A PRESIDENT KERRY MAY BE ABHORRENT... BUT IS IT EVEN CONSTITUTIONAL?

The U,S, Constitution ^ | 8.21.04 | Mia T

[Mia T]

A PRESIDENT KERRY MAY BE ABHORRENT
...BUT IS IT EVEN CONSTITUTIONAL?

WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

 

 

by Mia T, 8.21.04

"John Kerry gave the enemy for free what I, and many of my comrades in North Vietnam, in the prison camps, took torture to avoid saying. It demoralized us," says former Vietnam POW Paul Galanti, a highly decorated Navy combat pilot.

Galanti flew 97 combat missions over Vietnam before being shot down and held at the notorious Hanoi Hilton for seven years -- including while Kerry testified.

"SELLOUT"
(click to see Swift Boat Veterans for Truth Ad #2)

 

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

The United States Constitution
Amendment 14, Section 3

 

UNFIT #9-JOHN KERRY: DEADLY OPPORTUNIST
SELF-CONFESSED WAR CRIMlNAL MORPHS INTO SELF-PROMOTER WAR HERO

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
NEW! compleatjohnkerry.blogspot.com

NEW! unfitforcommand.blogspot.com

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

 

 

getting kerry's goat
john kerry lacks presidential temperament

"bombastic ass" is not the antidote to "boorish ass"
(or why Keith Olbermann Cannot Do Cleanup for Chris Matthews)

UNFIT #19:
JOHN KERRY'S "MORE SENSITIVE WAR ON TERROR"

THE COMPLEAT JOHN KERRY
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

Kerry, NOT Bush, paralyzed by 9/11 attacks
Hear Kerry admit he could not think

THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES ³
UNFIT #10: 9/10 mindset

THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES ₂
KERRY-DEMOCRAT CONTEMPT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY[annotated]

THE DEMOCRATS-ARE-GONNA-GET-US-KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES₁

dox in sox on lummox in box on fox

THE REAL "REAL DEAL"
(what Kerry's commanders and crewmates REALLY think of him--with transcripts)

Did John Kerry pick a running mate or hire a lawyer when he selected John Edwards?

THE MAN FROM HOPE: been there, done that

"Hope is on the way!" (the scoop)

THE TERRORISTS' USEFUL IDIOTS
all the usual suspects

A Vote for Kerry is a Vote for the Terrorists

ELECTION BOTTOM LINE:
TERRORIST SYMPATHIZER or TERRORIST ANNIHILATOR

JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES: 8/10/04 UPDATE!
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief

JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES:
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief

UNFIT #9-JOHN KERRY: DEADLY OPPORTUNIST
SELF-CONFESSED WAR CRIMlNAL MORPHS INTO SELF-PROMOTER WAR HERO

UNFIT #6: The Deadly Kerry-Hollywood Axis
HOW CAN YOU PUT YOUR CHILDREN'S LIVES IN ITS HANDS?

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#1-making the tough choices in a post-9/11 world
UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#2-understanding the job description

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#3-sang-froid and the "nuclear" button

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#4 - Kerry champions tolerance for terrorists

sanitizing evil
Kerry Cabal Censors Nick Berg Decapitation

"Loose Cannon" Kerry's AWOL/PURPLE-HEART FRAUD

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic

USEFUL IDIOTS

MOORE IS LESS--THE MOVIE

The Cycle of Violence:
NOW WITH HYPERLINKED INSTRUCTION MANUAL

JOHN KERRY'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans

bill clinton, boy "genius," unwittingly bares all on BBC

deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"

vetting missus clinton...

The Parallel Universe of Jamie Gorelick

nepotism + tokenism = a nancy pelosi
(or a hillary clinton)

Kerry's Belated Condemnation Focuses on Process
Kerry Lacks Moral Authority to Condemn Content

"CRY BUSH" + Iraqi-Prisoner "Abuse"
What are the Dems up to?

DON'T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EARS (The Perjurer Returns)
(Clinton: Claims I Turned Down Bin Laden are 'Bull')

The Mary Jo White Memo:
Documentation of clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance

What is the REAL Reason for Gorelick's Wall?

giant sucking sound
KERRY MAKES DUKAKIS LOOK CONSERVATIVE, SMART + JUDICIOUS

Q ERTY6 ^{utter failure}_BUMP

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism

MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

 

 

MORE

[Terpfen]

"The US has sunk to a level that a lying traitor can have a real chance at being elected to the most powerful office in the world, and I am ashamed of the fact that American voters are stupid enough to possibly put him there."

I'm ashamed that you think they're dumb enough to elect him.

[Pippin]

I think after Kerry LOOSES the election, we should all try to get both him and Kennedy OUT of the senate, PRONTO.

[Pippin]

If they do put that traitor in the WH then they are stupid.

[TheBattman]

Remember - we are talking about the same electorate that elected Clinton TWICE....

And regardless of the actual outcome in November, the simple fact that Kerry is polling well (and in most cases, over Bush) would imply that Kerry has a large following of fellow traitors, liars, thieves, and Ketchup Queens. And yes, I know most polls are rather skewed.

The fact of the matter is - Kerry has an serious chance of winning the election - all it would take is Republicans not showing up. If the RATs get their voters out, we could be in trouble.

And I hope and pray that I am wrong. But I stand by my assertion - a large percentage of voters are either too lazy or too hard-headed (and stupid) to listen to the truth.

[Noachian]

...or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

This section of the Constitution is, at the least, grounds for an indictment of Congress' acceptance of Kerry as a Senator, and questions should be raised as to his fitness for the land's highest office.

Of all people, McCain, should see the obvious conflict between Kerry's Senatorship, his present bid for the presidency, and Amendment 14.

But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

It would be interesting to see which elected officials vote to keep Kerry in office should the Congress become involved in Kerry's campaign - though I doubt that will happen.

On the off chance that Kerry does becomes president Conservatives will now have a challenge to his legitimacy for that office much as liberals now challenge Bush's legitimacy. Liberals will then be placed in the position of defending him, and his actions, over the years of his term in office - not a happy prospect for them or Kerry.

Kerry may become president - it's possible - but history will not be kind to him, or those around him, should that happen.

[Pippin]

Another thing about Kerry that scares me is his wanting to get that book "Unfit for Command" by John O'Neal off thier shelves. and his people asking the publishers not to publish it.

Sounds like censership to me.

[EdReform]

BTTT

[Jet Jaguar]

See post 8, It is directed to you.

[MissAmericanPie]

Where is Fox News? Good on you Mia.

[eleni121]

BUMP for a concise and excellent thematic overview of the Flipper!

[Mia T]

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

by Mia T, 5.15.04

 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

 

As long as you've got a rich man on your arm, you don't need a big bag.

--Elizabeth Rickard

 

The $100 billion Iraqi Oil for Food program was by far the largest relief operation in the history of the United Nations. By extension, it's rapidly becoming the U.N.'s largest-ever scandal....

Those included rewarding friends and allies world-wide with oil allocations on very favorable terms, as well as extracting large kickbacks from oil traders and suppliers of humanitarian goods....

There can be little doubt that U.N. mismanagement contributed greatly to the negative perception of the anti-Saddam containment policy. There is also little doubt that the reward and kickback scheme--as well the possibility of exposure--was a factor as some countries weighed whether to back U.S.-led regime change in Iraq. There is even reason to suspect that some of the Saddam friends and allies who benefited may have been members of the U.N. Secretariat.

Oil for Scandal
The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page
Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:01 a.m.

eave it to the French to make pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic all the rage.

They and their moneygrubbing, Oil-for-Food defrauding cohorts abroad, and their power-hungry would-be terrorist sympathizers here, are all sporting "THE LOOK."

(How many of those oh so trendy Kerry-clinton-Kennedy hate-America, blame-America-first sound bites will Al-Jazeera broadcast today?)

The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one, (as they have most things), exactly backward.

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they seek to aid and abet.

THE KERREDY (Kerry + Kennedy) CONSTRUCT:
a lethally anachronistic, post-Vietnam, pre-9/11 liberal conceit

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)



(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

the left's jihad against America is killing our troops,
aiding + abetting the terrorists + imperiling all Americans

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

[musicman]

There was another FR thread in which freeper ApesforEvolution posted a VERY great joke!!

I'll try to come as close as I can to posting it here:


At a very large Catholic church in Boston,the Cardinal is approached by the Kerry campaign moments before the start of Sunday mass, with a "request".

The Kerry representative asks the Cardinal:"Sen.Kerry will be attending your service today, along with a substantial ammount of media people. If you could say from your pulpit durring your sermon that:"John Kerry is a Saint", we will
donate $100,000 to your church."

The Cardinal replies:"I will fulfill your request durring todays mass.", upon which the Kerry rep fulfills his "part"
of the "deal".

The large church is totally packed, with Kerry seated in the
front row pew, eagerly anticipating the Cardinals' "announcement", which will FINALLY put the Catholic "seal of approval" on his otherwise questionable
"faith".

The Cardinal starts his sermon.

"We have a special person in our house of worship today. I would like to welcome Mass Sen.John Kerry. In his 19 years in the Senate, he has voted for and supported "Roe vs. Wade", which ends the lifes of millions of unborn every year, which is completely against what the Church believes.

Sen Kerry also supports "partial birth abortion" which contradicts Church law.

Sen, Kerry has also has backed underage teenage birth control and abortion without parental consent, has STRONGLY come out in support of Gay marriage, which contradicts the teachings of the Church.

He has voted against our troops in Iraq, voted for almost
every tax increase that daily puts more of a strain on our hard working families.


After only 4 1/2 months of what was supposed to be at least a 12 month "tour of duty" in Viet Nam, Sen Kerry, along with Jane Fonda and a few others,has almost single handedly been
given the mantle of credit for creating the anti-war hatred and slandering of the US troops in VN, which resulted in the
treasonable act of supporting our enemy durring a time of war, and to this day, making every soldier who has ever put on a uniform for our great country, and especially those who served so faithfully in VN, feel like a criminal in their own country to this very day because of the lies he told in 1971 in front of a Senate committee, of the DAILY attrocities committed by our brave fighting service men and women.

......But compared to Sen. Ted Kennedy, John Kerry is a Saint !!"

[Mudboy Slim]

"Then why is John Kerry even a senator?"

'Cuz he's from Taxachusetts where voters apparently have no standards whatsoever...MUD

[Mudboy Slim]

"Why wouldn't an effort to expel him from the Senate once he's defeated for President be successful?"

I'd love to see it...how do we initiate the process?!

FReegards...MUD

[The Wizard]

I am amazed to say that this post raises a good point.

[MeekOneGOP]

[Brian Allen]

<< Thanks for calling attention to the 14th Amendment. This is the most important presidential election EVER! >>

That it is.

Until the next.

[Jim Noble]

Then why is John Kerry even a senator?

Because the NVA and VC were never made "enemies of the United States" by a Constitutional process.

[Terpfen]

"Remember - we are talking about the same electorate that elected Clinton TWICE...."

No, we're not. The 2004 electorate is vastly different from the 1992 and 1996 electorate. For one, the Republicans in 2004 have fielded a candidate the public cares about--I maintain that the Democrats did not win in 1992 and 1996, but rather the Republican candidates lost. How else do you explain not just Republicans, but conservatives, taking over the House in 1994? In both 1992 and 1996, Clinton never got over 50% of the popular vote--a further sign of voter apathy towards these candidates. Even the liberal media ran stories in 1996 about how boring the race was. Further reaffirmation of the public's apathy towards Clinton: "My Life" and "Living History" sales never reached what they were projected to, and in fact are being discounted at huge rates, yet still aren't selling. Meanwhile, conservative books are tearing up the charts.

This election is Bush's to lose, and he is not losing. I don't care if the latest ABCBSNBCNNMSNBC poll says otherwise.