Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peterson seen driving to marina 3 times
SFChronicle.com ^ | November 14, 2003 | Henry Lee

Posted on 11/14/2003 5:32:37 AM PST by runningbear

Peterson seen driving to marina 3 times
Amber Frey not expected to testify at Modesto hearing

Peterson seen driving to marina 3 times
Amber Frey not expected to testify at Modesto hearing

Henry K. Lee, Chronicle Staff Writer Friday, November 14, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modesto -- Scott Peterson drove rental cars to the Berkeley Marina three times in the days after his pregnant wife disappeared, gazing at the water before returning home to Modesto, a detective testified Thursday.

Peterson spent only a couple of minutes each time at the marina, where he had told police he went fishing the day his wife, Laci Peterson, disappeared on Christmas Eve, Modesto police Detective Al Brocchini said. Officers who tailed the double-murder suspect saw him driving erratically at one point, as if trying to elude them, the detective said.

Peterson, 31, a former fertilizer salesman, has pleaded not guilty in the slayings of his wife and their unborn son, whose bodies washed ashore in April in Richmond, a few miles north of the marina.

Laci Peterson's body was clad in tan maternity pants and a 12- to 18-inch- long piece of duct tape was "attached to the groin area," Detective Philip Owen testified Thursday.

Also on Thursday, attorney Gloria Allred said her client Amber Frey, a Fresno massage therapist who was romantically involved with Peterson, will not testify at the preliminary hearing to determine whether Peterson is tried.

"I think that if she had been called to testify at this preliminary hearing, that the defense might have chosen to re-victimize her," Allred said.

Peterson visited the marina on Jan. 5, 6 and 9, Brocchini testified Thursday, and "stared out toward the bay" each time. While driving back to Modesto on Jan. 6, Peterson "began doing countersurveillance," making U-turns and stopping on the side of the road, Brocchini said.

But during cross-examination, defense attorney Mark Geragos asked the detective if he was aware that a Modesto newspaper had reported that divers were searching for Laci Peterson in San Francisco Bay on the same days Peterson visited the marina.

Geragos also noted that Peterson's truck had been impounded by police and suggested that his client had been driving in a way to shake off reporters. "You'd rather just come to the conclusion that it's suspicious because he's returning to the scene," Geragos said.

Brocchini also testified that Frey was introduced to Peterson after a friend of Frey's met the defendant at an agricultural conference in Anaheim. After the friend discovered that Peterson was married, she confronted him on Dec. 6. Sounding tearful, he said, "Look, I'm not married. I lost my wife. Let me break it to Amber," according to Brocchini. ..........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Detective: Peterson visited bay several times before body found

Detective: Peterson visited bay several times before body found

By Harriet Ryan
Court TV
Thursday, November 13, 2003 Posted: 9:44 PM EST (0244 GMT)


Scott Peterson

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MODESTO, California (Court TV) -- Two weeks after his pregnant wife went missing, Scott Peterson made three suspicious trips to the bay where her body was ultimately found, a detective testified Thursday morning.

Modesto Police Detective Al Brocchini, the lead investigator in the disappearance of Laci Peterson, said surveillance teams tailed Peterson to the San Francisco Bay January 5, 6 and 9.

On each occasion, Peterson parked at the Berkeley Marina and "stared into the bay" for a few minutes before driving away, the detective told Superior Court Judge Al Girolami.

Peterson never took his own SUV on the trips and on two occasions rented vehicles immediately before setting out for the hour and a half-long drive, the detective testified. He also said that, when Peterson discovered police were following him as he returned from the Bay January 6, he began "driving erratically" in an effort to lose them.

Peterson is accused of killing his wife in their home and then dumping her body in the bay December 24. Her remains and those of the couple's unborn son washed up on the bay shore in April. Peterson insists he was on a fishing trip in the bay when his wife vanished and had nothing to do with her murder.

The description of Peterson's brief and strange bay visits was not the only damaging testimony the detective offered Thursday, his third day on the witness stand at Peterson's preliminary hearing.

The detective also related the account of Shawn Sibley, a business associate of Peterson and the matchmaker for his extramarital relationship with masseuse Amber Frey. Sibley told the detective that, when she met Peterson at an agribusiness conference in October, he told her he was single and begged her to set him up with one of her friends.

