Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/13/2004 1:42:18 PM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: veronica

"The Bush-Cheney campaign does not and has not ever questioned John Kerry's patriotism," Schmitt said.

It is about time that they did.

blessings, Bobo


2 posted on 08/13/2004 1:43:41 PM PDT by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica
Scott O'Grady for Senate!!!

Let's replace that RINO Hutchison with O'Grady

3 posted on 08/13/2004 1:47:27 PM PDT by lormand (I've got your "poll" right here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica; Interesting Times; Nick Danger; Congressman Billybob; section9; Bob J; Howlin; Torie; ...

Looks like people are moving up the timeline.

Note - Kerry's spokesperson is DENYING he was involved in those Paris talks with the VC and North Vietnamese. Kerry's Senate testimony is that he DID meet with them.

I think they just blew it again.

RonDog, this is one for Hugh Hewitt; mhking - get this to some other bloggers. We got another F'n Kerry Fib!


5 posted on 08/13/2004 1:48:41 PM PDT by hchutch (I only eat dolphin-safe veal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica

"Kerry mentioned that he was involved in peace talks in Paris."

Come to think of it, wasn't Kerry responsible for the invention of penicillin, which he did right after he parted the Red Sea? How long before he announces that he was 'Deep Throat'? Somebody's going to have to throw a net over this boy.


8 posted on 08/13/2004 1:54:23 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica
"I see that as treason," said O'Grady, who lives in Texas and has been speaking at veterans events for Bush around the country.

So do I. I can't see any other word for it. Here is a post on treason I made a while back responding to the Teri Schiavo case:

Very well said. This issue is about the right to life and self determination. Freedom to exercise religion has even become a part of it. If you take those three things together you have pretty much covered liberty and the pursuit of happiness too.

All are absolutely fundamental ground level issues of what it is to be a human being. All were principles expressly cited as the core reasons to reject Britain's rule over us and become sovereign unto ourselves. Those were the underlying principles that guided every step in writing our Constitution and constitute its very purpose.

If our government wishes to depart from those principles, if the Constitution is to be read as supporting something other than those principles, if half our country is intent on abandoning and defiling those principles then let them state it clearly. Let them declare what is evident in their posture, that they oppose in every way the principles this nation was founded upon.

If they choose not to do that openly, like honorable men, then let us put it to them clearly that their actions are treason, shall be called treason and will be dealt with as treason.

If our elected representatives (those who claim loyalty to this principled nation) have not the stomach to call treason 'treason' and do what duty demands then we must releive them of office and replace them with those who will.

The issue then today is not 'this right' and 'that right' or 'balance of powers'. It isn't 'rightwing' or 'leftwing' philosophy or 'Republican view' or 'Democrat view'. It's 'American' or 'subversive'. 'Loyalist' or 'enemy'. It is quite simply 'patriot' or 'traitor'.

The right to life is as fundamental as it gets and traitors have undermined our law to deny it. The right to speak and worship freely is as human as it gets and traitors are working to destroy that freedom.

George Felos seeks recognition of 'the right to die'. He's a traitor.
The ACLU seeks to end religious freedom. They are traitors.
The whole Democrat leadership, save a few, seek to undermine our President in a war that they voted to fund. They are traitors!

No quarter nor refuge, public or private, should be given to traitors of our own country. No deference made to the words they speak. No excuses made on their behalf. No tolerance, save our own compassion for the sanctity and dignity of human life, for their presence among us.

If they seek to destroy the principle of respect for life do they not also seek to destroy life? If they seek to remove all visible sign of religious expression do they not also seek to destroy religion? If they seek to destroy the power of the man who directs our military to defend us, because he directs our military to defend us, do they not also seek to help our enemies destroy us?

That's treason.

461 posted on 11/06/2003 12:27 PM EST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope." - Terri Schiavo)


10 posted on 08/13/2004 1:55:20 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica

Now this is some GOOD stuff! Talk about a guy with absolutely impeachable credibility!!


12 posted on 08/13/2004 1:57:15 PM PDT by Mister Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica
On Friday, O'Grady asserted that Kerry had championed the proposals of the communist regime in North Vietnam about setting a date to withdraw U.S. troops - a situation O'Grady called "treasonous."

O'Grady and a lot of veterans feel the same way.

14 posted on 08/13/2004 1:58:25 PM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 (Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica

I shook Scott O'Grady's hand the other day. Nice guy.


15 posted on 08/13/2004 1:58:43 PM PDT by ScottFromSpokane (Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica

"Treason against the United States shall consist solely in levying war against them, or in ADHERING TO THEIR ENEMIES, GIVING THEM AID AND COMFORT"

Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution (My caps.)

By the above, John F Kerry, as WELL AS Bill J. Clinton are foul traitors.


16 posted on 08/13/2004 1:58:54 PM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica

17 posted on 08/13/2004 2:00:21 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (I'm a donor to the Swift Boat Vets fund. Have you donated? If not please do it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica

I have heard Scott O'Grady speak at a convention I attended several years ago. I loved the guy. He was impressive and he is right on about Kerry's treasonous activities.

You go SCOTT!!!!


20 posted on 08/13/2004 2:09:07 PM PDT by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica
O'Grady said he was referring to Kerry's 1971 appearance before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. In response to a question about how he proposed to end the war, Kerry mentioned that he was involved in peace talks in Paris

..........................................................................................................

Earlier this year, Kerry spokesman Michael Meehan told the Boston Globe that Kerry had "no role whatsoever in the Paris peace talks or negotiations."

So either Kerry lied to a Senate committee or his henchman Meehan is lying to the American people via the Boston Globe. But we have known for years that liberal Democrats are for the most part pathological liars, and yet half the American people still believe them and vote for them. Go figure.

24 posted on 08/13/2004 2:12:56 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica

It was treason. Precisely why I get so fed up with freepers saying "He served honorably and he is due that" or some such garbage. Treason cancels out ALL of what came before.


25 posted on 08/13/2004 2:15:28 PM PDT by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica

"I don't think there's anything treasonous about what he did," Bootz said.

He said Kerry had been trying to help find a solution for the Vietnam conflict.

"It wasn't a radical viewpoint," Bootz said.

= = = =
So Bootz isn't denying that Kerry did it then? Hmmmmmm


27 posted on 08/13/2004 2:23:50 PM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica
Earlier this year, Kerry spokesman Michael Meehan told the Boston Globe that Kerry had "no role whatsoever in the Paris peace talks or negotiations." Meehan said Kerry had gone to Paris on a private trip and had one brief meeting with Madam Nguyen Thi Binh and others.

Hey Mikey .. that's not what the FBI files say

33 posted on 08/13/2004 2:39:21 PM PDT by Mo1 (Kerry & Edwards .... they will leave no Special Interest Group behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica
O'Grady is a good Catholic that his Catholic/Christian faith got him through the tough days in Bosnia before his rescue.

This needs to be mentioned and repeated because Kerry has some hacket men and women who compose Catholics for Kerry that directly attacks the Magisterium of the Church.

We need to get the word out about how a good Catholic (Scott O'Grady) opposes a Catholic that is truly a bad Catholic (Senator John Kerry) in the eyes of the Catholic Church.

In the webpage for Catholics for Kerry, they directly attack the Archbishop of Saint Louis -- for political reasons only.

I feel that Catholic Freepers should try to find who are members of Catholics for Kerry and then report them to their local Bishops for their attacks on the Catholic Church.

36 posted on 08/13/2004 2:49:20 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica

God Bless Scott O'Grady......forever and forever, amen.


37 posted on 08/13/2004 2:51:17 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica
He said Kerry had been trying to help find a solution for the Vietnam conflict.

Unfortunately, that was not his place to do that, and by negotiating, he was breaking American law. (Not that such has ever bothered a democrat).

40 posted on 08/13/2004 3:01:40 PM PDT by TN4Liberty (Bill Clinton is proof you to have to be poor to be white trash,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica
A U.S. law prohibits citizens from negotiating with foreign governments on matters such as peace treaties.

Well, isnt that precisely what sKerry was at that point.....a CITIZEN?! He was no longer in the military, he wasn't an elected official yet either IIRC.

Prairie

42 posted on 08/13/2004 3:18:19 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (sKerry is a sKunk!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: veronica
Actually I found one link I'd saved on this Kerry Goes To Paris matter.
FBI Files Show Kerry Met With Communists More Than Once
45 posted on 08/13/2004 3:23:03 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (sKerry is a sKunk!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson