Posted on 06/16/2019 6:41:56 PM PDT by Beave Meister
FBI at hearing about Crowdstrike: the EPITOME of Ridiculous BS
DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Agent Smith, you testified that the Russians hacked the DNC computers, is that correct?
FBI AGENT JOHN SMITH: That is correct.
DEF ATT: Upon what information did you base your testimony?
AGENT: Information found in reports analyzing the breach of the computers.
DEF ATT: So, the FBI prepared these reports?
AGENT: (cough) . (shift in seat) No, a cyber security contractor with the FBI.
DEF ATT: Pardon me, why would a contractor be preparing these reports? Do these contractors run the FBI laboratories where the server was examined?
AGENT: No.
DEF ATT: No? No what? These contractors dont run the FBI Laboratries?
AGENT: No. The laboratories are staffed by FBI personnel.
DEF ATT: Well I dont understand. Why would contractors be writing reports about computers that are forensically examined in FBI laboratories?
AGENT: Well, the servers were not examined in the FBI laboratory. (silence)
DEF ATT: Oh, so the FBI examined the servers on site to determine who had hacked them and what was taken?
AGENT: Uh .. no.
DEF ATT: They didnt examine them on site?
AGENT: No.
DEF ATT: Well, where did they examine them?
AGENT: Well, uh .. the FBI did not examine them?
DEF ATT: What?
(Excerpt) Read more at threader.app ...
Thanks for the link.
BFL
Bkmk Q&A
Seth rich begs to differ
Oh wait !
Is this MADE UP? Did this questioning actually take place?
AH!! I was suspicious because NO ONE on OUR side would ask such PRECISE GREAT QUESTIONS! I should have known .shame on me.
He should have been held in Contempt of Court and Criminally7 charged with Perjury for testifying about something her has no direct knowledge about.
As well as [fiction] in the headline.
The problem isn’t that we can’t figure out what happened. The problem is that too many people who are allegedly on “our side” don’t want any more of the truth to come out. They are much more afraid of the Deep State than they are of the voters.
The sad part is, all this was largely known before the Russia Collusion story ever got started, and how many knew it was phony and went along with it anyway.
So true, but they count on the “ attention span” being short and once said its truth no matter what the reality....
Such is the nature of todays sound bite, click bait media misrepresentation world.
Due to comments made way down in the text, I am left not sure that the “exchange” between the FBI person and the “Def att” is a fiction - a projection of what such an exchange would look like, or an actual exchange.
If it is a fiction, I think in this day and age and with the stupid casual use of such fictions that pass as facts all the time these days, I think it is a stupid way of tring to present the actual facts that are known.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.