Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heller: One Vote From Revolution
The Patriot Room ^ | June 26, 2008 | Bill Dupray

Posted on 06/26/2008 10:09:44 AM PDT by Bill Dupray

The tyranny of the liberals was almost complete. ONE MORE VOTE and they would be confiscating our guns. After that, they could have done whatever they wanted and an unarmed population of sheep could have done nothing about it. We know what our Founding Fathers did about that kind of tyranny.

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotroom.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2ndamendment; banglist; democrats; elections; guns; heller; nobama08; secondamendment; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2008 10:12:05 AM PDT by Bill Dupray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

If democraps win in November they will have that ONE VOTE.


2 posted on 06/26/2008 10:15:31 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"If democraps win in November they will have that ONE VOTE."

Don't worry. All of the "Principled Conservatives" are going to either vote third party or sit this one out to "send a message". The RATS will get more than one more vote thanks to the "Principled Conservatives".

3 posted on 06/26/2008 10:19:45 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"If democraps win in November they will have that ONE VOTE."

Don't worry. All of the "Principled Conservatives" are going to either vote third party or sit this one out to "send a message". The RATS will get more than one more vote thanks to the "Principled Conservatives".

4 posted on 06/26/2008 10:19:49 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray
The tyranny of the liberals was almost complete. ONE MORE VOTE and they would be confiscating our guns.

Not all lefties would have been happy with that...

Charging the 2000 presidential election was 'rigged', the DUmmies swore they were not going to allow it to happen again in 2004 (Kerry defeated like Al Gore in 2000).

Arming the Left: Is the time now?
Post from: Lori Price CLG (1000+ posts) Sun Feb-22-2004 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #10

16. Yes, spread the word, even if you *didn't* read it, that there *will* be riots! Yes! Riots, and a whole lot more!..."

Democratic Underground blogger ("happyslug": 1000+ posts) responds...

"if it is decided to fight, be prepared to fight, bring a backpack, entrenching tool, tent, and other equipment of an Infantrymen. You will need it for Bush and his supporters decides it is better to fight than to accept the will of the people, the fight to overthrow them will be a long fight."

"...it takes three things to overthrow a tyrant;...

1. Popular support, you must have the majority of the people on your side (i.e. Democracy, even the Communists and Islamics both try to show they have the Support of the Majority of the People),

2. Organization to perform the overthrow (This is why Madison wrote the First like he did, these are HOW you organize an opposition. Without the First it is hard to organize an opposition and any resistence organized in absence of the rights stated in the First tend to be as tyrannical as what you are opposing)

3. Weapons to push the issue if the leadership that is being overthrown tries to use force to stay in power. You have to be willing to answer force with force. Weapons do not overthrow a tyrant, weapons just protect the people who are overthrowing a tyrant."

"Now, you may say "Hay, you are talking about Islamic and/or Communists groups not 'Western Liberal resistence groups'". And you would be correct. As I said in the beginning the first step in a guerilla war against a tyrant is to first organize. The Islamic and Communists Groups were the best at organizing people. "Western Liberal Resistence Groups" were less effective in organizing resistence groups (And less liked by the CIA and KGB who tended to fund these groups, remember any war is expensive, money talks).

Furthermore since most Islamic and Communist groups tend to be the first groups outlawed they tend to go underground first. Once underground they start to organize and as other groups are outlawed those groups tend to join the opposition which tends to be either Islamic or Communistic. Once outlawed these groups also tend to be controlled by the most fanatic opponents of the Tyrants and these tend to be either Islamic or Communistic. Thus to oppose the Tyrants you have to support a side with enough discipline to get the job done and that tend to be Communist or Islamic."

"...Any weapons we resort to must be "real" weapons not pistols. i.e. Rifles and shotguns. Due to concerns of re-supply (you have to plan for a long battle) such weapons should be limited to very small number of different rounds. Generally restrict yourself to the following rounds:

5.56x 45 (.223 Remington) 7.62x 63 (30-06) 7.62x 51 (.308 Winchester or 7.62 NATO) 7.62 x 39 (7.62mm Russian 7.62 AK Round) 12 Gauge Shotgun. 30-30 Winchester."

"You have more weapons in the above calibers than any other calibers thus should be your first choice in weapons. Saying this I must point out I like the 7x57 and 7.92x57 Mauser rounds and the M1898 Mauser Bolt action Rifle, but the 7.92 (sometime called 8mm Mauser) but these rounds are less common than the above and thus harder to obtain when re-supply is needed (and re-supply will be needed if the struggle lasts for any length of time).

Re-supply of Ammunition has always been the bane of any military operations. Without ammunition you can not fight. To get you ammunition, it is easier if we can keep the number of different rounds to a minimum (i.e. 5.56x45 and 7.62x51). I list the 30-06 and 30-30 winchester rounds for these are two VERY popular rounds and ammunition for both are easy to obtain (the same with the 12 Gauge shotgun). I list the 7.62 AK round do to the huge number of SKSs and AKs imported since the fall of the Soviet Union. I list it for while there are probably more 30-30s and 30-06 rifles out they than 7.62 Aks and SKSs, the Aks and SKSs may very while outnumber the rifles in 5.56x45 and 7.62 NATO.

Also, if it is decided to fight, be prepared to fight, bring a backpack, entrenching tool, tent, and other equipment of an Infantrymen. You will need it for Bush and his supporters decides it is better to fight than to accept the will of the people, the fight to overthrow them will be a long fight."

[end of excerpts...but many other just as crazy thoughts found at the following link. This thread continued for THREE entire weeks before the moderator finally stepped in. But as of today, Wednesday, June 26, 2008, the thread is still up on the Democratic Underground website.-ETL]

Democratic Underground Discussion Board
Topic: "Arming the Left: Is the time now?":
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x41313

"Lori Price CLG (1000+ posts) Sun Feb-22-04 11:17 PM Response to Reply #10
16. Yes, spread the word, even if you *didn't* read it, that there *will* be riots! Yes! Riots, and a whole lot more!..."

_________________________________________________________

CLG Founder and Chair is Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.
CLG General Manager is Lori Price.

News Updates from Citizens for Legitimate Government (CLG)
http://www.legitgov.org/

Ready for Revolution? Join CLG's Revolution Tactics Group and Get Ready to Overthrow the Establishment.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CLG_Revolution_Tactics/

5 posted on 06/26/2008 10:23:21 AM PDT by ETL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

“ONE MORE VOTE and they would be confiscating our guns.”

Not until I was out of ammo, and possibly out of blood.


6 posted on 06/26/2008 10:26:07 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Too late for the gun issue at that level. The precedent has been set and a new court won't overturn it. Besides the conservative majority will continue to dominate for the next decade.
I rubbed it in to all my liberal acquaintances 7.5 years ago that when Bush was elected that the most important thing he would accomplish is to swing the court to the right side of issues. It really PO’d them and to this day I remind them every chance I get. This decision is defiantly going to give me some more liberal-socialist smashing ammunition. I will not miss a chance to remind them of their socialist failure to disarm our free society.
7 posted on 06/26/2008 10:26:28 AM PDT by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ETL

BRING IT! Ill take our chance over a bunch of limp wristed leftists who have never even held a firearm any day.


8 posted on 06/26/2008 10:26:42 AM PDT by AngryCapitalist (NOW is the time to stand and fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AngryCapitolist

One of the DUmmies is complaining about Republican pounding on the doors and windows to stop the count. Actually it was the Republican members of the Canvassing Board and members of the Press that wanted the doors opened to a room where the Domocrats had seized a Ballot Box.


9 posted on 06/26/2008 10:32:06 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Boy are these people delusional!
10 posted on 06/26/2008 10:37:30 AM PDT by Edgerunner (At the heart of every absurdity, lies a liberal lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

And you can tell them that thusly, since the Bill of Rights has now been upheld the defense of liberty is now protected and all subsequent INDIVIDUAL rights.

Their COLLECTIVE will never be able to crush us. Not without a fight.

Tell them calmly and politely and then watch the reaction.


11 posted on 06/26/2008 10:40:25 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray
Scalia notes how, if the liberals had their way, anyone not in a militia (not sure where one signs up for that nowadays) would be subject to having their guns confiscated.

Dude would be suprised at the number of militias in the U.S. Not exactly something they go out trumpeting to the masses...
12 posted on 06/26/2008 10:41:35 AM PDT by steel_resolve (We are living in the post-rational world where being a moron is an asset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
...The RATS will get more than one more vote thanks to the "Principled Conservatives".

If you cared so much about this, why didn't you and the rest of the GOP put up someone who could win the election? If you depended on conservatives to carry the win as opposed to what most of the GOP now is, then you ef'd up. The blame doesn't lay with the "principled conservatives" (as you intone, a bad thing), it is with the rest of the GOP.

Casting blame (albeit early blame - you actually KNOW what's coming, don't you). You knew it when his 'rightness' was coronated via the MSM and NYT without even going through 1/3 of the primaries.

13 posted on 06/26/2008 10:42:36 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AngryCapitolist
BRING IT! I'll take our chance over a bunch of limp wristed leftists who have never even held a firearm any day.

and wet their little panties at the report of a .38.

14 posted on 06/26/2008 10:43:43 AM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

Well Bill.....they will have to know who has the guns.


15 posted on 06/26/2008 10:43:45 AM PDT by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

And we will still have our guns.


16 posted on 06/26/2008 10:43:53 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

But please, we must make sure to be really nice to the other side on issues like this, maintain our decorum and civility and have a darn fine discussion over this stuff. Because it’s important that we make sure to follow the lead of Ivy League liberal Republicans whose soft, wuss-ass approach to dealing with our enemies has set us up for a continuing fall we are enduring. Great job, pussies.


17 posted on 06/26/2008 10:53:42 AM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Fortunately, the oldest justices on their last legs are Ginsberb and Stevens. Both super libs. It would be nice to replace them with good conservatives, but the makeup will not change if they retire. Also, if another 2A issue comes up, the Chief justice does not even have to grant certori since the issue has already been decided. The lower courts have to follow this ruling.


18 posted on 06/26/2008 11:01:39 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Why don't you climb down off your high horse and do some studying? First of all, we didn't get your damned memo directing us to vote for your own, pure candidate. It was a primary election and the majority of the votes (Not mine, mind you, not that it makes a damned bit of difference in your narrow mind!) were for John McCain. So, you and your ilk failed to muster a sufficient number of votes for your sufficiently pure enough candidate.

So, go ahead and sulk and whine and sit on your hands and send us a message. The problem is that the message you are sending is "I am a dupe of the RAT Party!"

Now run along and whimper somewhere else.

19 posted on 06/26/2008 11:28:28 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

This is true, I suppose — but only to a point. Even if we’d have lost Heller, most States have a arms bearing amendment without the “militia” ambiguity.

For instance, the Texas Constitution ...
- Section 23 - RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime.

Heller, had it gone the other way, would merely have ALLOWED the regulation of firearms — it wouldn’t have banned them. Unlike the abortion decision, Heller would’ve simply left gun regulation within the purview of state’s rights.

Would’ve been a bad decision, nonetheless ... but it wouldn’t have changed anything. States have been operating as if they had free reign to regulate gun ownership for decades ... some, like DC, choose to ban. Some, like Texas and New Hampshire, chose not to. That would’ve continued.

Luckily, we don’t have to continue fighting state-by-state anymore.

On a related note ... Texas is looking to move from concealed carry to open carry.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5851852.html

H


20 posted on 06/26/2008 11:32:06 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor (Jack Bauer for President 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson