Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stanford neurobiologist says there is no such thing as 'free will'
American Thinker ^ | 10/21/2023 | Eric Utter

Posted on 10/21/2023 8:22:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

After more than 40 years of studying humans and other primates, Stanford neurobiologist Robert Sapolsky has reached the conclusion that virtually all human behavior is as far beyond our conscious control as the division of cells or the beating of our hearts. (Of course, he had to.)

Therefore, we mustn’t harshly judge such heretofore disdained folks as drunk drivers, serial criminals, Hamas terrorists, and those who bring 29 items to the “8 items or less” checkout lane.

Sapolsky said:

“The world is really screwed up and made much, much more unfair by the fact that we reward people and punish people for things they have no control over. We’ve got no free will. Stop attributing stuff to us that isn’t there.”

Yes, this screwed up world would be a much, much better place if we stopped rewarding and punishing people based on their behavior. Incredibly, Sapolsky is a MacArthur “genius” grant winner, proving that the people who bestow that award are utterly clueless. (Through no fault of their own, of course!) if (publir_show_ads) { document.write("" + ""); }

Indeed, the vast majority of neuroscientists and philosophers believe humans have at least some degree of free will. As do most of the rest of us. But perhaps we have no choice in the matter.

Sapolsky has a new book out, titled, Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will. (I bet he just had to write it!) Doesn’t sound much like “science” to me. But maybe we should ask Dr. Fauci.

The book chronicles neurochemical influences that contribute to human behaviors, and analyzes time, short or long, before we do what we do. Sapolsky had previously written a bestseller called, “Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst,” which won the Los Angeles Times Book Prize and received other accolades.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: churchofwoke; freewill; materialism; neurobiology; nonsense; pseudoscience; robertsapolsky; selfcontradiction; stanford; stanfordhalfwit; thenwhybelievehim; washeforcedtosaythat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 10/21/2023 8:22:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I will choose a path that’s clear.


2 posted on 10/21/2023 8:23:19 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If you choose not to decide
You still have made a choice

Freewill
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=urBpdyFCZmo&pp=ygUOZnJlZSB3aWxsIHJ1c2g%3D


3 posted on 10/21/2023 8:26:27 AM PDT by janetjanet998 (Legacy media including youtube are the enemy of the people and must die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hey Stupid,

Me calling you stupid was a choice, free will at work, got it?


4 posted on 10/21/2023 8:27:56 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Trump has all the right enemies, DeSantis has all the wrong friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

2nd post on this thread. That’s encouraging.


5 posted on 10/21/2023 8:29:58 AM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²e a truck through this law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thinking themselves wise, they become fools.


6 posted on 10/21/2023 8:30:43 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Don't blame me, my congressman is MTG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah? Well, He’s an idiot


7 posted on 10/21/2023 8:30:44 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A person can become a new creature. In fact, they can become born again.


8 posted on 10/21/2023 8:32:15 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

LOL!


9 posted on 10/21/2023 8:32:43 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

RE: Yeah? Well, He’s an idiot

LOL, did you say that out of your own ‘free will’? Or did the chemicals in your brain impel you to say it? LMAO !!


10 posted on 10/21/2023 8:32:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I read this and got a headache.
That was not my freewill so...he must be right?


11 posted on 10/21/2023 8:36:43 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Through Jesus Christ.


12 posted on 10/21/2023 8:37:08 AM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is that so?! He’s not God or a god!


13 posted on 10/21/2023 8:37:49 AM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

People know what lies are, but they believe them anyway. And when some one writes a book saying that is OK, you can be assured that the book will get lots of press.


14 posted on 10/21/2023 8:39:20 AM PDT by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I can argue both sides of this debate.

My first question would be; We know placebo’s work. How do they work if consciousness does not influence the final result?

Our free will is limited to the attributes available at the level or frequency of consciousness that we have attained.


15 posted on 10/21/2023 8:39:30 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No name given

Through Jesus Christ.


Yes. Nothing is more documented in ancient history than the life of Jesus. Yet, these know-it-all professors know little about him.


16 posted on 10/21/2023 8:41:13 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Another effort to remove personal responsibility for one's own choices and actions, using Biology.

The abuse of Science to try and ease the guilt of sin, will not work. It will still be there under all the lies.

17 posted on 10/21/2023 8:43:32 AM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah. But judging people for right wing views is still allowed


18 posted on 10/21/2023 8:45:17 AM PDT by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In all my reading and listening to various religions’ viewpoints, I only recall one woman saying God made a mistake when he allowed free will.

I mutter so many times “well, thanks to free will——
that serial killer abducted little children”
“those knockout game teens got away with it again—witnesses shut up”
or “the man who pushed the woman onto the subway tracks to get killed ran away.”

The human race commit so much evil they are again as in the time of Noah. IMO

A priest who wrote a book about his experiences as one of the hundreds of exorcists said the average person got the wrong idea from such things as the movie The Exorcist. “They think the power of Satan is overwhelmingly enormous and strong and an equal opponent to the goodness of God. But Satan is a small part of God’s creation and nowhere near being equal.”

Hope he was right.


19 posted on 10/21/2023 8:45:21 AM PDT by frank ballenger (“My job is to inform, not to convince.” St. Bernadette Soubirous )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
He's Skinnerean, let me guess his age. For a contemporary antidote, a little bit of Martin Seligman, who discovered "learned helplessness"
Starting around 1965, the favored explanations began to change radically. A person’s environment was considered less and less important in causing his behavior.

Just as with Freudianism, behaviorism’s main idea was counterintuitive (that is, it ran against common sense). The behaviorists insisted that all of a person’s behavior was determined only by his lifelong history of rewards and punishments. Actions that had been rewarded (a smile, for example, that had brought a caress) were likely to be repeated, and actions that had been punished were likely to be suppressed. And that was it.


20 posted on 10/21/2023 8:47:38 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson