Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's WMD Have Been Found
Insight Magazine ^ | 26 April 2004 | Kenneth R. Timmerman

Posted on 04/26/2004 7:32:46 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln

New evidence out of Iraq suggests that the U.S. effort to track down Saddam Hussein's missing weapons of mass destruction (WMD) is having better success than is being reported. Key assertions by the intelligence community that were widely judged in the media and by critics of President George W. Bush as having been false are turning out to have been true after all. But this stunning news has received little attention from the major media, and the president's critics continue to insist that "no weapons" have been found.

In virtually every case - chemical, biological, nuclear and ballistic missiles - the United States has found the weapons and the programs that the Iraqi dictator successfully concealed for 12 years from U.N. weapons inspectors.

The Iraq Survey Group (ISG), whose intelligence analysts are managed by Charles Duelfer, a former State Department official and deputy chief of the U.N.-led arms-inspection teams, has found "hundreds of cases of activities that were prohibited" under U.N. Security Council resolutions, a senior administration official tells Insight. "There is a long list of charges made by the U.S. that have been confirmed, but none of this seems to mean anything because the weapons that were unaccounted for by the United Nations remain unaccounted for."

Both Duelfer and his predecessor, David Kay, reported to Congress that the evidence they had found on the ground in Iraq showed Saddam's regime was in "material violation" of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441, the last of 17 resolutions that promised "serious consequences" if Iraq did not make a complete disclosure of its weapons programs and dismantle them in a verifiable manner. The United States cited Iraq's refusal to comply with these demands as one justification for going to war.

Both Duelfer and Kay found that Iraq had "a clandestine network of laboratories and safe houses with equipment that was suitable to continuing its prohibited chemical- and biological-weapons [BW] programs," the official said. "They found a prison laboratory where we suspect they tested biological weapons on human subjects." They found equipment for "uranium-enrichment centrifuges" whose only plausible use was as part of a clandestine nuclear-weapons program. In all these cases, "Iraqi scientists had been told before the war not to declare their activities to the U.N. inspectors," the official said.

But while the president's critics and the media might plausibly hide behind ambiguity and a lack of sensational-

looking finds for not reporting some discoveries, in the case of Saddam's ballistic-missile programs they have no excuse for their silence. "Where were the missiles? We found them," another senior administration official told Insight.

"Saddam Hussein's prohibited missile programs are as close to a slam dunk as you will ever find for violating United Nations resolutions," the first official said. Both senior administration officials spoke to Insight on condition that neither their name nor their agency be identified, but their accounts of what the United States has found in Iraq coincided in every major area.

When former weapons inspector Kay reported to Congress in January that the United States had found "no stockpiles" of forbidden weapons in Iraq, his conclusions made front-page news. But when he detailed what the ISG had found in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence last October, few took notice. Among Kay's revelations, which officials tell Insight have been amplified in subsequent inspections in recent weeks:



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afterbash; catholiclist; iraq; iraqweapons; kennethrtimmerman; kennethtimmerman; lol; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last
Lando
1 posted on 04/26/2004 7:32:56 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

I firmly believe that if the "Oil for Food" scandal is investigated to its complete conclusion, it will reveal that the UN weapons inspections were also compromised by payoffs.

Lando

2 posted on 04/26/2004 7:36:02 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I firmly believe that if the "Oil for Food" scandal is investigated to its complete conclusion, it will reveal that the UN weapons inspections were also compromised by payoffs.

Lando

3 posted on 04/26/2004 7:36:07 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Bump!
4 posted on 04/26/2004 7:36:50 AM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
I, like the majority of Americans have never doubted that Saddam had WMDs, but Bush needs to come out and give an address about just what has been discovered.

I suspect Bush will be doing this shortly before the Democrat Convention.
5 posted on 04/26/2004 7:38:29 AM PDT by counterpunch (<-CLICK HERE for my CARTOONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
But this stunning news has received little attention from the major media

What a surprise.

6 posted on 04/26/2004 7:39:25 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
BUMP!
7 posted on 04/26/2004 7:40:19 AM PDT by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
But this stunning news has received little attention from the major media

Imagine that?

8 posted on 04/26/2004 7:40:25 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Great News !
9 posted on 04/26/2004 7:40:35 AM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
....it will reveal that the UN weapons inspections were also compromised by payoffs.

You are probably correct.....and the pigs who have
squealed the loudest, are no doubt the ones caught
with their filthy snouts in Saddam's trough.......
namely Scott Ritter and Hans Blix.
10 posted on 04/26/2004 7:41:22 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Nearly a year ago someone I knew in the ISG said that there were smoking guns.

There's a whole lot more going on than any of us know. And that may not be a bad thing.
11 posted on 04/26/2004 7:41:30 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (Coming to you live from HESCO city...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
We need to look in the places we have not looked yet:

Iraqis oh-so-holy mosques. What better palce to hide WMD?
12 posted on 04/26/2004 7:42:21 AM PDT by Iron Matron (Civil Disobedience? It's not just for liberals anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell; Shermy
ping
13 posted on 04/26/2004 7:44:33 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Bump for later reading - looks fascinating.
14 posted on 04/26/2004 7:45:23 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
We did not have to prove Saddam had WMD. He had to prove he didn't.
15 posted on 04/26/2004 7:46:10 AM PDT by petercooper (You'll get nothing and like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Excellent summary, thanks for posting this informative recap. Last week, Timmerman exposed the duplicity of Chiraq and de Villipen when voicing their support for the war in Iraq and then suddenly withdrawing it. (I'm still boycotting all things French.) Now, I'll just sit here and hold my breath until the lamestream covers this.
16 posted on 04/26/2004 7:46:59 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln; Howlin; FairOpinion; backhoe; redlipstick; cyncooper; MEG33; Grampa Dave; ...
Much of this is not news to many of us who have gathered up the snippets of these stories where we could find them. Nevertheless, it leaves me wondering: why the heck isn't the Bush admin out there making this point? Timmerman lays it all out neatly; they could use his outline.
17 posted on 04/26/2004 7:48:15 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Matron
What better palce to hide WMD?

Syria, as was reported on FR at the time they were being moved.

18 posted on 04/26/2004 7:49:12 AM PDT by ASA Vet (It will take a few more major hits here at home before we decide on war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
The so-called main stream press would not report it if the Enola Gay was discovered on the tarmac with a bomb on board, flight plans for NY City on board, with alternate drop sites of Washington, DC or Resume Speed, Arkansas. They would not report it, believe it, or think Bush somehow planned it to help his reelection gig. EVERYTHING FROM NOW ON WILL BE SUSPECT BY THE PRESS. THEY WILL REPORT THAT BUSH HAD THE MILITARY HOLD IT BACK TO HELP HIS REELECTION BID. YOU WAIT AND SEE. IF SOMETHING BIG IS DISCOVERED FROM NOW TO THE ELECTION, THAT IS HOW THEY WILL SPIN IT!
19 posted on 04/26/2004 7:49:46 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Bump to read later
20 posted on 04/26/2004 7:51:12 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Bump for a fascinating read.

Sending this to some liberals who don't want to let the facts get in the way of their opinions.
21 posted on 04/26/2004 7:51:43 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Bump, good article. And I never thought about the "Oil for Food"/WMD connection, but you may very well be right.
22 posted on 04/26/2004 7:52:47 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

That's the thing. The Bush Admin is going along with the "we had bad intel about WMD" line. They have shifted to the "democracy and UN legitimacy" rationale. Wouldnt they be out there making this case if they believed it? What gives?
23 posted on 04/26/2004 7:53:20 AM PDT by Huck (In the Soviet Union, the Admin Moderators ruled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Wasn't there supposed to be some explosive revelation at a hearing on the oil for food program? I haven't heard anything.

As for the article, yes, Iraq had remnants of WMD programs. Yes, Iraq had many many violations of UN resolutions.

But, the lede of the story makes it sound like lots of WMD have been found and the press is not reporting it. That is just not true.

Very few actual cases of WMD are reported in this article, such as: "Reference strains" of a wide variety of biological-weapons agents were found beneath the sink in the home of a prominent Iraqi BW scientist."

BIG WHOOP! So they had something with which they could restart their program with. It doesn't prove they had produced WMD's and had them right before or during our invasion.

Furthermore, this article has a lot of "may" and "might" speculations about what things were used for. Yes, they probably were used for weapons, but may or might is not the same as WE CAN PROVE THEY WERE.

I firmly believe Iraq did have them, that our intelligence was correct.

But, I sure as heck won't allow someone to sex up our findings beyond what they are.

They do not support the conclusion that Iraq had WMD's at the time of our arrival and it is A LIE to say otherwise.

That is our finding....at least as of yet. This probably will change as time goes on once we found out where the weapons are hidden.
24 posted on 04/26/2004 7:53:20 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Curious that the map in the article shows Falluja isn't it? You got to wonder why the fighting, might be the reason.
25 posted on 04/26/2004 7:54:20 AM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
"It seems Iraqi soldiers were obsessed with keeping ammo dumps insect-free..."

"Danish forces found 120-millimeter mortar shells filled with a mysterious liquid that initially tested positive for blister agents. But subsequent tests by the United States disputed that finding. "If it wasn't a chemical agent, what was it?" Hanson asks. "More pesticides? Dish-washing detergent?"

It's obvious to me that the Iraqi military was very neat and clean. Not only did they want themselves flea-free, but the wanted to kill only clean enemies. What's the point of doing something if you don't look great doing it, right?

26 posted on 04/26/2004 7:54:59 AM PDT by rudypoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro; Mr. Mojo
But this stunning news has received little attention from the major media

As usual the right wing controlled media is waiting to spring this information at a time when it will be most damaging to the liberal DemonRATS.

If you believe that, please call 999-555-1212 for the latest prices on ocean front property for sale in Nebraska.

27 posted on 04/26/2004 7:55:11 AM PDT by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
misleading headline......only "reference strains" found.....nothing significant
28 posted on 04/26/2004 7:56:05 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
I suspect Bush will be doing this shortly before the Democrat Convention.

Or perhaps an October Surprise?

29 posted on 04/26/2004 7:57:30 AM PDT by Born Conservative (It really sucks when your 15 minutes of fame comes AFTER you're gone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas; Admin Moderator
Actually, it's the original title on the article--click the link if you don't think so. I thought we were supposed to use the original titles when we post?
30 posted on 04/26/2004 7:59:08 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
.... makes it sound like lots of WMD have been found and the press is not reporting it. That is just not true.

What IS true is that the press and rats moved the goal posts....from WMD, to WMD stockpiles, to LARGE WMD stockpiles. No matter what is found, the leftists in the media and the government will never admit they were wrong.
31 posted on 04/26/2004 8:00:33 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
It's the original headline from the article. LandoLincoln did not change it in any misleading way.
32 posted on 04/26/2004 8:00:49 AM PDT by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Kenneth Timmerman BUMP!

What We Knew…and Didn't Do
Posted by optimistically_conservative
On 04/17/2004 7:14:38 PM EDT with 13 comments

Reader's Digest ^ | April 13, 2004 | Kenneth Timmerman
In 1997-1998, I became aware of clearly observable warnings of hostile terrorist intentions against America, by Osama bin Laden. For over eighteen months -- as part of an investigation for Reader's Digest -- I had been learning from a variety of former U.S. intelligence officers and foreign sources about a vast, world wide network of Islamist radicals, who had emerged from the U.S.-backed war to drive the Soviet Union from Afghanistan. At their head was the shadowy Saudi renegade, Osama bin Laden, whom his followers referred to as the "Prince of Jihad." What made bin Laden unusual was his background....

Kenneth Timmerman: This Man Wants You Dead [1998 article about Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda]
Posted by Tolik
On 04/20/2004 11:17:11 AM EDT with 13 comments

Reader's Digest ^ | July 1998 | Kenneth Timmerman
In July 1998, Reader's Digest published Kenneth Timmerman's report, "This Man Wants You Dead." Three weeks later -- with more than 200 innocent civilians torn to bits by al-Qaeda bombs in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam -- bin Laden's face was plastered in newspapers around the world.  The notice appeared in an Arabic newspaper in London last February. "The ruling to kill Americans and their allies -- civilians and military is a duty for every Muslim. We -- with God's help -- call on every Muslim to kill the Americans." Islamic extremists make outrageous statements every day in the Arabic-language...


33 posted on 04/26/2004 8:01:19 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
bump for later read

34 posted on 04/26/2004 8:01:52 AM PDT by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
" What IS true is that the press and rats moved the goal posts"

And so, apparently, have many Freepers.

35 posted on 04/26/2004 8:02:33 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
The following snippet from the February MTP interview has always intrigued me:

"There is going to be ample time for the American people to assess whether or not I made a — good calls, whether or not I used good judgment, whether or not I made the right decision in removing Saddam Hussein from power, and I look forward to that debate, and I look forward to talking to the American people about why I made the decisions I made."

I think the Oil for Food program, and possibly its relationship to the WMD is the background for this rather bold statement. It sounded then like he knew something that is not generally known (although the Oil for Food scandal was already percollating at the time).
36 posted on 04/26/2004 8:02:47 AM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Caches of "commercial and agricultural" chemicals don't match the expectation of "stockpiles" of chemical weapons. But, in fact, that is precisely what they are. "At a very minimum," Hanson tells Insight, "they were storing the precursors to restart a chemical-warfare program very quickly."

This can be a difficult to use find. Under my kitchen sink are the precursors to chemical agents. There are a lot of duel use chemicals, and unless they are in a useable munitions form they can easily be written off.

At Karbala, U.S. troops stumbled upon 55-gallon drums of pesticides at what appeared to be a very large "agricultural supply" area, Hanson says. Some of the drums were stored in a "camouflaged bunker complex" that was shown to reporters - with unpleasant results. "More than a dozen soldiers, a Knight-Ridder reporter, a CNN cameraman, and two Iraqi POWs came down with symptoms consistent with exposure to a nerve agent,"

Check the contents of a can of Raid.

Until active military munitions are found, tested positive and given wide access to by the reporters, it will still be reported that “No WMD have been found.

37 posted on 04/26/2004 8:03:41 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
I suspect Bush will be doing this shortly before the Democrat Convention.

And - as close to the convention as possible, leaving no time for the spin can be initiated.
38 posted on 04/26/2004 8:05:48 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

39 posted on 04/26/2004 8:07:47 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Because Democrats are liars, they assume Republicans are too...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
See also Blast Destroys Iraq Building, Injures GI (Baghdad area, WMD Search?). Be sure to read the Reuters report a little further down in the thread.
40 posted on 04/26/2004 8:08:30 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas; MizSterious; Lando Lincoln; All
Regarding #s 28 and 30, title is posted unaltered from the source. That's correct procedure, whether or not the title happens to be misleading.
41 posted on 04/26/2004 8:11:31 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Since the RATmedia won't cover this Bush will call a news conference this summer to reveal all that has been found. Then watch the RATS squeek and squeal.
42 posted on 04/26/2004 8:12:01 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic RATmedia agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
The Bush Administration and the "ISG" in their mania to "get it right" and deliver incontrovertible evidence of WMD (both before and after the notorious African yellow cake affair) may have done themselves the ultimate disservice. Saddam acknowledged before the '91 Gulf War that he had "the binary weapon", while one of his generals spoke of using "bug spray" against the Iranians in the Iran-Iraq War. By their very nature, binary chemical weapons are composed of two otherwise inactive, dual-use agents which are only toxic when combined. To discredit the findings of alleged "pesticides" and other associated paraphernalia, to include illegal rockets and chemical artillery and mortar rounds, as the Administration and the ISG have done, has left them in a position of having to reestablish their credibility by proving beyond all doubt that anything they found or may find really is WMD.
43 posted on 04/26/2004 8:14:23 AM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump
44 posted on 04/26/2004 8:16:43 AM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Syria, as was reported on FR at the time they were being moved

Thanks. I heard that as well. Does syria have mosques or holy places? It is like iraq and syria and other mid-east territories to hide things in mosques, then bawl and squall if anyone dares enter the holy realm
45 posted on 04/26/2004 8:17:44 AM PDT by Iron Matron (Civil Disobedience? It's not just for liberals anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
I suspect Bush will be doing this shortly before the Democrat Convention.

I'm hoping for after the dem convention. That way the nation will hear them drone on and on about "the fact that no WMD were found" and then GWB lowers the boom.

Coming out with snippets of what we've found so far is GWB's answer to the inevitable question, "Why didn't we know all this before NOW?!" heh heh heh!

46 posted on 04/26/2004 8:17:46 AM PDT by BigWaveBetty ("Ahnd ahftah muthna hahve olll crompushnin Johhhnn.." "Nithmish nahd caheforea jah Kreee!"~ TKennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: republicandiva
Bump
47 posted on 04/26/2004 8:18:31 AM PDT by LouD (Fallujah Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott; Born Conservative
Yes, the purpose of waiting until right before the DNC Convention would be to completely overshadow the Democrats' coverage by dominating the news cycle with WMD reports.

There is no reason to wait all the way until October for such news, and as we say with Howard Dean's demise after the capture of Saddam, it can take a month or two for a candidate to become completely irrelevant after such a revelation.

I think a main factor weighing on Bush in what should be naturally higher numbers in the polls is the perception that there were no WMDs. The revelation that there in fact were WMDs would not create a temporary "bump" that would need to be timed for right before the election to have an effect, but instead simply unburden the President's naturally high numbers.

October surprises are typically last minute mud, like what happened to Bush with the DUI story. And also, the public is very cynical, and rightly so, of October surprises in general.
48 posted on 04/26/2004 8:18:39 AM PDT by counterpunch (<-CLICK HERE for my CARTOONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
I firmly believe that if the "Oil for Food" scandal is investigated to its complete conclusion, it will reveal that the UN weapons inspections were also compromised by payoffs.

That's a big if, Lando. Right now the UN is in obfuscate mode, and there doesn't seem to be any mechanism to force them to open the books. I hope I'm wrong, but right now my money is on Kofi and his thugs keeping a lid on it.

49 posted on 04/26/2004 8:20:16 AM PDT by Starve The Beast (I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
I suspect Bush will be doing this shortly before the Democrat Convention.

I smell a trap here. I think Bush will allow the Rats to go ape over WMD at the convention - as in none were found. This is one of the lefties favorite topics to bash Bush. Kerry has stayed away from the issue, but he could waffle yet again, thinking it unify the party. Then just after the convention, Bush unloads the WMD news. Let the Rats hang themselves.

50 posted on 04/26/2004 8:20:25 AM PDT by PattonReincarnated (Rebuild the Temple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson