R. Emmett Tyrrell's New Book: Madame Hillary
Annotated by Mia T
1.29.04
Madame Hillary
Tyrrell, R. Emmett with Mark Davis
"This is a woman who's been first lady, who's lived in the White House and shared power with a president," says one of Hillary's fellow Senators. "Her ambition is not the Senate leadership. . . . It's obvious she has a much greater goal in mind. Her ambition is the White House, with all the moves to prepare the way." Now, R. Emmett Tyrrell and Mark Davis reveal in Madame Hillary: The Road to the White House that not only is Hillary determined to be President: she has the power, the influence, and the determination to attain that goal.
Tyrrell's American Spectator magazine was one of the Bill Clinton administration's most formidable opponents. For eight solid years it remained a persistent (as well as a devastatingly perceptive and witty) obstacle to the Clintons' attempts to hoodwink the public and whitewash their own corruption. Now Tyrrell, the author of Boy Clinton, has Hillary in his sights again! He reveals that her focus from the first day in the Senate (and long before that as well) has been to capture the presidency - and as a Senator puts it: "She's more disciplined than in the White House, and more poisonously partisan than Bill."
Tyrrell details her plans to capture the presidency -- with help from the liberal media establishment, which continues to treat her adoringly and ignore uncomfortable questions about her record. With an insider's access to Hillary's Senate colleagues and other key players, he examines in detail several strategies she may use to win. He also explains how she distorts the Clinton administration's sorry record in order to position herself for her own run for the Oval Office, forecasts the damage that a President Hillary might inflict upon the nation - and best of all, shows how she can be stopped. A sampling of what you'll discover:
- The Basic Hillary: abundant evidence that this hero of the Left is in fact little more than a controlling personality and a self-promoting dynamo
-
hillary talks:
L'Etat, c'est moi! (Iowa parsed)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
- Why Bill Clinton's decision to run for President in 1992 was the most brilliant choice the Clintons ever made -- and how Hillary plans to duplicate it in 2004 or 2008
- 2004 or 2008? Why, despite intense pressure from some of the Democratic party's heaviest hitters to run in 2004, 2008 looks like Hillary's best chance (although that could change quickly)
- How Hillary did all she could through 2003 to detract, distract, and denigrate her party's presidential hopefuls -- including trying to keep wll-heeled Democrats from supporting other candidates financially, thereby keeping her options open for 2004
-
the clintons' scheme to take over the world in 4 easy steps (caveat empties)
- by Mia T, 12.17.03
-
hillary talks: L'Etat, c'est moi!
(Iowa parsed)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
- Privately encourage/sponsor most -- (I don't think Kucinich, Graham and Sharpton were on the clinton short list) -- of the dwarfs. (Group dynamics, if not political reflex, will ensure a mutual kill.)
- Insert clinton "infrastructure" operatives in dwarf staff positions (strictly as loaners) to ensure (a) that the dwarfs stick to clinton playbook and, equally important, (b) that no dwarf actually wins the presidency.
- Script and direct playbook, which is, basically, bash Bush, bash the war, (look stupid, look weak, look irrational, i.e., be the foil for HILLARY!).
- Continuously loop steps 1-3 even as the missus undermines the dwarfs by playing the hawk... and the military ("the easy part") expert, (Remember Al From!)... and the patriot... and The (Over-The-Hill) Rock Star... while the co-rapist keeps everything on his end (relatively) zipped.
hillary talks: ON MILITARY TACTICS
("The you know Easy Part")
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
To praise Kerry... or to bury him?
- by Mia T, 1.27.04
After spending the best part of a year listening to the Democrats' strolling minstrels strumming their way round the White Mountains, I'm staggered by how little any of them have to say. If you go to a Kerry rally -- something of an oxymoron, but let that pass -- the senator's stump speech is a karaoke tape of floppo populist boilerplate. If he'd downloaded it for free from the internet, that'd be one thing. Instead, he paid a small fortune to hotshot consultant Bob Shrum, who promptly faxed over the same old generic guff he keeps in the freezer: "I (insert name here) will never stop fighting for ordinary people against the powerful interests that stand in your way."
This shtick worked so well for Shrum's previous clients - President Dick Gephardt (1988), President Bob Kerrey (1992), President Al Gore (2000) and President Insert Namehere (2008) that he evidently sees no reason why it shouldn't elect a fifth president this time round. Throw in a few mandatory sneering references to Enron, Halliburton and Attorney-General John Ashcroft plus a handful of local hard-luck stories of doubtful general application -- "47-year-old Arlene Claxton of Hooksett worked 20 years to build up her hairdressing business only to contract a rare skin disease from a conditioner manufactured overseas by corporations George W Bush has given tax breaks to in order to export American jobs abroad to jurisdictions lacking environmental safeguards thanks to a sweetheart deal negotiated by a lobbyist for Halliburton and then learnt that her health insurer wouldn't cover the cost of treatment because etc etc."
Sen John Edwards, the pretty-boy southern lawyer, does a much better job of this sort of thing. I caught him at Gorham Town Hall way up in the mountains on Saturday morning. It was a brutally cold morning -- 40 degrees below freezing -- but the place was packed and we all came away enthused, unlike at a Kerry rally where you come away trying not to think about why you're not enthused. Next to the groggy, haggard Kerry, Edwards has a fabulous, glowing complexion....
Mark Steyn: Knowns, unknowns and the Ketchup Kid
The Telegraph (U.K.) | 01/27/04
erry's problem isn't "haggard.""Haggard" is electable. (See LBJ.) "Cadaveric" is not, at least not outside of Hawaii.
And Kerry's dissonant new "do," like the mortician's careful coif, only enhances the funereal gloom. One has to wonder if Shrum was brought in (dispatched?) to praise Kerry... or to bury him....
- Howard Dean: why his hostility to the Clintons is real, and poses a genuine threat to Hillary
- Coming soon:
- The Dean Paradigm: Dem Roadmap to clinton Extirpation
- The Dean Paradigm: Dem Roadmap to clinton Extirpation
-
- Coming soon:
- The long-term strategy that might compel Hillary to run for Vice President in 2004
-
RAPIST SHOWING LEG:
An Extension of the clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme- by Mia T, 9-19-03
he missus clinton-Wesley Clark spectacle, in any permutation or combination, is as much about delusions of grandeur (with sabotage the fallback position) as about anything else. This is not to say that missus clinton latching onto the general is an aberration. Historically, zipper-hoisted corruption has been the sole missus clinton method of achieving any semblance of upward mobility... or, as Susan Estrich last night so pointedly put it: "hillary clinton is unelectable."
hillary talks:
L'Etat, c'est moi! (Iowa parsed)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)The clinton calculus, that the clintons' utter failure, which unleashed global terror, would be neutralized (or at least mitigated) by any general -- and no less by a general who, himself, exudes critical elements of clinton dysfunction -- is ludicrous on its face and yet another example of that unique brand of clinton rube arrogance rooted in stupidity.
Missus-clinton-flirting-to-run-by-proxy -- the rapist is the one showing leg -- is merely an extension of the original clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme. (With her legs and political skills, the bait and switch is perfectly understandable.)
And the leftist media, like a homely, desperate old maid, is falling for it.
The clintons are betting that media desperation, coupled with her late entry-- and of course, the old clinton standbys, access journalism and plain intimidation -- will militate against any serious vetting of the little missus.
The clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme notwithstanding, it is axiomatic and confirmed on a daily basis by clinton "infrastructure" strategy alone that hillary ("listening tour" / cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes-kind) clinton is no better than Howard Dean at withstanding media scrutiny... and is likely significantly worse.
From this it follows that hillary clinton cannot survive the standard, lengthy, probing presidential-campaign process. An end run is her only option.
And contrary to conventional wisdom, time is not on her side. Not only are the clintons in general decline, not only is she vulnerable in '06, but in this post-9/11 world,
as more clinton failures and betrayals are documented,
hillary talks: ON TERROR
(reinstalling clintons in White House-1 advantage over suicide)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)increasingly favorable demographics will prove insufficient to resuscitate disfavored, dysfunctional, dangerous democrat demagogues like the clintons.
Look, therefore, for the clintons to make their move in '04. Susan Estrich, Al From and The Times aren't on the same "Get the clintons off the stage!" page for no reason.
- How Hillary and her supporters might not run in a single primary, and then engineer a takeover of the Democratic convention in order to win the big prize
-
hillary talks:
"You know."
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
- Skillful ways Hillary has managed the transition from First Lady to Senator -- and even affected a deceptive veneer of bipartisanship and willingness to compromise
- Hillary's charm: says a fellow Senator, "She stares at you across the table, those eyes cold, calculating.
- She holds a grudge. She looks like she has ice water in her veins. . . . Her every action betrays a deep-seated hatred of conservatism"
-
hillary talks:
On Ethnic Slurs
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
Will "dummy" prove more damaging than "bigot" to missus clinton?
Read the letters. HEAR Gandhi "joke."
hillary talks: On Gandhi & Gas Stations
(Why it DOES matter...)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
- Why Hillary's attacks on the Bush administration are not logically planned thrusts in a strategic attack -- and why she prefers not to work off a hard and fast plan against Bush
- How candidate Hillary will try to run to the Right in a presidential campaign, although in a Hillary presidency she will govern from the hard Left
- Saul Alinsky: the astonishing truth about Hillary's radical ideological mentor -- and how, despite her disavowals, she continues to follow his program down to the smallest detail
- Hillary's Iraq War juggling act: how she managed to hold a dizzying variety of contradictory positions -- all in service of keeping her presidential ambitions afloat
-
A Scoundrel's Pythagorean Imperative Mia T, 12.14.03
z = distance between flag lapel pin and chin
d = distance between midpoint of chin and jowl
y = distance between the midpoint of chin and top button
x = distance between top button and flag lapel pin
- by Mia T, December 7, 2003
issus clinton failed to notice: 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. How fitting it is that the clintons were forced to reveal their inept and treasonous hand on this day, exactly 62 years post Pearl Harbor.One has to surmise from hillary clinton's Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic that clinton in-house polling has the missus out-polling Jane Fonda for the Tokyo-Rose prize.
(Incidentally, someone ought to clue in clinton's dresser: exculpation-by-pink-suit can work only once; notwithstanding, a treasonous middle-aged matron in a pink suit reads: "dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit"... or to the sharper subset, "fatuous dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit attempts ingÈnue exculpation ploy." What could they be thinking? Surely, clinton "infrastructure" knows that such a scheme requires freshness of face, not mouth....)
It is common knowledge that missus clinton limits the frequency, intensity and content of her cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind. Tim Russert's (Meet the Press, NBC) stomach-turning HILLARY 2004! boosterism and nonexistent follow-ups ("And why do you suppose there aren't enough troops to fight a war, missus CLINTON?") made it clear that she had the latter two -- intensity and content -- covered today. It was frequency that did her in.
Tokyo Rose also aided and abetted our enemies by using psychological warfare designed to lower the morale of our troops; and she was convicted of treason. One could easily argue that clinton's betrayal, because it is ultimately self-serving, is an even greater iniquity. And then, of course, there are the clintons' other self-serving treasonous acts....
Russert, therefore, was not only on the wrong page. He was in the wrong book.
The question isn't,
"Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?"The question is,--
"Who in his right mind would want the seditious, America-undermining clintons unconfined?"hillary talks: ON MILITARY TACTICS
The Easy Part
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
- The four-step approach that both Bill and Hillary have used to great effect to blunt criticism and silence questions about the many blemishes on the Clinton record
- Living History: subtle and not-so-subtle ways in which her book reveals Hillary's vengeful, paranoid, grudge-holding tendencies
- How Hillary unscrupulously used the death of Daniel Patrick Moynihan to defy Senate tradition and position herself as a major power broker
-
-
- Biography lends to death a new terror.--Oscar Wilde
Hypocrisy abounds in this Age of Clinton, a Postmodern Oz rife with constitutional deconstruction and semantic subversion, a virtual surreality polymarked by presidential alleles peccantly misplaced or, in the case of Jefferson posthumously misappropriated...
-
Mia T, THE OTHER NIXON
Yesterday, Daniel Patrick Moynihan died. Today, the clintons are arrogating his soul. Hardly surprising. In 1999, the clintons were not at all shy about seizing his still-warm senate seat.
One has merely to recall the Jefferson double-helix hoax to understand that posthumous misappropriation is, for the obvious reason, the clintons' preferred method of legacy inflation….
Standard-Issue clintonism
If misappropriation of Jefferson's alleles hinged on a broken line of descent, misappropriation of Moynihan's endorsement depends on a broken line of dissent. Like Sally Hemmings' progeny, Moynihan's later acquiescence is of dubious lineage
-
Mia T, Moynihan Myths
- Bill Clinton's administration: how its lack of accomplishments could actually improve Hillary's chances to become President in her own right
-
hillary talks: ON TERROR
(reinstalling clintons in White House-1 advantage over suicide)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
- Hillary's private life? "I don't think she's had one," says Dick Morris -- evidence that without the narcissistic appeal of the klieg lights and applause, she would have no real identity
- The long-term strategic costs of the Democratic party's involvement with the Clintons: how they have weakened the party that nevertheless continues to fawn over them
-
The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent2
-
hyperlinked images of shame
copyright Mia T 2003- by Mia T, 4.6.03
- If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.
-
Mia T, THE ALIENS
l From is sounding the alarm. "Unless we convince Americans that Democrats are strong on national security," he warns his party, "Democrats will continue to lose elections." Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem.
From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason.
That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will… which means both in real time and historically.
When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.)
Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent.
With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively… and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity.
With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)… and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity.
The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11.
ADDENDUM 12.13.03:
As for pathologic self-interest, check out Richard Miniter's C-SPAN interview; the interview is contained in my latest virtual hillary movie (below), hillary talks:ON TERROR; it is absolutely devastating for the clintons. Miniter lays out in sickening detail the clintons' monumental failure to protect America.
Note in particular Madeleine Albright's shocking reason given at the time of the USS Cole attack why the clinton administration should not respond militarily. It tell us everything we need to know about the clintons. It tell us why clinton redux is an absolutely suicidal notion.
Notwithstanding their cowardice, corruption, perfidy and essential stupidity, the clintons, according to Albright, made their decision not to go after the terrorists primarily to enhance their own legacy and power. The clintons calculated that such inaction would MAXIMIZE THEIR CHANCES TO RECEIVE THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE. No matter that that inaction would also maximize the terrorists' power, maximize America's danger.
-
- Abortion: how Hillary's unbending support for legalized abortion may actually end up hurting her chances to become President -- and her clever attempts to recast her support for abortion as an anti-Big Government position
- President Hillary: how she would be likely to govern -- and what conservatives will have to do in order to survive
There's a great deal at stake in Hillary's quest for the presidency. Says an Arkansas politician: "Hillary is the ideologue, the true-blue leftist." Packed with eye-opening facts and incisive insights, Madame Hillary proves conclusively that a Hillary victory in 2004 or 2008 would be an unmitigated disaster for our nation, doing damage that would take generations to repair. As Tyrrell puts it, "Freedom is the cause. And we need to show that if Madame Hillary loses, freedom wins." Madame Hillary gives you the ammunition you need to do just that.
