Posted on 06/08/2022 2:33:47 PM PDT by BenLurkin
In the fall of 2018, protesters opposed to Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination disrupted the hearings and chased one senator into an elevator and another out of a restaurant. Some “protesters broke through Capitol Police barricades and rushed up the steps to the Capitol Rotunda.” Other protesters “pushed past a police line, storming up steps to pound on the doors of the U.S. Supreme Court.” All of this led to hundreds of arrests, which predictably were treated with lenience on the theory that political protesters breaching the Capitol was no big deal.
In March 2020, standing on the steps of the Supreme Court, Chuck Schumer bellowed to a crowd of pro-abortion protesters:
I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have unleashed the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.
In September 2021, a mob of pro-abortion protesters from “ShutDownDC” descended upon Justice Kavanaugh’s home...
a pro-abortion group “RuthSentUs” publicly shared maps to the homes of the six Republican-appointed justices, and sent protests there to intimidate the justices....yet Democrats such as Schumer and Anne Kuster dismissed the mob threat to the Court as no big deal. The Biden White House pointedly refused to condemn either the leak or the targeting of homes,...made no move to prosecute the protesters, again on the theory that breaking federal law in a political protest in D.C. is no big deal.
A bipartisan bill to beef up security for the justices unanimously passed the Senate, but Nancy Pelosi blocked it in the House.
Meanwhile, violence by the group “Jane’s Revenge” has escalated, including just last night, firebombing a crisis pregnancy center in Buffalo.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Not saying this is the way it is, but what if this “gunman” is bogus and was just there to send a threatening message?
What if he is really a paid informant?
What if he is another Ray Epps?
Just saying.
If he is then the Democrats own this “Ray Epps.”
We don’t call it the ‘Deep State’ for nothing.
Lacey Wooten-Holway, Kavanaugh’s cretinous neighbor who doxed
Him, is probably bummed she didn’t get the chance to have the justice’s blood on her hands.
How I loathe these people. I really do
Newbie stirring up trouble. Get lost.
The FBI will handle this before the sun goes down.
You’re just another Bush-loving kissass suck up.
Altogether now, what should NR lay off from doing?
100% facts. They'd also hope it emboldens someone to take out Thomas or Alito. The left is totally subsribed to the philosophy of the ends justify the means which is why all left wing regime are built on a foundation made from the skulls of their political enemies.
Wow, for National Review that dangerously close to taking a stand against democrats. Not really, it's sort of a not-really-sternly written letter politely asking them to stop urging violent extremism all the time. But for National Review that's saying something.
Pretty sure they needed to do that BEFORE Armed Assassin Arrested at Kavanaugh’s House
Don’t be making credible threats against sitting officeholders.
This is why congress needs to be moved to the center of the US, like Kansas.
Seems like the justices could have avoided this is they had just looked at the election evidence. God is not pleased with them
We live in a country where Democrats like Schumer and Waters encourage violence against those with whom they disagree and the Democrats and their corporate partners engage in the manipulation of the electoral process. In addition, the FBI and much of the rest of the criminals and buffoons whom we think of as “law enforcement “ turn a blind eye to the criminal behavior of the Democrats or actively participate in it.
What is the appropriate response?
The appropriate response is not to type threats against sitting lawmakers on a public forum.
Other than that, make your own mind up.
What I said was if the one side starts killing our people, and “law enforcement “ does nothing or enables it, the correct response is retaliation. How that transmutes into a direct call for violence against current officialdom, I have no idea. But if for all your unhappiness with what goes on you are little more than a serf who kneels to his “betters” no matter what crimes they commit, then your pusillanimous comment makes sense.
Maybe after Putin removes DC for us?
Well, take a look at your comment #16 on this thread.
You’ll note that an Admin Moderator removed it.
Apparently, they concur that it was enough of a direct threat to warrant removal.
Personally, I think they did you a favor.
Dems fully support this violence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.