|
|
Note to myself: Balance your checkbook. |
Posted on 09/06/2004 3:06:46 PM PDT by Willie Green
For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.
One of the seven great unsolved mysteries of mathematics may have been cracked by a reclusive Russian who is not remotely interested in the £560,000 prize his solution could win him, it emerged today.
The Poincare Conjecture involves the study of shapes, spaces and surfaces and makes predictions about the topology of multi-dimensional objects.
Basically, it says that a three-dimensional sphere can be used in an analogous way to describe higher-dimensional objects that are impossible to visualise.
Since Henri Poincare suggested the theorem in 1904, some of the greatest mathematicians of the 20th century have struggled to prove it either right or wrong.
All have failed. But now the world of maths is buzzing with the news that an answer might at long last have been found.
Dr Grigori Perelman, from the Steklove Institute of Mathematics at the Russian Academy of Sciences in St Petersburg, has published two papers offering a solution to a larger-scale problem called the Geometrization Conjecture.
This is also concerned with geometry, and experts say that contained within it is proof that the Poincare Conjecture works.
If Perelman can satisfy his peers that this is the case, he stands to win a one million dollar cash prize from the Clay Mathematics Institute in the United States.
The Institute is offering million dollar prizes for solutions to each of the mathematical conundrums it calls the Seven Millennium Problems.
But there is a more fundamental problem the general community of mathematicians needs to solve first. Perelman does not seem to be interested.
Dr Keith Devlin, a leading mathematician from Stanford University in California, explained: “He´s very reclusive, and won´t talk to anyone. He´s shown no indication of publishing this as a paper, and he´s shown no interest in the prize whatsoever.
“Has it been proved? We don´t know, but there´s good reason to think it has been. My guess is that in about 12 months people will start to say okay, this is right, but there´s not going to be a golden moment.”
Dr Perelman published his two papers in November, 2002 and March last year.
A third is yet to be published.
By all accounts, Poincare will come out of the first two papers, said Dr Devlin.
If the conjecture was proved it would have profound ramifications, he told the British Association Festival of Science at the University of Exeter.
Scientists working on the frontiers of cosmology and physics frequently dealt with hyperdimensions. A solution to the Poincare Conjecture would greatly increase their understanding of the shape of the universe.
Dr Devlin compared proving Poincare with setting off an avalanche. If you are on top of a mountain, and it is spring, and you jump up and down, a little bit of snow moves. But at the bottom a whole lot of snow comes down.
“It can´t fail to have enormous implications; it will just be huge.”
He said solving mathematical problems such as the Poincare Conjecture was more like writing a story than doing a sum, which was why it took so long.
“It´s just so damn complicated, he said. It really can take two or three years to certify the thing.”
Proving the Poincare Conjecture would be the first great mathematical breakthrough since Andrew Wiles solved Fermats Last Theorem in 1994.
This year, Professor Louis de Branges de Bourcia, from Purdue University in the United States, claimed to have proven another of the Millennium Problems called the Riemann Hypothesis.
The hypothesis is a 150-year-old theory about Prime Numbers – numbers that divide only by one and themselves and are considered the atoms of arithmetic.
De Branges claimed to have confirmed a conjecture made by the German mathematician Bernhard Riemann in 1859 about the way prime numbers were distributed.
But, unlike in the case of Poincare Conjecture, the worlds mathematicians are becoming increasingly convinced that he has got it wrong.
Marcus du Sautoy, Professor of Mathematics at Oxford University, said: “The mathematical community is sceptical whether the methods of Louis de Branges are capable of proving the Riemann Hypothesis.”
If de Branges turned out to be right, it would have a dramatic impact on both global business and national security.
Encrypted codes are based on the randomness of prime numbers. If a system could be found that made them predictable, no secret would be safe.
“What mathematics has been missing is a sort of maths prime spectrometer, like the machine chemists use to tell them what things are made of,” said Prof du Sautoy. “If we had something like that it would bring the world of e-commerce to its knees overnight.”
Or eight, depending on how you do the math. < |:)~
Encrypted codes are based on the randomness of prime numbers. If a system could be found that made them predictable, no secret would be safe.
I had to sprain my brain trying to understand why this article has any importance to anyone besides math eggheads.
And then, there it was.
Didn't someone say that about some new scooter once upon a time?
Yeah but can he figure out the IRS forms?
A disinterested genius....or a slick marketeer.
Publish the damn thing...and let those who want to...have at it.
ping
John Kerry will fund an initiatve to fully explore the Seven great unsolved mysteries of mathematics. The funding will be divided between the seven topics which will be labeld A- H ...
I GOT IT! It equates to sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll!
The smart money is on the first possibility.
Anybody capable of solving this problem is likely to be a little odd and unworldly.
Uh, huh. Was thinking the same. then add to what you wrote, the comment about bringing e-commerce to its knees.
might have some implications vis-a-vis string theory.
if they could get string theory to have anything to do with reality--some enormously profound machines could be built. Instead of it taking 500 years to get to the stars --the time frame would collapse down to about 100 years or so.
This is hugh!
Just give me a sec.
[Lemme see, OK, OK, right, uh huh, carry the six . . . Bingo!]
Yes, he's got it
H.J. Simpson PhD.
Can this guy get my VCR to stop flashing 12:00?
...He has simply posted his results on the Internet and left his peers to work out for themselves whether he is right -- something they are still struggling to do.
"There is good reason to believe that Perelman's approach is correct. But the trouble is, he won't talk to anybody about it and has shown no interest in the money," said Keith Devlin, Professor of Mathematics at Stanford University in California.
That's why he wrote the paper.
It's also why he's not interested in the reward. If he accepts it he has to solve the other six problems in order to pay his taxes.
|
|
Note to myself: Balance your checkbook. |
My nerdy friends are always busy doing something goofy like calculating the "moment of birth" of their next child. Only a watch calibrated to Greenwich is acceptable in the delivery room. My funny, weird friends!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.