Sibley told Brocchini she agreed "as long as Scott was serious."

"Serious about what?" prosecutor Rick Distaso asked.

"A relationship," Brocchini replied.

On December 6, a few weeks after Frey and Peterson began the affair, Sibley learned from a colleague that Peterson was married and confronted him, the detective testified.

According to Sibley's account, he told her he was a widow.

Defense attorney Geragos, left, cross-examines a witness Thursday.

"He said, 'Look, I'm not married. I lost my wife. Let me break it to Amber,'" Brocchini said. Sibley recalled Peterson sounding "extremely upset like he was crying," the detective said.

He later called back and said he had told Frey the truth: that he was a widow, the detective said.

Brocchini also cast doubt on the efforts of Peterson and his family to search for his wife. His parents and siblings established a separate tip line after becoming frustrated with the direction of the police investigation. Peterson, however, promised to turn over tips from the line to investigators. .......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson mistress won't testify at hearing


Amber Frey, right, who acknowledged an affair with Scott Peterson, will not testify at his hearing. By Jerome T. Nakagawa, AP

Posted 11/13/2003 6:33 PM Updated 11/13/2003 11:57 PM

Peterson mistress won't testify at hearing

By John Ritter, USA TODAY

MODESTO, Calif. — Scott Peterson's former mistress won't testify at a hearing to decide whether he will stand trial for the murder of his wife and unborn son.

Massage therapist Amber Frey, who taped her phone conversations with Peterson for police after he became a suspect, had been the most eagerly awaited witness after eight days of testimony. She was on the prosecutors' witness list, but her lawyer, Gloria Allred, said late Thursday that prosecutors told her Frey won't be called.

Prosecutors apparently want to spare her from early cross-examination by Peterson's lawyers. She is certain to testify if Peterson goes to trial next year as expected.

Allred's bombshell came on a day when defense lawyers accused police of a single-minded focus on nailing the former fertilizer salesman for the murders, ignoring other possible explanations for Laci Peterson's Christmas Eve disappearance.

Defense lawyer Kirk McAllister contended that detective Al Brocchini tried to get Peterson fired from his job and told friends he was going "to take Scott Peterson down." Brocchini denied that, insisting that every tip was pursued. "My intent was to catch, not get, whoever got Laci," he said.

When prosecutors detailed how Peterson returned three times to the spot where they say he dumped his wife's body, the defense countered that there were innocent explanations.

Brocchini said police tailed Peterson when he drove from his home here to San Francisco Bay three times in January. Once there, he got out of his car, stared briefly at the water, then left.

Prosecutors believe Peterson killed his pregnant wife and dumped her body in the bay. They'll try to prove that his purchase of a fishing boat two weeks before she vanished is evidence he planned the crime in advance. They're seeking the death penalty.

Prosecutor Rick Distaso sought to show that Peterson returned to where they allege he dumped her body, 85 miles from his home, on Jan. 5, 6 and 9.

But defense lawyer Mark Geragos said that.........

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amber Frey Won't Take Stand At Preliminary Hearing

Amber Frey Won't Take Stand At Preliminary Hearing


Amber Frey

(ABCNEWS.com

) Nov. 13 (AP) — A lawyer for Scott Peterson's former mistress says she will not take the stand during his preliminary hearing.

Attorney Gloria Allred says that prosecutors have decided not to call Fresno massage therapist Amber Frey to testify in the hearing that will determine if Peterson stands trial in the killings of his wife and unborn son.

Allred says prosecutors determined they have presented enough evidence without Frey.

A detective testified that Frey called police about a week after Laci Peterson vanished to say she had been romantically ........

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amber Frey will not take stand in preliminary hearing

Posted on Thu, Nov. 13, 2003

Amber Frey will not take stand in preliminary hearing MODESTO POLICE WERE SUSPICIOUS OF PETERSON FROM THE BEGINNING

By Julia Prodis Sulek
Mercury News

MODESTO - Three times within days of Laci Peterson's disappearance, Scott Peterson drove a rented car 90 miles to the Berkeley Marina -- the place police believe Peterson dumped his pregnant wife's body after killing her -- looked out across the water for a couple of minutes, then drove home without speaking to a soul, a detective testified Thursday.

