Rule for Ireland, a conflagration that did pop up the Easter Rising in 1916 in the middle of the war. The situation in the Balkans generally was incredibly fluid due to the retreat of the Ottoman empire and the attempt by the creaky Austro-Hungarian empire and the Romanov dynasty to move in on the territory, where nations newly created out of the Balkan Wars vied with the Austrians for possession of the turf. The Austrians simply occupied Sarajevo and dared anyone to do anything about it. The Serbs had experienced a bloody palace revolution that placed one party in and the other in a mood for revenge. It was the latter party who had the Serbian Black Hand, and they were fine with starting a war with Austria so that the ones they regarded as usurpers would get thrown out of government.
There was a peace faction and a war faction in Austrian government, and it was the head of peace faction, Francis Ferdinand, who got assassinated. The war faction deliberately made impossible demands and the Serbs acceded to all but one to keep peace. That wasn't what the Austrians had in mind.
What is amazing is how this one incident ballooned into Germany invading Belgium at the other end of Europe, not just that it happened but how fast it happened. There was a European diplomatic community that had been very successful in defusing such crises just prior to 1914, but it was overwhelmed by the speed at which events took place. The general view was that once mobilization started it couldn't be stopped, which was true of such nations as Russia and France, but as Barbara Tuchman revealed in her remarkable Guns Of August the Germans actually did have a plan for a partial mobilization and Moltke misled the Kaiser when he said it couldn't be stopped. "Your uncle would have given me another answer," said the Kaiser, some of the saddest words in history.
Empires were dying and younger nations springing up from the ashes were eager to grab as much land and resources from the former empires.
Technology made warfare much more deadly and the warring entities didn’t learn from the American civil war and marches their young men off into the abattoir of battle.
Whole generations of English, French and German were lost (Americans were loses were bad but compared to Europeans, not so much)
Partially because Britain and France didn’t like the new kid on the block, Germany.
I read somewhere that when the soldiers returned to their trenches after celebrating Christmas together in 1914, that was the exact time of the point of no return on the suicide of Christian Western Civilization - and the subsequent horrors of Marxism, Naziism, materialism, post-modernism, etc... that WWI would unleash on the 20th century.
Darryl Bates: What started it?
Col. Andy Tanner: I don’t know. Two toughest kids on the block, I guess. Sooner or later, they’re gonna fight.
Everything was set in place. Plans, modern (for its time) equipment, transportation, troops, large navies ready to go. All it took was a spark for the excuse to commit.
Enter the Black Hand of the Serbians, the clumsy assassination of a third rate Austrian prince and an arrangement of mutual defense treaty agreements.
The war of kings. It wasn’t really a surprise to them or a mystery.
I recommend the YouTube channel: The Great War. For the last four years they’ve done a weekly installment of what happened in WWI exactly 100 years ago. Obviously next week’s edition will finish the series. I started view about 2 months ago and am now in the middle of 1915. I thought I knew a lot about WWI (I taught history) but I learn something new in each 10 minute episode. They also have specials on the run up to the war. They cover just about every aspect of the war—the Eastern Front, the Middle East, Africa and the Pacific—not just the Western Front.
One interesting thing I learned is the one man in the Austro-Hungarian leadership who was dead-set against any war was Archduke Ferdinand.
Mmmmm....well...perhaps not. But there would have been war. Were the Japanese emboldened by the antics of Hitler? Perhaps. But they had been well prepared to unleash hell after years and years of, what they perceived to be, abuse at the hands of the US. Probably starting with Teddy Roosevelt.
My bigger question is why did WE get involved?
Mystery?
Among many other reasons, war through the 20th century eradicated the demographic threat to centuries of societal control mechanisms-the Deep State
Vietnam and the domestic chaos flowing out of it was the first beginnings of serious opposition to the DS
Britain shouldn’t have even been involved!
“The First World War is a mystery. Its origins are mysterious. So is its course. Why did a prosperous continent, at the height of its success as a source and agent of global wealth and power and at one of the peaks of its intellectual and cultural achievement, choose to risk all it had won for itself and all it offered to the world in the lottery of a vicious and local internecine conflict? Why,
Same could be said of Wisconsin electing a radical socialist Democrat who has pledged more or less to turn the state from prosperity, $500,000 budget surplus years in a row. 2.9% unemployment, hosts of new manufacturing jobs, and low property taxes back into the Governor Doyal days with near bankruptcy, 9% unemployment, high taxes, drive manufactures and farmers out of the state, and allow the Teachers Union bosses to set property taxes. Why? Time for a Change many say. Perhaps the same was somehow true back in Europe’s 1913-14.
Exactly. Germany was no threat to their empire. Britain probably would have been better frankly allying with Germany and not France.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.