Posted on 09/02/2021 7:16:46 PM PDT by SteveH
why are so many women evolutionarily inclined to be liberal/socialist/communist/fascist?
my observation is that many more women than men seem to fit these categories, which imho differ only in degree.
my own conjecture:
women have been evolved to submit to the force and power of authority. in prehistory, women, having generally less strength and less weight than men, have taken follower social status as the primary way in which both they and their offspring maximize their survival and reproduction chances.
the us constitution upholds minimal government. minimal government is antithetical to maximum force and maximum power.
thus, the us constitution is often belittled as "unimportant" "irrelevant" "wrong" or "patriarchical" by many women.
many ancient cultures apparently implicitly understood this and thus usually did not give women any chance to assume a position of ruling a group.
one of the few ancient cultures that survives is islam. islam does not seem to offer women any leadership roles or any rights equal to those of males. yet, many women support islam, even while asserting feminist ideology.
the evolutionary attraction of women to force and power is the only explanation that i can come up with that resolves the dichotomy of women supporting a culture which denies womens' rights.
by allowing women equal or better political power, therefore, it could be construed as opening the gates of modern civilization to the islamic, socialist, or communist strains of cultural barbarianism.
i am not certain whether a solution exists, but perhaps someone should find a solution quickly, before modern civilization is overrun.
before the 19th amendment passed, the destructive effect of women on modern civilization was not a significant problem.
what am i missing?
Only since the start of the human species.
................................................
Funny, and also axiomatic!
Your “test” is flawed at least for me and my circle. My wife and I and many of our friends would just leave the cafe with our loved ones. As opposed to getting caught up in the ensuing panic. Human panic is an immediate and very dangerous threat to my security.
Sorry, but that is my world forced on me by the hard lessons of life.
Women age like milk, men age like wine! Sad women think their 20s will last forever!🤣
.................................................
Your entire post is a very perceptive and accurate description of a large percentage of the female population in the western world today. Kudos to you!
“Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream.” —Rush Limbaugh, Undeniable Truth of Life #24
Rush. [sigh]
“deskbound bureaucrats with a sense of inflated importance and no appreciable real world skills beyond inventing excuses to regulate?
ouch”
Serious as a heart attack. In the end at least half of the net worth men accumulate comes from deferred expenses. People spend a large portion of their money on things which improve their lives. When these things break men tend to repair them instead buying new ones or paying someone else to repair them. It seems small until you accumulate the proceeds with interest throughout a lifetime. The male method requires a distinct lack of social infrastructure. The female method requires extra pay for feminine skills and extra value on structured services.
It’s not prejudice if it’s a fact.
“The women’s liberation movement is best when viewed from behind.”
Feminism gives this an ideological sheen or spin. Younger women support the left because they feel or have been told that they have been oppressed by the patriarchy, and also that their "reproductive rights" are threatened by conservatives. Older women and married women don't support progressivism to the same degree.
Additionally, there is the idea of women as more maternal and nurturing. The Democrats are seen as the encouraging, permissive "mommy party" and the Republicans as the repressive, forbidding "daddy party." This is all something that radical suffragists saw coming as a result of women's suffrage, but it took 50 or 60 years for it to become a reality.
I’m sorry .
I didn’t realize I shouldn’t use big words with you.
I will try to keep it at People magazine level for you from now on.
I’m sure that explains the history of mankind for the 99.9 % of the time men were in control.
It was a virtual paradise on earth in those days, right???
And the folks who have betrayed this country and are causing its downfall are mostly what?
Male or female?
No, too many cases of men driving their wives, girlfriends, and/or daughters to the abortion clinics to pass that one off on women.
Welfare is evil.
It’s destructive and should be eliminated.
Charity needs to be back in the hands of churches where there is accountability.
But look at who just increased food stamps.
Not a woman.
I said vote, not hold office. Do you not think ‘the woman’s vote’ pushed THE ENTIRE COUNTRY left?
Yeah, about the double standard there.
Men certainly have shown no reluctance in sleeping around sowing their wild oats and it’s more applauded than condemned.
What’s good for one is good for the other. If men are going to be so loose sexually and “not the marrying type”, they have no basis for complaint when women are.
If they don’t like women doing the very thing they do, then maybe if the kept their pants zipped, women would be more circumspect too.
No.
I think election fraud did.
Eve ate first. Perfect environment. Your claim is that if men were better, women wouldn’t act that way. The Bible’s claim is yes, they would and DID. Your claim is a copout.
It’s for the same reason women are on average more religiously minded then men. Being woke has replaced Christianity in our modern society.
Tribal response, no point in debating.
No, I’m not saying if men were better women would not make poor decisions. Scripture is clear that women are more easily deceived than men. However, if men were better leaders, they would do their job and stop them, or try to stop them, from making bad decisions. They would catch the deception and at least try to correct it.
God gave Adam the instructions concerning the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. That was done before Eve was created. Adam was also given dominion over the earth. He was responsible for taking care of it.
He was with Eve when Satan interacted with her. There were a couple times he could have and should have intervened. One was when she told the serpent that they were not even to touch it. Right there was an indication something was wrong. Whether Adam told her something different that what God told him, or she interpreted it wrong, the fact that what she told the serpent was not accurate. He should had stopped her then and corrected her. For that matter, he should have stopped the conversation in the first place and ordered the serpent off.
Then when she reached out and picked the fruit, he had another opportunity to stop her, and he didn’t. Then he watched her eat, knowing full well they were not to, and then ate himself.
And when confronted by God, his first reaction was to blame shift.
He blamed both the woman AND God.
*It was that woman (blaming the woman) that You gave me (blaming God).*
Not an auspicious start for mankind.
And so now we still have men blaming women for all the ills of the world, as this thread testifies to.
I am NOT saying that all the problems of the world are all men’s fault.
What my contention is, is that not all the problems of the world are all women’s fault. And there are plenty of examples throughout history that bear that out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.