The testimony from Modesto police Det. Al Brocchini implied that Peterson, not realizing he was being tailed by police, returned to the bay in early January to see if Laci's body had surfaced. But Peterson's defense lawyer said the trips to the marina were innocent -- he was simply a concerned husband checking up on the search effort by divers there. And although he was driving his wife's Land Rover around Modesto, he rented a car because his own truck had been impounded by police.

In other developments Thursday:

• Prosecutors decided they would not call Peterson's mistress, Fresno massage therapist Amber Frey, to the stand during the preliminary hearing, held to determine whether sufficient evidence exists to make Peterson stand trial for the deaths of his wife and unborn son. She could still testify at trial, however.

• Brocchini described how Peterson, a 31-year-old fertilizer salesman, was a married man on the prowl, asking a woman he met at a convention to set him up with one of her friends. That's how he got Frey's phone number and began the affair.

• The detective testified that Peterson had obtained a fishing license dated Dec. 23 and 24, casting doubt on the suspect's statements that he had planned to play golf the day his wife disappeared -- Dec. 24 -- and only changed his mind that morning to go fishing instead.

• Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants -- pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her husband said she was wearing when he left the house Christmas Eve morning. The remains also were wrapped with duct tape around the groin area -- testimony that sent Laci's mother and close friends out of the courtroom near tears.

Police believe Peterson killed his wife sometime late Dec. 23 or early Dec. 24, put her body in his fishing boat, towed it to the Berkeley Marina, and dumped it in the bay early Christmas Eve morning. The bodies washed up separately months later about a mile north of the marina..........

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Family: Peterson Had Several Affairs

Thursday, November 13, 2003

MODESTO, Calif. — Scott Peterson (search) has admitted to family members and friends that he cheated on his wife, Laci Peterson (search), at least four times with different women, Fox News has learned.

One relative, who does not believe Peterson is guilty of murder, described him as a sex addict.

"He has a sexual problem and has a need to sleep with other women," the relative told Fox News.

Scott Peterson's family has contended that his wife was aware of the affairs, and that although she would get angry she'd eventually put them behind her. Peterson's mother has told relatives and friends that she knew her daughter-in-law was aware of at least one affair, and that she once saw the couple arguing over it.

Amber Frey (search), a 28-year-old single mother and massage therapist, came forward as Peterson's lover shortly after his arrest in April for the murders of Laci and their unborn child. She has maintained that she did not know that Peterson was married, and that she knew nothing about the murders.

Peterson has told his family that his relationship with Frey, who is expected to testify in his preliminary hearing, was "strictly a physical relationship."

Laci Peterson's family has said they don't believe she knew about her husband’s indiscretions, Frey included.

Fox News has also learned that Scott Peterson's parents have sold old cars and refinanced their house to help pay the $1 million cost of their son's defense by high-profile attorney Mark Geragos (search).

Testimony continued Tuesday in the preliminary hearing to determine if Peterson, a former fertilizer salesman, will stand trial on two counts of murder.

Peterson has read almost 10,000 pages of the discovery material in the case while he sits behind bars.

He also spends his days doing yoga and making items out of toothpaste and toilet paper in his cell, where he has placed four or five photos of Laci, including one of the young woman sitting in a toy car during her pregnancy, sources told Fox News.

A police officer said Tuesday that he saw a bucket and mops in plain sight in front of the Peterson home as officers began investigating his pregnant wife's disappearance. ......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LACI HUBBY'S MYSTERY MARINA TRIPS

LACI HUBBY'S MYSTERY MARINA TRIPS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 14, 2003 -- MODESTO, Calif. - Double murder suspect Scott Peterson made several suspicious trips to the waterfront where cops believe he dumped the body of his murdered wife, a detective testified yesterday. Modesto Detective Al Brocchini said investigators in January watched Peterson drive at least three times from Modesto to the Berkeley marina where he claims he set out on a solo fishing trip Christmas Eve, the night his pregnant wife, Laci, vanished.

Defense lawyer Mark Geragos admitted Peterson took the trips, but only to see police dive teams looking for Laci's body.

