Posted on 09/05/2022 4:53:24 PM PDT by nickcarraway
A SUPPOSED time traveller from the year 3311 has published a bizarre confession tape in which he presented three photos of what he claimed is the future.
The anonymous man’s time travel confession emerged in March 2019, after he shared his story with online paranormal investigators. The supposed time traveller had his face blurred and voiced distorted in the video but he claimed he is the real deal. Speaking to a camera for YouTube channel ApexTV, the time traveller produced three photos, which he said he took on a mission in the year 3311. The time traveller said he has an “extremely interesting story” to tell – a story about his past and his future.
“I got into the teleportation machine again but this time it brought me to a very different place and I took a picture of that place as well. Let me show you that picture.”
He then pulled out a photo of a building, which he said is a typical house in the far future.
And his last picture was of a flying vehicle passing over some homes and trees.
The three photos, the time traveller boldly claimed, are supposed to back up his questionable story
Time travel news: The supposed time traveller showed forged pictures of the future (Image: APEXTV) According to the time traveller, he snapped the pictures after he was elected to take part in a secret time travel operation in the 1990s.
He said he was selected due in no small part to his accomplishments at school in the area of computer development.
And he argued the secrets of time travel were cracked through the mysterious applications of quantum computing.
He said: “I can’t say the name of that organisation but I can assure you that organisations like the one I’m describing, and many many more, not only exist but are carrying out secret programmes behind closed doors.”
Time travel news: Time traveller proof
Viral video of 'strange figure' sparks claims 'aliens' are among us However, all three photos presented by the supposed time traveller are clever edits of pre-existing photographs, meant to look as if they are from the future.
The first photo is an edit of a mountain forest valley wallpaper hosted on the website 7-themes.com with a floating city pasted in.
The second photo is actually an edited photo of the Antilia building, which is the private home of Reliance Industries chairman Mukesh Ambani in South Mumbai, India.
Many of the people who saw the video, saw through the deception and called out ApexTV in the comment section.
YouTube viewer Mike Mathieu said: “These ‘pictures’ look about as real as Japanese animation.”
Vignesh Baidu said: “Next time at least take a selfie so that we can clarify it’s not photoshopped.”
And Richard Labeja said: “The pictures look fake, especially the floating city.
“There perspectives, lighting and contrast look severely inaccurate.”
Not according to Professor William Hiscock of Montana State University, or at least not in the form described in the ApexTV video.
The time travel expert said the effects of the time-illation effect allow people to move forward in time but not backwards.
He said: “Time travel into the past, which is what people usually mean by time travel, is a much more uncertain proposition.
“There are many solutions to Einstein's equations of General Relativity that allow a person to follow a timeline that would result in her (or him) encountering herself – or her grandmother – at an earlier time.
“The problem is deciding whether these solutions represent situations that could occur in the real universe, or whether they are mere mathematical oddities incompatible with known physics.”
“That’s not bad. When I was in High School there was a guy in the next school district named Harry Dickey.”
When I was stationed in Germany, there was a Major assigned to brigade HQ who’s last name was Dick... Major Dick
He was anything but though, in fact he was one of the funniest, most laid back officers I’ve ever met.
Oh,I wasn’t complaining.😏
i know... 8^)
“Nice and blurry, like any UFO or bigfoot photo.”
There has been hundreds of (unfortunately) crystal clear photos of Bigfoot disgracing the covers of People magazine and other such rags since at least 2008.
Nothing near even only a full second.
Think "micro-seconds."
Regards,
John Masters, a Ghurka officer, encountered a Sgt Fucurupher in India in WW2.
Good English name. One of the doctors who helped kill Geo Washington with bleeding him of a quarter of his blood mass was Dr Elisha Dick.
ping
Yes, I meant to say 7 milliseconds (or something like that).
The Earth’s future in 49 years is to be in a much different location. Does the Earth’s gravity continue to pull you along as you travel through time somehow?
At least his name isn’t Hank.
Hey, the only thing they're allowing you to use in the future are Instamatic cameras!
The train I mentioned in post #64 would behave like any other train on Earth would. It would be affected by gravity the same way, etc. The only difference is that because it is moving close to the speed of light around the track, clocks on that train would run much slower than clocks not on the train. So the train jumps into the Earth’s future significantly.
Again, it’s almost impossible to believe. But Einstein is right about this. An experiment using not a train but the Concorde proves it.
This is not the best article on that, but it’s a start.
https://srinath96.blogspot.com/2016/11/time-dilation-in-concorde-airplane.html
I don’t actually look at it as ‘time travel.’ After all, we are all traveling forward in time, at the same rate.
What the ‘time travel’ hypothesis seems to be saying is that the person (object) ‘traveling’ is actually slowing down his rate of forward travel (in time). The rest of the universe goes on into the future, and when the ‘traveler’ comes to rest, he is in our common future without having experienced the intervening years.
‘Travelers’ stay relatively young, others age, and there is no ‘going back’ in time for the traveler.
> After all, we are all traveling forward in time, at the same rate. <
That was Newton’s view of time. It makes all the sense in the world. But Einstein showed that Newton’s view was wrong. The rate of time is affected by relative speed. So if two objects are moving relative to each other, those objects will not be moving forward in time at the same rate.
We don’t notice this because the rate difference is very small at everyday speeds. It only becomes noticeable when the speeds are great - near the speed of light - or if you have very sensitive atomic clocks.
Let’s say you and I both have such a clock. The times agree to the nanosecond. You jump on a plane, go to Europe, then return. When you land our clocks will not agree. Your clock will have run slower simply because of the relative motion between us.
The difference is how much you “time-travelled” into my future. It will be way, way less than a second because your plane went nowhere near the speed of light.
This experiment was actually done with the Concorde. The clocks differed by the amount Einstein’s equation said they would.
Which is so weird because they found a camera from a stone age fa mah leeeee that used the same technique via a little bird in the housing. Which proves that a time traveler DID go back!
I appreciate your post, Jack.
Kid in my HS was named Richard (Dick) Click. Instead of calling him Ricky, his parents unfortunately nicknamed him Dick.
I’ll bet he desperately worked to avoid getting to....
wait for it....
CHIEF swallower.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.