Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking News: California SC rules gay marriage licenses issued in San Fran are invalid

Posted on 08/12/2004 9:58:15 AM PDT by dead

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last
To: dead

Are any of these 'unmixed-marriage types' holed up in a mosque?


41 posted on 08/12/2004 10:05:43 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulane
If Bush win California, free drinks for all freepers on Tulane's dime.

Noted. ;-)

42 posted on 08/12/2004 10:05:46 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tulane
I doubt the US Supreme Court elects to hear it if appealed.

Let us hope so. There are more important issues for the courts to consider.

43 posted on 08/12/2004 10:05:54 AM PDT by elbucko (A Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dead

Sometimes having a Republican governor, even a rino, makes a difference.


44 posted on 08/12/2004 10:06:02 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (Hey, RNC! Get Bob Dylan to sing "Saving Grace" at the Convention!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

YIPPEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


45 posted on 08/12/2004 10:06:02 AM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Does this mean the folks that got married in San Francisco are now living in sin?


The horror!


46 posted on 08/12/2004 10:06:02 AM PDT by socal_parrot (If I can just get off of this LA freeway without getting killed or caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Phone trees throughout SF are no doubt lighting up. There will be protests at the State Building.


47 posted on 08/12/2004 10:06:11 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

I don't see how this ruling helps Bush win CA in November. If anything, it gets our side complacent.


48 posted on 08/12/2004 10:06:16 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
Oh No! What, will Sen. Clinton and Ms. Reno do?

They can still elope in Massachusetts. Ketchup Boy can be best man, and Breck Girl the bridesmaid....

49 posted on 08/12/2004 10:06:20 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("I'm just a gigolo, and everywhere I go, people know I'm lyin' about 'Nam".....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dead

HALLELUJAH!


50 posted on 08/12/2004 10:06:27 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (When it comes to newborns getting stabbed in the head, Kerry cares...about drowning hamsters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Oh no....I suppose the stock I just bought in old Gladiator movies is now going to take a dive!!!

I can hear the Gerbils yelling, "free, we are free, thank God Almighty, we are free at last"!


51 posted on 08/12/2004 10:07:10 AM PDT by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
Rosie O Dounut is deeply saddened.

I guess that means that now she's living in sin.

52 posted on 08/12/2004 10:09:09 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Calif. Court Voids S.F. Same-Sex Marriages
7 minutes ago Add U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo!
DAVID KRAVETS, AP Legal Affairs Writer

SAN FRANCISCO - The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that San Francisco's mayor overstepped his authority by issuing same-sex marriage licenses this spring. The court also voided all the marriages of gay and lesbian couples sanctioned by the city.

The court said the city violated the law when it issued the certificates and performed the marriage ceremonies in a monthlong wedding march that began Feb. 12, since both legislation and a voter-approved measure defined marriage as a union between a man and woman.

The court, however, did not resolve whether the California Constitution would permit a same-sex marriage, ruling instead on the narrow issue of whether local officials could bypass California's judicial and legislative branches.

53 posted on 08/12/2004 10:09:19 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dead

The Massachusetts Supreme scumbags must REALLY feel isolated now that a California Court has said "no" to the activist gay sodomy lobby.


54 posted on 08/12/2004 10:09:34 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulane
If Bush win California, free drinks for all freepers on Tulane's dime.

Careful! I can drink (Diet Pepsi) like a fish!

55 posted on 08/12/2004 10:09:49 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Let's Droll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
They can still elope in Massachusetts.

That's the real battlefield. The Defense of Marriage Act v. Full Faith and Credit Clause.

56 posted on 08/12/2004 10:10:03 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

Oh, think of all the money that was wasted on those beautiful "cock" "tail" receptions following the ceremonies.....


57 posted on 08/12/2004 10:10:16 AM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: EST
the people there already said no.

Yeah, but the right people (meaning the left) didn't say no.

58 posted on 08/12/2004 10:10:30 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead

How weird - a state Supreme Court upholding the law instead of inventing it.


59 posted on 08/12/2004 10:10:35 AM PDT by dirtboy (Forget Berger's socks - has ANYONE searched his skin folds for classified documents?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Fox News just reported that a group of lesbians burst into tears on the steps of the Cally SC when the decision was announced.


60 posted on 08/12/2004 10:10:41 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson