Scientist tests his theory and cooks the books to support the left’s climate narrative… major magazine publishes his work

American Thinker ^ | 09/10/2023 | Jack Hellner

[SeekAndFind]

It has been clear for a long time that the science is not settled regarding humans and our use of natural resources in relation to temperatures and climatic changes. The only thing that is settled is job and financial security for “scientists” who support the left’s “climate change” narrative. They’re guaranteed taxpayer-funded grants; jobs from Democrats, colleges, or the media that uses their authority to regurgitate leftist talking points and to push for the radical leftist agenda to destroy companies that produce reasonably priced energy and other products.

Here, a scientist admits that he essentially cooked the books to get published by what he called "prestigious" publications:

A California scientist admitted that he ‘left out the full truth’ about climate change, blaming it primarily on human causes, to get his study published in a prestigious science journal.

Patrick T. Brown, a lecturer at Johns Hopkins University and doctor of earth and climate sciences, admitted …  that he distorted the findings of his studies to appeal to the editors at Nature and Science magazines, which are prestigious online science journals.

‘And the editors of these journals have made it abundantly clear, both by what they publish and what they reject, that they want climate papers that support certain preapproved narratives—even when those narratives come at the expense of broader knowledge for society,’ Brown wrote….

It is an absolute shame that any organization is considered prestigious when they require indoctrination. Diversity of thought and debate is not allowed no matter what the facts are. Editors are worthless and dangerous when they think like lemmings.

How many lies were told to push the government edicts on COVID?

How many scientists and others were silenced by the government and the media if they dared disagree

[SeekAndFind]

How many doctors and scientists stayed silent instead of debating the government edicts because they wanted to be respected and were scared their livelihoods would be destroyed if they spoke up?

[joshua c]

the science is never settled

if there is no debate

it is all propaganda

the side doing the silencing are the liars

the LEFT are liars

[huldah1776]

only 25% of published NEW studies are replicated...$$$$$$$

[Inyo-Mono]

Bookmark.

[vpintheak]

Yes. Most people are cowards when it comes down to it. Especially if livelihoods are in danger.

[JimRed]

“Publish or perish” has consequences.