Meanwhile, Peterson's former mistress Amber Frey won't be called to testify at his .......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson Prelim Turns Nasty; Frey Will Not Testify

Peterson Prelim Turns Nasty; Frey Will Not Testify

POSTED: 10:17 AM PST November 13, 2003
UPDATED: 9:35 PM PST November 13, 2003

MODESTO, Calif. -- Scott Peterson's former mistress Amber Frey, rumored to be the centerpiece of the double murder case against the Modesto fertilizer salesman, will not testify at the preliminary hearing.

Frey's lawyer, Gloria Allred, said prosecutors "obviously made a determination" they have presented enough evidence to convince a judge to order Peterson to stand trial for the murder of his wife, Laci, and his unborn son.

Meanwhile, Modesto Police Det. Al Brocchini testified that police received a tip that a man who looked like Scott Peterson was seen driving toward San Francisco Bay before dawn Dec. 24 hauling a boat containing a blanket-swaddled bundle.

Brocchini said he got the tip Jan. 9 and anonymously relayed it in February to a hot line established by Scott Peterson and his family to see if they would pass the clue on to police.

"We weren't sure if he was culling out tips that were on him or on Laci sightings that we didn't know about," Brocchini said. "I was worried a good tip would come in and wouldn't get followed up on."

He said the Petersons never passed the message on to police, who had already investigated the tip. Brocchini said he interviewed the witness, but revealed nothing else about the man.

The testimony came on the eighth day of Peterson's preliminary hearing as prosecutors attempt to show there is enough evidence to have the 31-year-old fertilizer salesman tried on murder charges in the slayings of his wife and unborn son.<.......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Superior Court, Stanislaus County November 13, 2003

Minute Order: Preliminary Hearing

(ie; Ninth day court provided overview)

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-396 next last
To: Sandylapper
Geragos also suggested in his questions that the witness Campos said 9:45. It turned out that the witness Campos never said anything but 10:45--and Geragos knew this.

But we're supposed to take Geragos' verbal meanderings as gospel truth on the matter of who knew what about the life insurance policies? It would be better to consider only the witness' answers--not the lawyers' questions--when looking to get facts from the transcripts.
361 posted on 11/16/2003 10:29:40 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
"Aren't you the least bit interested in why Geragos didn't badger Brocchini about the results of the gunshot residue test?"

Maybe that doesn't fit in with the "cops are all liars and are pulling the wool over our eyes to gratuitously hang this innocent man" theory.
362 posted on 11/16/2003 10:32:29 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: hergus
Thank you for pointing that out. I would also like to see a source for that. B/C the Rochas have been straight-up throughout this. Furthermore, I think the Rochas wanted very badly to believe that this was NOT done by a family member. If anything, they were (at least in the beginning) biased in FAVOR of Scott's innocence.
363 posted on 11/16/2003 10:34:41 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
But where's the rest of it? That quote from the transcript ends with an assertion by Geragos. Did he ever back up that assertion? What Geragos says isn't testimony.
364 posted on 11/16/2003 10:37:34 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: STOCKHRSE
Really Co, it is not my intent to upset a good conviction, but at this point there is no good conviction and Anse has agreed to that off-line. Normally I would not relate that but she/he has gotten very aggressive. I mean, she/he has invited me on-line to kiss his/her ass simply b/c I offered advice...;-0). She did apologize off-line (character shows).

So you are forced to "relate" that I was trying to be fair to the defendant by trying to honestly evaluate the evidence we've seen so far? Gee, I really lived in fear that you would relate that. Not. Are you finding fault with my having found the evidence (some two weeks or more ago) to be thin? So what? Since when am I the person who will be deciding this case? It's an opinion, and yes, I'm trying hard to just go by the actual evidence. Thanks for complimenting me by pointing that out.

When I invited you to kiss my derriere, it was b/c you aimed one of your bitter posts at me, one which said, among other things, "Go back to bed and this time try to get out on the right side...I despise [Nancy Grace]... you will end up just like her..." and then you called Nancy Grace, whom you do not know personally, some sort of nasty name, I don't remember what it was but will be glad to go back and get your post.

Yeah, that was your "advice". And of course it was given with your usual "I know better... you people don't know about these things but I do" air. Okay, Expert--if you say so!

You may want to know that "off-line" is taken to mean off the internet. You know very well that you and I have never met except on the internet. Do me a favor and learn to express yourself more clearly. What you meant to say was that I had made these comments to you in e-mail or freepmail.

I'm getting kind of sick of your gratuitous insults like "GEEZ! me hopes it's she". Where are you getting that stuff?? From your own convoluted mind, "METHINKS".

You came out of nowhere, and joined in the discussion of this case. Many of us viewed you as a harmless and somewhat amusing older man. Then we began to notice that your thought processes left something to be desired. But we continued to treat you with cordiality, b/c you were just one of the gang, one of the Peterson thread posters. Inwardly, though, I began to realize that there are some missing synapses there. I persevered, but when you got all bitter and personal with me, I had had enough.

Now you get obscene with me, and attempt to get personal with me--with someone you only know as words typed on a screen. Your dirty little sexual references are by way of getting you branded as a "dirty old man", STOCKHRSE.

Why are you taking this case so personally? And why are you so insistent on trying to prove to everyone that you know things that the rest of us don't know? It's bunk, bunk coming from a mind that is not all there. JMO.

"Aggressive". Puh-leese. Oh, wait, I get it: everyone who expresses a view that differs from yours is "aggressive", right? Your attacks on a bunch of people in the news, people you've never met, are what is "aggressive". If you don't like my views, don't read 'em. You think I'm "aggressive" just b/c I finally had had enough of your half-baked, inexplicably bitter, accusations, and stopped cutting you slack. Get over it. If you don't like my posts and opinions, don't read 'em. Killing the messenger will not make your "side" win.

365 posted on 11/16/2003 11:46:45 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
"And next time your blood pressure shoots up and you decide to make me the target of your anger, please try to keep it clean, okay?"

Ya mean thusly.....

Posted by Devil_Anse to STOCKHRSE
On News/Activism ^ 10/30/2003 11:05 AM CST #430 of 452 ^

Ray, dawlin', I don't need no advice from someone who can't write a sentence. You are cordially invited to kiss mah derriere, heart!

You remind me of someone who defecates in the middle of the room and then complains to all present about the smell.

You started this and you can stop it at any time!
366 posted on 11/17/2003 12:44:27 AM PST by STOCKHRSE ( The preceding is this Freeper's opinion and is submitted rhetorically. .........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
There is a CA code section that allows police, without a warrant, to seize weapons when responding to any kind of domestic situation where they think the continued presence of a weapon may pose a problem….Anyway, thanks to the many excellent posts, it is all starting to make sense, at least to me.

Jacquelyn told Amber about the mailbox the same day he rented it, on that 23rd, but she was even more suspicious and told him so in no uncertain terms, so he told her he would call her later that day. He murdered Laci as soon as they got back from the hair salon, and he immediately called Amber and gave her his home number and told her she was welcome to call at any time. He even told her he was listed in the Modesto phone book, and the only reason for the private mailbox was because he was gone so often and mail and packages would get lost sitting on his porch, he not having any family and what not.

He challenged her to call anytime, and no one else answering would prove he was telling her the truth. As to the alibi, he had always planned on the golfing alibi, but couldn’t resist the compulsion to return in daylight to make sure the bodies had not surfaced. He may not have even launched the boat that second trip. When he first talked to the neighbors, he was still in the golfing alibi mode. As many lies as he tells, it is hard keeping them all straight.

What he had planned was dropping off the dog some distance from the house, but he never planned for the dog to return home so quickly, as he had doped the dog as well. But dogs apparently have a higher tolerance to GHB and unlike with Laci, he had never experimented with dosing the dog. JMNSHO. (Just my not so…)
367 posted on 11/17/2003 2:25:39 AM PST by at bay (no deals, Jacquelyn, only choice of lobster, steak or chicken for last dinner party of one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: STOCKHRSE
Actually, no, STOCKHRSE, I didn't start it. You started it before I told you to kiss it--and in fact you did it to several people. My post you cited was just where I finally had had enough. And by the way, what I said in the quoted post came from the heart. Feel free to repeat it again and again.

But YOU started it. I am not surprised you got that wrong, since you do sometimes get the facts wrong.

By STOCKHRSE:

(10-30-2003 8:57 AM)

"Go back to bed and get up again, try to start your day happy.

Sure everything was returned just ask the thief. ;)

I guess she took the wedding dress and evening clothes, she just thought ahead. Go out to dinner get married and get pregnant in one neat package. She must have been flying on some dynamite stuff.LOL

The girl was being diddled by Scott Ah think, no one really knows what she took.

Ya know Anse, I think the maternity clothes were sent to the lab to be checked for blood and fluids etc. LE is just trying to obfuscate and aggravate Scott.Think, if you don't send her maternity clothes to the lab, what do you send? I would have sent them to the lab.

Scott probably did set it up but so what, they can only jail one of him. Na, I think SP was late for a rendezvous and she got drunk from the frustration etc.

Oh there will be another judge for the main trial just ask Nancy Grace. Everything she said last night was wrong so who knows, I think she is repulsive and very unhappy. Jmo...

You had better get a grip or that's what's gonna happen to you. Relax, and think instead of reacting to everything, take this hearing in stride.:-)

If the law can't handle him "someone" will, he is a marked man.

Ray"

Well, there you have it. It's a beaut, isn't it? The semi-literate, giving advice to other people. Next time, try to get your facts straight for a change.

368 posted on 11/17/2003 5:22:17 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Pretty good, pretty good! Ties up a lot of details, I must say.

Thank you for telling us about the CA law that allows the cops to simply seize the gun. Considering that they had a distraught husband, woefully missing his dear wife, on their hands, I think it was prudent of Brocchini to grab that gun, and that's probably one of the situations the statute was meant to address. (We won't go into whether CA's gun laws are reasonable, ha ha.)

Gee, imagine that! Brocchini, part of that criminal enterprise known as MPD, actually did something LEGAL??!
369 posted on 11/17/2003 5:33:08 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: hergus
I don't have a source, I'm no cataloger *g*, but I recall reading in the last week or so a quote from Brent saying that he was asked by the cops to suggest that there was a new policy on Laci. I was under the impression that's the article Brochini used in questioning the friend.

My understanding is that cops can say anything during investigations. It's fine if they lie, testing respondants' stories and assertions

Brochini has no obligation to correct newstories, or to give any real info to Scott or anyone else. I think Scott's behavior set off all of Brochini's bells on that first night.

They weren't going to put much energy into any other leads until they pinned down Scott, imo. I don't think they ever moved a step in attempting to clear Scott. We mostly thought he was guilty, based on his own words and behavior in those first months. I think it looks like the cops felt the same way, and then they found evidence to support their suspicions.

Pinz
(Sorry for getting carried away, Hergus, this isn't an attack, just got on a roll there. lol)
370 posted on 11/17/2003 6:55:53 AM PST by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
The sad part of this is that if the bodies hadn't surfaced, Scott probably would have gotten away with this and got the $250,000 besides.

Mother nature did him in.

371 posted on 11/17/2003 7:42:17 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
“Just one thing, tho’, Amber. When you call the machine might say “Hi, you’ve reached the Petersons, we can’t come to the phone right now. That…was….is….so hard to change. It’s a “man called monster” kinda thing.”

(Anyone up for freeping Jackie and Lee for running a phony tip center? If they’re not going to be charged for it, the least that could be done is run’em out of town. They’re all too“comfy on Covena” like Jacquelyn was until the media staked him out 24/7. Another potential freep site: The Red Lion, who terminated the general manager for doing nothing more than telling the husband wife con artist team of Jackie and Lee they were no longer welcome after they accused the Rochas of “burglarizing” their daughter’s home.

372 posted on 11/17/2003 9:03:01 AM PST by at bay (no deals, Jacquelyn, only choice of lobster, steak or chicken for last dinner party of one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Remember that one press conference when Sharon said that she 'heard' Laci repeatedly calling her to keep looking to find her and baby? I believe mothers have incredible strength and power when it comes to protecting their children...

I'm not a religious person, but this does seem like the answer to a mother's prayer, doesn't it?

I think Brochini and the MPD were determined that Scott wasn't going to get away with it, and they weren't going to be distracted by non-credible witnesses and Geragos' side shows. :-)

Pinz
373 posted on 11/17/2003 9:13:59 AM PST by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Here you go, Anse, just a small portion of the testimony which can be found in its entirety on pages 130 and 131 of the transcripts. Sorry, I thought you had read them already!

18 A. Yes. I wanted him to see the article.
19 Q. Yeah. Well, the article -- well, you also
20 encouraged him or his wife to call Sharon Rocha for further
21 information.
22 A. That's right.
23 Q. You further said Scott is not welcome in any of
24 Laci's friends or family's homes right now; right?
25 MR. DISTASO: Objection, Your Honor. Relevance.
26 Beyond the scope of direct.
27 THE COURT: Sustained. I think we're getting out of
28 the direct area, Mr. McAllister.
1106: 1 MR. McALLISTER: Well, this goes to -- I'll cut to the
2 aspect I want to get to, Your Honor.
3 Q. The information about the insurance policy, that
4 was part of The Modesto Bee article that you wanted him to
5 take a look at; right?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. And that was the article that said that Scott had
8 taken out an insurance policy on his wife last summer after
9 she got pregnant; right?
10 MR. DISTASO: Your Honor, I'm renewing the same
11 objection. It's basically been the same questions. The
12 objection was previously sustained.
13 THE COURT: I'm sustaining it again, Mr. McAllister.
14 Move on.
15 MR. McALLISTER: Q. Did you -- the information about
16 the insurance policy that you talked with Mr. Richardson
17 about, that was false, wasn't it, that the insurance had
18 recently been obtained?
19 A. I don't know when -- I don't know. Are you asking
20 me, when I said that to him, did I know it was false?
21 Absolutely not.
22 Q. Well, you learned it was false at some point,
23 didn't you?
24 A. I think he has an insurance policy out on her for
25 250,000.
26 Q. Okay.
27 A. I mean, I think he does.
28 Q. Right. I'm asking you about the "recently
1107: 1 obtained" aspect of it.
374 posted on 11/17/2003 9:40:04 AM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
Thanks, Sandy! Yeah, I've read it, but I definitely don't have a photographic memory, lol.

McALLISTER: Did you--the information about the insurance policy that you talked with Mr. Richardson about, that was false, wasn't it, that the insurance had recently been obtained?

DETECTIVE: I don't know when--I don't know. Are you asking me, when I said that to him, did I know it was false? Absolutely not.

375 posted on 11/17/2003 10:08:48 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Thanks, at bay! I really don't doubt that Brocchini had a right, without a warrant, to seize that gun. What I doubt, since they're arguing about the "seizing" of mops and bucket without a receipt and only verbal permission by Scott, is that Brocchini would have a right to take that gun without telling Scott that he was doing so. I hope that makes sense.

Interesting scenario that you have put forth, but has it been established that Scott and Laci got home at 8:30 p.m. on the 23rd? You know, Laci called Sharon at 8:30 that evening.

Now, that MG has subpoenaed Amber's telephone records, we might, perhaps, get to see if, when and what time on the 23rd that Amber called SP's home phone number.

376 posted on 11/17/2003 10:24:32 AM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
I don't have a photographic memory either, Anse, LOL, as I really thought that Merlin had tracked Laci to the park. Recently, I had to correct a post about that when I went back and reread.

You really need to go read the rest of that testimony. It was just too lengthy to post all of it. There is an admission later by Brocchini that they did receive copies of the policies early on--plenty of time to correct a rumor/lie that was floating around in the local newspaper, if I understood all of it correctly.

377 posted on 11/17/2003 10:36:01 AM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
Perhaps they did get copies of the policies. But these are the same guys who left the videotapes lying on a desk unviewed for 3 months. And the part about the hand swabs for gunpowder residue--I'm still waiting for the other shoe to drop on that one.

Cops make mistakes like everyone else. But I still think that these have done everything they could. They have been pretty thorough.

And if it's all falsehoods or a frame-job by the cops or by whoever, why is it that just about everyone who comes on these threads begins by saying, "I personally think he's guilty"? I am one of those. I do feel sure that he is the one. I want to do more than FEEL that, though. So I trust that the proof will come.
378 posted on 11/17/2003 10:49:26 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper; MEG33; RGSpincich; The Other Harry; Quilla; runningbear; oceanperch; spectre; ...
Judge rules hair IN!!!
379 posted on 11/17/2003 12:05:24 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I heard that..Keep me posted.I have the TV on tracking tornadoes in the Houston,n and s area.It's flooding in areas,of course.
380 posted on 11/17/2003 12:12:30 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-396 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson