Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IDIOTS GUIDE for "Fossil Fuel(s)"
Stanwooddave | 01/26/2021 | Stanwooddave

Posted on 01/26/2021 2:01:19 PM PST by Stanwood_Dave

IDIOTS GUIDE for "Fossil Fuel(s)"

1.) Fossil Fuel(s) come from decaying dead dinosaur's.

2.) What is the Name of the Process that ONLY allows dead dinosaur's to convert from a "mass of body tissue" (you know, the same tissue the Pro-Death / Pro Abortion speak of) to oil?


TOPICS: Education; History; Humor; Science
KEYWORDS: pterodactyl; stegosaurus; trex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
IDIOTS GUIDE for "Fossil Fuel(s)"

1.) Fossil Fuel(s) come from decaying dead dinosaur's.

2.) What is the Name of the Process that ONLY allows dead dinosaur's to convert from a "mass of body tissue" (you know, the same tissue the Pro-Death / Pro Abortion speak of) to oil?

3.) Do you get more miles per gallon say from a T-REX vs a Stegosaurus or a Pterodactyl? The reason for this question, is George Noory, of coast to coast radio fame, had some clown on saying scientist could identify said Fossil Fuel(s) in this manner.

4.) What is the formula for how much / many {"mass of body tissue"} dinosaur's to make a single gallon of "Fossil Fuel(s)?" This is not a miles per gallon question, rewritten.

5.) This questions is for the NON Believers: (personally, I'm a non believer in Fossil Fuel(s) wink, wink. Why are there no oil wells at any of the human grave yards, on planet Earth?????? NOTE to the smartest person in the room, there are some really old grave yards on the planet Earth.

6.) Could dinosaur's Read?

7.) Where are the signs? Were the signs in English? Signs??? What in the hell is this guy talking about? HINT: This way to the (dinosaur's only) grave yard.

Ok, ok, I get it. This question has you thinking I've been standing out in the sun too long without a hat. The purpose of this question is to put an end to the Fossil Fuel(s) LIE!!!

8.) Were dinosaur's racist / nationalist? I could have hour's of fun just with this question alone.

I do have a couple of other questions, but I'll save those for the smartest people in the room. You know, the people with "PHD's" Piling it HIGH & DEEP!

Ok, just one more for now.

9.) How old do you think the planet Earth is? Now, keep that number in mind. I don't need to know the answer, but you do.

Is the Planet Earth known as a planet with water over approx. 75% percent covering it?

Is there any new water since the Planet Earth was created? Answer, not only NO!! But "F*@#K" NO!! Were there Dinosaurs on the Planet Earth?

My final question to the Environmentalist.

What's another name for an Environmentalist? Answer: Dinosaur Urine Drinking Idiots. (TM / Copyright July 27th, 2020.)

Now you know why, not to drink the Kool-Aid. Wink-Wink!! Hint, how old did you say the planet Earth was / is?

1 posted on 01/26/2021 2:01:19 PM PST by Stanwood_Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stanwood_Dave

i had someone argue with me that the earth will run out of coal if we do not end its use. he said it would take an extinction event to create more coal. i asked how much coal is still available and he did not know. i asked how much coal we use and he did not know. i asked him how he then could say we are going to run out of coal?

he said because it is finite and we are not making more.

ugh


2 posted on 01/26/2021 2:09:33 PM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stanwood_Dave

Duh, no. Scientists, sons of fathers they never knew, have changed their argument. Now they claim that oil came from decomposing vegetation—vegetation that, apparent to their delusions, also grows and rots under oceans.


3 posted on 01/26/2021 2:11:59 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stanwood_Dave

A study of shifting magnetic field and outer core and the relation of those events to increasing methane leaks and blowouts will yield even more laughs (methane leaks pertaining to ozone depletion, lack of magnetic protection from solar/cosmic rays also causing ozone depletion). The climate change retardation is hilarious in light of the effects of an outer core shift (spurring leaks) and less strength in parts of the geomagnetic field (less protection for ozone against solar ejections, routine rays, etc.).


4 posted on 01/26/2021 2:22:35 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stanwood_Dave

Methane is often encountered over oil deposits. Another good question is, “Where does the methane on lifeless planets come from?”

Methane has also been said to have come from dinosaur excretions before the goalpost of rotting plants was added. In academic hoodoo speech, that’s “metabolizing plant matter” or some similar vaguery.


5 posted on 01/26/2021 2:29:21 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

Have you ever gone to rural Ireland. You smell the peat for miles. Its grass that grows every year, covering every inch of land. Then it dies, every year. New grass grows over old to the point where dead grass lies thickly over thousands of layers of grass that has died before. And the Irish literally cut logs of dead grass called peat. They bring it in to their fire places and heat their homes with it. In the North Sea there was land that had been above water a mere 5000 years ago. The land between England and Norway has been named Doggerland. Look it up. It too had thousands of layers of grass. And we harvest that grassland as well when we drill North Sea oil. Peat, Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas are all the same thing, dead grass. And its renewable. Every year we flare off excess Natural Gas from oil wells and land fills. There is a lot of carbon locked with oxygen and hydrogen. A never ending supply. And as we burn it, setting the elements free, they are adsorbed even more readily by the increasing plant life. And more carbon based fuels will be made.


6 posted on 01/26/2021 2:32:15 PM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stanwood_Dave

Please post your article in the Body of Thread section, not the Body of Comments!


7 posted on 01/26/2021 2:50:30 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Trust the plan of the 17th letter of the English alphabet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stanwood_Dave

I have a theory that the knowledge of what is true, is infinitesimally small. In fact, what we knew in 1020 and what we know in 2020 is really not that different.

Another theory I hold, is that the Earth is drawing from a source we cannot comprehend at this time. It is larger today than when the continents were approximately one land mass. The Gravity would then be less, allowing for giant species. There is so much to know if we look inward into the planet. We as a species use our time looking outward, to a place we may never truly travel to or know. Yet we barely know the mysteries that are right beneath our feet.

We don’t know if more or less water is created within the planet. It seems that more oil is being created. It also seems that coal has been mined and there are man designed creations deep under the Earth.

There are so many mysteries, and the answer to “what is” is all around us.


8 posted on 01/26/2021 3:06:45 PM PST by Glad2bnuts (“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Look at it this way Light fro the sun hits the earth.

Plants use Photosynthesis to convert the sunlight into plant matter, leaves and wood. The leaves fall into a swamp where over thousands of years they build up, then get covered by some Cataclysm. The eaves then break sown into coal.

So when you burn the coal you are actually using fossilized sunlight.

OUCH! Twisted my arm patting myself on the back for that one!


9 posted on 01/26/2021 4:04:55 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Democrats have declared us to be THE OBSOLETE MAN in the Twilight Zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stanwood_Dave

OMG, this makes my head hurt! Fossil Fuels actually come from decayed plant matter, 99% of which came from ancient oceanic plankton that settled to the bottom of the ocean which over time and via plate tectonics were pushed into the earth’s mantle to gradually convert the mass into petroleum via high amounts of pressure and heat. The remaining 1% comes from ancient terrestrial plant matter that seeped into the earth’s crust and was converted into petroleum via similar methods to the oceanic plankton.


10 posted on 01/26/2021 4:14:05 PM PST by Intar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

That is a pretty neat explanation of the coal formation theory. Well done! :)


11 posted on 01/26/2021 5:06:29 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

Uranium/plutonium reactor at the earth’s core.


12 posted on 01/26/2021 6:03:22 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

The ChiComs are building hundreds of coal fired electric generating plants. The seem to think there will be plenty of coal to feed them. I’ve read that they are trying to add a lot of electric cars powered by coal generating plants to reduce dependence on foreign oil.


13 posted on 01/26/2021 6:07:05 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

Maybe, but wouldn’t that form plutonium as a waste product?


14 posted on 01/26/2021 6:24:00 PM PST by Glad2bnuts (“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Aanaerobic decomposition. Just like anearobic digestion of cow shit or garbage in a landfill.


15 posted on 01/26/2021 7:23:35 PM PST by brianr10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: poinq

Actually, all coal deposits in America and Europe, (possibly the entire planet), are entirely made of a specific type of tree bark. The deposit layers of which can only be produced in a hydraulic event. But yes, as to your greater point, hydrocarbons are deposits of what was plant matter.


16 posted on 01/26/2021 7:40:25 PM PST by D Rider ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Intar

Oh, suuuure it is......

Sorry, just kidding.


17 posted on 01/26/2021 9:20:50 PM PST by moonhawk (And then the cock crowed for the third time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

There must have been a Hell of a lot of those trees....


18 posted on 01/26/2021 9:23:45 PM PST by moonhawk (And then the cock crowed for the third time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: brianr10
"Aanaerobic decomposition."

Yes. Thanks. I like the phrase, anaerobic decomposition, much more than "metabolizing plant matter."

On oil coming from decomposition of algae and/or other ocean organisms, trillions of microscopic biologists run around the ocean floor to make sure that all of that crude with an API gravity of more than 10 (lighter than water, by far the majority of crude oil) goes down and stays down instead of floating up. ;D

And methane is heavy, too, except for the methane released by mankind's evil drilling (re. temporary ozone depletions). That way, only the carbon is causing global warming. ;D

And there's never any increased outer core movement or occasional deviation of the north magnetic pole to indicate such increase, so the amount of methane leakage always stays the same. ;D

Sorry, got carried away with that sarcasm arousal. The climate change canard is a scam. Mankind's technological ejaculations come nowhere near the magnificent pollution caused by volcanoes, natural methane leakage, wildfires, etc. We're rather impotent in comparison.

On oil, well, yeah. Without some great discovery or invention, at the rate that we're using oil, prices will go up...and up. Seeing what can feasibly be pushed out of the ground at today's low prices, I'd give ten years at the most for adequate realization of the situation (see ultralight roadsters for people and rails for freight).


19 posted on 01/26/2021 11:53:03 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

Don’t have the physics in front of me and my memory isn’t what it used to be, the resonance capture aspect of U238 made the reactions virtually circular. My former supervisor, a brilliant man, told me about it. The theory explains, in part, hydrocarbons.


20 posted on 01/27/2021 4:08:16 AM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson