Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS and Dan Rather should be held accountable (Warning: Graphic photos down thread)

Posted on 05/12/2004 9:43:09 AM PDT by jg0510

I posted the following message on the CBS message board yesterday and also sent the same message to Fox News' Bill O'Reilly. If you agree with my message, I would appreciate it if you would forward this e-mail to others in your address book. I believe this is very important and a "grass roots" effort may be the only way to force Dan Rather, CBS, and others to accept the responsibility of their careless and destructive actions:

"I think all American citizens should be outraged at CBS for making the "abuse" pictures public. CBS has done serious damage to the relationship between the US and the Middle East and has endangered our soldiers in Iraq. This is a matter that the Army should have handled internally and privately. 60 Minutes II and Dan Rather should be answering why they choose to jeopardize the security of our soldiers and our relationship with foreign countries for their "big story"."

Since I wrote this yesterday, a US citizen working in Iraq was beheaded in retaliation. If this story had not been made public by CBS, it is doubtful this atrocity would have happened. It is time for CBS be held accountable and should appear before the Senate Armed Services Committee to explain why they have compromised the safety of Americans and our foreign policy.

Thank you for passing this information to other concerned citizens.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: blackwater; blackwaterbridge; cbsnews; danrather; falluja; fallujah; liberalmedia; nickberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last
To: Michael.SF.
Sorry, but the only way to bring CBS down is to stop watching, EVEN IF the game is on...
41 posted on 05/12/2004 10:27:35 AM PDT by vanmorrison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: garyb
I have a lot of disagreements with CBS and their general slant to the news, however, the publication of the photographs appears to me to be a valid journalistic effort.

Then, can you explain to me, or anyone else on this board, why it isn't also a valid journalistic effort to show the jetliners impacting the World Trade Center once a week? Or to show people plummeting to their deaths from the top floors of the WTC once a week? Or even once a month?

Why the expletive deleted do we have to rely on an Islamic Terrorist Internet site to do the job we pay American journalists to do?

Your thinking and comments disgust me.

42 posted on 05/12/2004 10:27:48 AM PDT by HiJinx (Go with Courage, go with Honor, go in God's good Grace. Come home when you're done. We'll be here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: garyb
...the publication of the [Abu Gharab] photographs appears to me to be a valid journalistic effort.

An effort at what? Journalism? IMO thie only reason to release these pictures was political anti-war.

Now why are these same bunch of "journalists" sitting on the photos of 9-11 dead as well as the lastest muslim beheading atrocity?

43 posted on 05/12/2004 10:27:52 AM PDT by aught-6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jg0510
I agree with you that CBS and the rest of the headline grabbing media is to blame for a breakdown in our good deeds (not that they ever aired any good deeds), but the monsters had intentions of killing Nick from the beginning. The media just gave the monsters their excuse.
44 posted on 05/12/2004 10:32:49 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
I just called CBS and asked the gentleman! who answered the phone if Dan Rather was going to resign. He said "for what" I said "for the murder of Nick Berg" He said Dan Rather will not resign and the reason Nick Berg was killed was because of the the people "in the photos". I asked him if he meant our soldiers and he said yes. We need to do something now about Dan Rather. Anyone know how we can start a petition to oust him?
45 posted on 05/12/2004 10:42:01 AM PDT by lindasobers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jg0510
"Dan Rather, I'd like to introduce you to Nick Berg's father;
Mr. Berg, THIS POS is Dan Rather."
46 posted on 05/12/2004 10:43:21 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lindasobers
that was pissa!

give us the number
47 posted on 05/12/2004 10:44:15 AM PDT by hapy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: aught-6
CBS and the others should not be sitting on the photos of Nick Berg either.

48 posted on 05/12/2004 10:46:22 AM PDT by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"THIS LATEST BEHEADING WAS DIRECTLY DUE TO SCHEMING DAN RATHER AND PROTERRORIST CBS."

There are stories claiming that the photos were released to CBS because it appeared that a few enlisted were going to be scapegoated for more widespread practices. I don’t know what’s true yet.

I expected torture from our interrogators. As a USMC enlisted intelligence analyst in the 80s, I shared a building with our interrogative translators. We generally thought many of them were borderline sociopaths. Some were reduced in rank while I was there for burring Marines up to their neck on the beach in front of incoming tide. That was just against Marines, just in an exercise. I had no doubt that terrorist and insurgents were being tortured.

I don’t like scapegoating. I think it’s indicative of the worst form of cowardliness, dishonor and betrayal in leadership. I was once a target of scapegoating when my Captain thought he lost a Top Secret document. (It was later found.)

I don’t know how high this needs to go, but I strongly suspect that it goes to the top.

I think Rumsfeld’s “acceptance of responsibility” was no more a real acceptance of responsibility than that of Janet Reno after Waco. All it did was signal that no more General officers were going to be prosecuted. They know too much. He just gave them assurance that they wouldn’t be the ones scapegoated.

If Rumsfeld really accepted responsibility, it would include some statement like “I authorized them to…”, “I suggested that…” or at least, “I allowed…”. What he said was political BS.

I don’t like how this war is being half fought, like Vietnam – leashing Marines from finishing their job. This is just the latest example.

I would have preferred that someone stand up and say, “Yes, the behavior in these photos is a result of my actions or my mistakes. I’m working to limit it. Now either fire me or get out of my way!” But that’s a ridiculous fantasy.

I don’t blame CBS. I don’t blame the Administration. And I don’t blame some lowly private working in a zoo. I blame us, as a nation for being too fat and soft to prosecute this war correctly. I blame us for not assuming the strength to make a rational moral judgment of good and evil and honestly pursue a strategy for eliminating the evil. I blame us for the hypocrisy on the right, and the opportunism on the left.

Despite the depth and ubiquity of what I believe is the problem, I don’t believe our victory is hopeless. We just have to exercise the courage that is within us to recognize the evil of compromise, and strive to identify and eliminate it everywhere. Identify it in the left when they align themselves with anti-war anti-capitalists in order to win an election, compromising our victory. Identify it in the right when they judge our behavior by our enemy’s standards where it’s convenient. We have to have the courage to accuse our enemies in the harshest terms and to stand up to our friends’ cowardliness when they say we are “eating our own”.

If we’re going to condone limited torture of limited people, define it and stand behind the policy. If we’re going to fight this war, defeat the enemy with whatever it takes before rebuilding the country. I believe America will support it. I have hope in that.

49 posted on 05/12/2004 10:48:58 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hapy
Contact CBS:

212-975-3691
50 posted on 05/12/2004 10:51:11 AM PDT by lindasobers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
I raised Hell at evening@cbs.com
51 posted on 05/12/2004 10:54:48 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: lindasobers
Just called CBS for the third time in two days. I am livid at the response you got. How can any American blame those photos? Who was to blame for Daniel Pearl or those poor souls that were mutilated by Iraqis and hung from a bridge.

Berg was taken weeks ago. What does anyone think they planned on doing to the man.

CBS must be boycotted. Sponsors must be boycotted.
52 posted on 05/12/2004 10:56:00 AM PDT by Republican Red ("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: garyb
Supposedly the photographs have been in government hands since October/November. IMHO, the military was trying to cover this thing up. It certainly goes higher up that the grunts that have been charged so far. I smell CIA and/or DIA. Er, "contractors"

Then you've heard wrong and you really ought to educate yourself a little more before you embarrass yourself further on this board.

The photos were turned over on January 14th, the investigations started the next day. A very meticulous case had been put together by the military and by March a two foot tall report, complete with all the evidence necessary to prosecute the perpetrators was in hand. The photos were a part of that evidence. In the meantime, the officers up to the BG had been relieved of duty, a new group of officers had been installed, a training group had been sent in, and the prison was returned to a state of discipline. In addition, the investigation on the MI/MP was almost complete and should be out in a matter of weeks. This is lightening speed for the military. Consider what is happening in the court cases of Petersen and Bryant if you don't believe that.

Like I said, you need to educate yourself before you go defending the indefensable.

53 posted on 05/12/2004 10:56:25 AM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
We need a thread dedicated to a collage of the real atrocities of the islamic terrorist, a place to send people as a reminder.

I have spoken friends and family and they have never seen any images of Dan Pearl or WTC jumpers.

While CBS throws the abuse photos in our face the real atrocities are never shown as they might "upset" people.
54 posted on 05/12/2004 11:08:08 AM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle
The sad part is I'll be criticized for this, but the truth is a war of total annihilation is what is needed. No prisoners, no quarter, no truce.
55 posted on 05/12/2004 11:11:38 AM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
ping for reference and later comment.
56 posted on 05/12/2004 11:11:41 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Modern "progressive" liberalism is just NAZIism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Like I said, you need to educate yourself before you go defending the indefensable.

I generally agree with what you said. However the liberal media weenie may be thinking of the reports that made it to Sanchez in October/November of abuse and brutality that made by the Red Cross and others. There were two investigations prior to January including one by the Judge Advocate General of the US. I dont believe the chain of command was aware of the pictures until January.

57 posted on 05/12/2004 11:19:08 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: pankot
I'm beginning to come over to your side on this one.
58 posted on 05/12/2004 11:19:54 AM PDT by highlandbreeze (....that others may live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jg0510
Why should Rather be held accountable? Do you really believe that that Al Qaeda freak in Iraq needed the provocation of prisoner abuse to decide to behead a Jewish American captured in Iraq? I think the same thing would have happened regardless of whether anything had ever gotten out about prisoner abuse.

Seems to me just like a convenient excuse to attack CBS, not that they dont deserve it.

59 posted on 05/12/2004 11:22:55 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vanmorrison
Sorry, but the only way to bring CBS down is to stop watching, EVEN IF the game is on...

Can we compromise her, van?

I'll give you regular season, and playoff's, as long as it is not a potentially decisive game. World Series and NBA finals are excluded, as are any USC game. Fair enough?

BTW, love your work. I have 14 of your albums/cd's, plus Brown eyed Girl/Blue Money on a 45. Additionally, two 'Them' albums. My favorite of all is: Wavelength.

60 posted on 05/12/2004 11:27:05 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ('The weakest link in American security is the political link' - Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson