Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A look ahead at governor's runoff (Nikki Haley)
Charleston Post & Courier ^ | June 10, 2010 | Robert Behre

Posted on 06/10/2010 7:12:20 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot

Conventional political wisdom says Gresham Barrett has too steep of a hill to climb to overtake Nikki Haley for the Republican gubernatorial nomination June 22.

Barring any additional scandal, pundits say, Haley should walk away with the win in the runoff election and earn the right to face Democratic state Sen. Vincent Sheheen in the general election Nov. 2.

But Barrett remained upbeat Wednesday despite unofficial results showing the congressman from Westminster losing to the Lexington state lawmaker by a 2-1 margin in Tuesday's primary.

"I guess up in Oconee, they do call it a butt-whupping," he said. "It was a huge margin, but you know what the neat thing is? That's why you play the second half."

Haley campaign manager Tim Pearson said Wednesday that she will return to the Lowcountry soon to campaign.

"Our three best counties in the state were Charleston, Berkeley and Dorchester," he said. "We're looking forward to the next two weeks."

Barrett said he will tweak his message, but he won't attack Haley.

"This is about my integrity. This is my name on the line," he said. "There's been a lot of talk over the last couple of weeks over things that just don't matter."

(Excerpt) Read more at postandcourier.com ...


TOPICS: South Carolina; Campaign News; Polls; State and Local
KEYWORDS: barrett; haley; palin; ppppolling; runoff; sarahpalin
"Dave Woodard, a Clemson University political scientist, said it's not time to crown Haley the winner yet, "but let's face it, when you've been beaten 2-1 (like Barrett), it's a problem. ... I do think there was something to this sympathy vote."
1 posted on 06/10/2010 7:12:21 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Palmetto Patriot
Probably not relevant to this election but I saw that if one votes in the primary we are required to vote for the same party in the runoff. If we didn't vote in the primary then we can crossover vote for either party in the runoff.
2 posted on 06/10/2010 7:18:22 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto Patriot

If Gresham Barrett had any decency and respect in his egotistical body, he would withdraw from the race against Nikki Haley. The voters of South Carolina will see Barrett for what he is, a loser, and he will have no more electoral oppotunities in the future. Ms. Haley will wipe him out in the run-off. Mr. Barrett, if he is wise and wants a political future will respectfully withdraw, get totally behind Ms. Haley and, most important live to fight another day. Wise up, Mr. Barrett!!!


3 posted on 06/10/2010 7:19:00 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX
If Gresham Barrett had any decency and respect in his egotistical body, he would withdraw from the race against Nikki Haley. The voters of South Carolina will see Barrett for what he is, a loser, and he will have no more electoral oppotunities in the future.

Instead, he'll just do the fashionable thing and go "Independent," a la Crist.

4 posted on 06/10/2010 7:21:17 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto Patriot

Saw Nikki for the first time on Hannity last night - she looks impressive....her command was good. And she acknowledged the Palin Effect.


5 posted on 06/10/2010 7:22:21 AM PDT by Sloane_Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto Patriot

Could you please clarify one thing for me. He’s giving up his Congressional seat, yes...?


6 posted on 06/10/2010 7:27:04 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Instead, he'll just do the fashionable thing and go "Independent," a la Crist.

Not a viable option in SC, where the Republican brand is huge. The fire resulting from the bridges he would burn would rival Sherman's treatment of our state capital at the end of the Civil War.

7 posted on 06/10/2010 7:30:27 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Could you please clarify one thing for me. He’s giving up his Congressional seat, yes...?

Yes. There is a runoff for the GOP nomination for that seat between Richard Cash and Jeff Duncan.

8 posted on 06/10/2010 7:37:08 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto Patriot

Thanks...


9 posted on 06/10/2010 7:38:18 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

You’re Welcome.


10 posted on 06/10/2010 7:39:36 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

Dont forget that over half of the state voted against her in the primary. Maybe Barrett is betting that he can clean up those votes.

If two people make the runoff, then let them race.


11 posted on 06/10/2010 7:45:37 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
Maybe Barrett is betting that he can clean up those votes.

Unlikely.

From the full article:

"A Public Policy Polling survey over the weekend found that most McMaster and Bauer supporters will break toward Barrett, but not by a large enough margin to give him the lead, director Tom Jensen said."

12 posted on 06/10/2010 7:57:28 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto Patriot; JLAGRAYFOX
>> most McMaster and Bauer supporters will break toward Barrett, but not by a large enough margin to give him the lead <<

Understatement of the year?

Haley got 48.9% of the vote. So she only needs a tad more than two per cent of the combined McMaster/Bauer vote to pull off a win.

If Oconee's good ole boy Barrett stays in the race, he must be smokin' some kinda very strong weed. Or he's spent too much time across the Georgia line, imbibing their famous mountain dew!

13 posted on 06/10/2010 8:21:43 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

Crossover primary voting gave us Queeg.

It’s bad practice.

I’m sure there is some argument for it.


14 posted on 06/10/2010 8:26:04 AM PDT by wardaddy (I am not in favor of practical endorsements in primaries, endorse the conservative please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

Exactly.


15 posted on 06/10/2010 8:29:25 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Crossover primary voting gave us Queeg. It’s bad practice. I’m sure there is some argument for it.

Sure is. Plenty of mischief possible.

16 posted on 06/10/2010 8:34:13 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto Patriot
I'm hoping Palin makes a one-day whirlwind tour for Nikki (like she did for Saxby) and crushes Barrett like an ant on the sidewalk.
17 posted on 06/10/2010 8:44:00 AM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

You mean a tad more than 1%, don’t you? :)

Even better!


18 posted on 06/10/2010 8:55:23 AM PDT by chesley (Lib arguments are neither factual, logical, rational, nor reasonable. They are, however, creative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chesley

>> You mean a tad more than 1%, don’t you? <<

Nope.

Total votes cast in the race were about 420K, of which she got ca. 205K. The opponents together got about 215K.

If the same voters all turn out on June 22, Haley will need at least 210K votes “plus one” — which means she needs to increase her total by about 5,000 votes.

And 5,000 is approximately two per cent of 215K. In other words, she’ll need to pull in about two per cent of the opposing vote in order to win — which would seem to be a trivially easy task.


19 posted on 06/10/2010 2:08:55 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

Ok. I guess it’s what base you’re calculating your percentage off of. I would have thought total vote was the way to go.

I musta misread your original post.


20 posted on 06/10/2010 4:12:55 PM PDT by chesley (Lib arguments are neither factual, logical, rational, nor reasonable. They are, however, creative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson