Well, I agree to a point, that he shouldn't be using the classroom for this.
I'm sure, however, that if he was promoting gay marriage, abortion, sexual promiscuity, etc. he would still have his job.
Yes, he should be a teacher in a private Christian school. "Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar."
One intollerant parent ruins an entire class.
"What inspires you to love people?"
"If you were to die today, what would you put on your tombstone, and why?"
These are *math* questions???
I can appreciate and respect his convictions, but he did not use wisdom. He was hired to teach math and let his convictions to God and Christ get in the way of that. It is kind of fraudulent of him to agree to get paid to teach math, then spend so much class room time speaking of his faith.
Everybody knows about the religion exception to the First Amendment.
Its better he move on...there are plenty of good Christian schools that he can teach at. And he'll be better for it.
My highschool social studies teacher used to spend 10 minutes or more of class time talking about how Reagan was a murdering butcher and how big business was ruining America...could we call that preaching?
Seriously, this guy went too far. Hope he finds a good Christian school to teach in.
Yep. He is paid to teach, not preach and God can stand up for himself. He didn't win any lost kids by disobeying his authorities in front of them.
He's also teaching the wrong subject at the
wrong level of education. If he has a need
to express his own religious beliefs, he should
be teaching comparative religion/ethics/sociology
in a parochial school or at the college level.
Many Teens are not ready to explore their own
mortality, contemplate an after life, much less
the Overall Purpose of Life.
I agree with his dismissal...he was hired to teach mathematics.
Alas, I also fall into this category, but I renew my efforts to do better daily.
It just illustrates why the whole concept of public schools can't work in a country that practices strict separation of church and state. The church/state debate has become more than just a sideshow in the public schools. It's tearing them apart.
As long as Moslems, Hindus, Scientologists, atheists, etc, ..are allowed the same priviledge.
He will get a better job, making more money.
It is the students that will be the losers.
Which is exactly what the school board and nea want.
We can't have the pesants educated to the level of us nobles.
Besides if they were educated instead of being indoctineated, they would not believe the communistic bullshit we feed them.
Can't have that.
My children all graduated before this baloney had gotten started.
If I had a child today, I gurantee you that they would never set foot inside a government school as a student.
Amen Cassie, Amen!
Is this a case where a teacher initiated a religious lecture independently or is this a case where he was asked by a student about his religious beliefs?
The former I agree is out of line, but where does it say in the First Amendment that a teacher cannot honestly answer questions about his faith?
The First Amendment PROTECTS the right of government employees to religious expression, so how has this been twisted around to mean that hey cannot express their religion instead?
The First Amendment says : "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
Further history shows:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/06.html
Madison's version of the speech and press clauses, introduced in the House of Representatives on June 8, 1789, provided: ''The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.''1 The special committee rewrote the language to some extent, adding other provisions from Madison's draft, to make it read: ''The freedom of speech and of the press, and the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to apply to the Government for redress of grievances, shall not be infringed.''2 In this form it went to the Senate, which rewrote it to read: ''That Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.''3 Subsequently, the religion clauses and these clauses were combined by the Senate.4 The final language was agreed upon in conference.
This teacher is having his freedom of speech curtailed if he is simply responding to student query concerning it.
Why have Christians adopted the same fraudulent perspective of their enemies?
Sounds like he's a great guy . . . who should have been fired.