Skip to comments.
After Win, Specter Looks To Fall Election (already distancing himself from Bush)
Associated Press
| April 29, 2004
| Lara Jakes Jordon
Posted on 04/29/2004 6:27:24 AM PDT by Russ
Apr 28, 4:50 PM EDT
After Win, Specter Looks to Fall Election
By LARA JAKES JORDAN Associated Press Writer
PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- After surviving a close scrape in the Republican primary, Sen. Arlen Specter turned his attention to the fall contest and began a campaign Wednesday that could put him at odds with the White House that helped him pull through.
The four-term moderate narrowly defeated conservative Rep. Pat Toomey, 51 percent to 49 percent, in Tuesday's primary after Toomey branded Specter as too liberal. The race was perhaps the most serious challenge yet to any Senate incumbent this season.
Specter will face Democratic Rep. Joe Hoeffel in November.
Less than a day after his primary victory, Specter touted his efforts to trim tax cuts, retain overtime pay for workers, resist school vouchers and continue embryonic stem-cell research - all in opposition to President Bush. The four-term Republican also called the situation in Iraq a "tinderbox" that could be a problem for the president in the fall elections.
"I intend to retain my independent voice, a voice I have always had," Specter said. "The 12 million people of Pennsylvania have not elected me to be a rubber stamp, and I will speak out where I think the necessity calls for it."
Despite his policy differences with the president, Specter said Bush's public support was key to his victory over Toomey. The race was so tight, he said, that the usually stoic Specter could not "stop my nervous system from gyrating a little" while watching vote tallies roll in.
Hoeffel, meanwhile, embarked on a 19-stop tour to raise his low statewide profile. The three-term suburban Philadelphia lawmaker predicted that Specter moved too far to the right in the Republican race to be successful in November.
"This primary has demonstrated that Arlen Specter is not the senator that he used to be," Hoeffel said. "He used to be a moderate maverick, but he is neither of those things. He's voting for a Republican program in Washington that's not working in Pennsylvania. He's their senator now - not ours."
The Democrats blasted Specter as a "political opportunist."
"He has taken every side of every issue for no other reason than to protect his political hide," said Brad Woodhouse, a spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "He owes his political survival to George Bush, and he's now stuck with him and his right-wing policies."
Registered Democratic voters outnumber Republicans in Pennsylvania by nearly 389,000.
Specter has long enjoyed support within liberal-leaning unions and abortion-rights groups, and predicted he would attract Democrats and independents. He said he could help Bush in the fall by pulling moderates to the GOP ticket.
"My agreements with the president are more extensive than my disagreements," Specter said.
Specter spent $10 million to win the primary. As of April 7, he had $4.5 million in his campaign bank account to Hoeffel's $800,000.
That makes Specter tough to beat in November, said Wilkes University political scientist Thomas J. Baldino.
Specter's near-loss "will give Hoeffel some hope," Baldino said. "But as bad a beating as Specter took in term of his reputation, he will continue to raise and spend enough money to demonstrate he can win."
---
.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2004; election; electionussenate; specter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-376 next last
To: stevio
a specter win puts him back in charge of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and destroys our chances of getting any good judges.
41
posted on
04/29/2004 6:50:59 AM PDT
by
gdc61
To: gdc61
so am i supposed to mindlessly follow his wishes like all those that blindly voted for Specter and sold out their conservative values? thanks but no thanks Well you called yourself a Toomey supporter. That would mean that you take his opinion seriously. Toomey has stated that Spector is better than Hoeffel.
Just pointing out that you seem to be a fair weather supporter of Toomey and with your expressed support of Hoeffel giving the cyber finger to Toomey.
42
posted on
04/29/2004 6:52:15 AM PDT
by
Dane
To: Luis Gonzalez
"When elected, do politicians owe their loyalty to their Party, or to their constituents?"
I will turn that around and ask: Do the people who voted for the losing candidate owe their loyaly to the winner just because he is in your Party? If the winning candidate doesn't show loyalty to those who elected him why should those who opposed him all of a sudden become loyal?
43
posted on
04/29/2004 6:53:19 AM PDT
by
Russ
To: twigs
hoeffels politics is unimportant he is nothing. we need spewcter out of the Judiciary Committee so we can get good judges. SEn. Kyl would then be chairman he is very conservative.
44
posted on
04/29/2004 6:53:25 AM PDT
by
gdc61
To: The kings dead
Take a bow, all you keen FR political strategists who told us how supporting Specter would advance conservatism. You don't understand. Promoting 'centrist moderates' over conservatives is really all part of a crafty GOP plot to get the liberals to drop their guard.
Soon they'll spring the trap, suddenly funding promoting candidates who actually believe in the party platform from coast to coast.
Any time now.
45
posted on
04/29/2004 6:53:26 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Russ
I am damn near at a loss for words here. Specter and Joe Farah should be put in a time capsule and buried - NOW. What the hell is wrong in Pennsylvania, anyway? All those years of inhaling coal fumes? Too many happy ass fringe religious groups? Pittsburgh? What! I KNOW what is wrong in Maine - you live long enough on potatoes and fish - and we are talking CENTURIES - things go wrong. The very fact that they stay in Maine now that they know that other parts of the country are available to them is indicative of something very wrong.
46
posted on
04/29/2004 6:53:52 AM PDT
by
vandykelastone
(I'm so glad Goober Pyle is the Governor of New Mexico, aren't you?)
To: Huck
>
He's just playing the game. You think Santorum or GWB are surprised by this? They made a calculated choice. I'd love to hear off the record Santorum's rationale for that choice, out of curiosity.
>
Santorum is in office because Specter, as a loyal Republican, despite disagreeing with Santorum's philosophy, supported him, worked to help him, provided him staff and essentially got Santorum elected over Wofford. There's a good link to the story of the Santorum/Wofford race online. Specter did his job as loyal Republican that year. You have Santorum because Specter made it so. Santorum's rationale was simple. He owed a debt to Specter and if Specter can be a loyal Republican, Santorum is obligated to be the same.
Look at the stats. Pennsylvania has 389,000 more registered Dems than Republicans. How can Specter win if he does not appeal to at least a segment of the Dems?
47
posted on
04/29/2004 6:54:17 AM PDT
by
Owen
To: Dane
your post shows your ignorence to the facts.
48
posted on
04/29/2004 6:54:26 AM PDT
by
gdc61
To: Dane
what would be Toomeys chances at any political position if he did not support specter?
49
posted on
04/29/2004 6:55:32 AM PDT
by
gdc61
To: RetroSexual
"I've rarely voted for a Democrat, and have never given money to one, but I might make a small contribution to the Hoeffel campaign. Specter has to be stopped, and I see little difference between him and a typical Democrat, except that the Dem will not head the Judiciary committee. Thoughts?"
Hoeffel may not head the Judiciary Committee, but if a Republican majority isn't preserved, another Dem will. I just wish they'd remove Specter's committee assignment altogether. Let him waste away.
50
posted on
04/29/2004 6:55:56 AM PDT
by
Terpfen
(Re-elect Bush; kill terrorists now, fix Medicare later.)
To: skeeter
don't hold your breath
51
posted on
04/29/2004 6:56:24 AM PDT
by
gdc61
To: gdc61
your post shows your ignorence to the facts I usually don't point out spelling errors, but could you at least spell ignorance correctly.
52
posted on
04/29/2004 6:56:26 AM PDT
by
Dane
To: Baynative
Like Coke and Pepsi they have divided the market and perfectly fine with working together to keep Dr. Pepper out.
Coke owns Dr. Pepper.
53
posted on
04/29/2004 6:57:13 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: skeeter
>
Soon they'll spring the trap, suddenly funding promoting candidates who actually believe in the party platform from coast to coast.
>
Will the party platform win in Massachussets? Connecticut? Rhode Island? New York? Vermont? Maryland? Illinois? Michigan?
No. It won't. You know it won't. But we have Republicans in office in those states, moderating the influence of the left there. Would you abandon those Republicans and reward their party loyalty by cutting them off?
54
posted on
04/29/2004 6:58:12 AM PDT
by
Owen
To: RetroSexual
If necessary, we can bump Specter from the Chair and put Kyl in his place. If Specter has any questios about Bush's willingness to dump ineffective Senate leadership, he can go ask the junior senator from Mississippi.
As to Hoeffel, please remember that a vote on the floor of the Senate is not a vote in committee. Every Senator's vote counts the same. With Specter, if the votes on Thomas, Scalia, Rehnquist, and Bork are used as guideposts, then there is a 75% probability he will vote for a Bush appointee. If it is Joe Hoeffel, there is a 0% probability.
Don't be a damned fool.
To: gdc61
a vote for Specter is a vote for liberalism and a vote for his DEM challenger is a vote for conservativism. BANK on it.
Absolutely correct. The only way to advance the conservative agenda is with a conservative chair of the Judiciary. If the Republicans retain control of the Senate (likely even without Specter), Kyl gets the chairmanship. A conservative chairman beats one back bench rookie senator any day. I'm still leaning towards writing in Toomey just so there's no misunderstanding my message.
To: Terpfen
barring catastrophe the republicans will only gain seats in the senate. specter was expendable and W., Rick and Dick F*CKED up. or maybe THEY don't want conservative judges.
57
posted on
04/29/2004 6:59:54 AM PDT
by
gdc61
To: Owen
Yeah, most of them would. They would prefer we guarantee Democrats the Senators, Governors, Congressmen, most importantly, electoral votes, from NY, VT, ME, MA, CT, RI, NJ, MD, DE, PA, IL, CA, and WA.
It doesn't matter to them that it leaves the Democratic candidate thisclose from guaranteed victories in Presidential elections.
To: gdc61
Yeah, I'm sure you are the only person on Earth who wants conservative judges. I'm pretty sure that Toomey, by his endorsement of Specter, was signaling that he too is opposed to conservative justices.
To: Dane
LOL thats funny! sorry I am typing so fast i keep missing the shift key as well!
60
posted on
04/29/2004 7:01:24 AM PDT
by
gdc61
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-376 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson