Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satan Worshipper, Witch Testing Religious Liberty
New York Sun ^ | 12/24/2004 | LUIZA Ch. SAVAGE

Posted on 12/28/2004 8:13:52 AM PST by bedolido

WASHINGTON - A religious liberties lawsuit brought by a Satan worshipper, a Wiccan witch, a white supremacist, and an adherent of an ancient Viking religion is drawing the impassioned support of major national religious groups as it approaches a hearing before the Supreme Court.

The case is potentially the most important religious liberties case on this year's docket, impacting how far a state can go to accommodate the religious practices of its citizens and whether Congress can require states to be more accommodating.

The case was filed by a group of Ohio inmates - Jon Cutter, J. Lee Hampton, John Gerhardt, John Miller, and Daryl Blankenship - who are demanding access to religious books, medallions, and costumes, as well as the right to worship in groups while in custody.

Ohio prison officials have dismissed their religious claims as a cover for gang activities, noting as an example that one of the plaintiffs belongs to a church that has been linked to the Ku Klux Klan. Their lawyer countered that they are sincere: Mr. Blankenship, who practices a polytheistic Nordic religion called Asatru, fasted for weeks in protest of prison rules and was hospitalized.

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: liberty; religious; religiousliberty; satan; satanism; testing; wiccans; witch; worshipper; wrongforum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Antonello
I did that. And, when I say the Pledge I say "under Gods," instead of just "under God". And?

However, these idiots are in jail. They have lost their rights to Freedom for their crimes. Not sure having a bunch of neo-pagans, Odinic Rite, and Satanists running around our prison system with ritual blades would be such a hot, sparkling idea.

They can still practice their faith without them.

21 posted on 12/28/2004 8:39:05 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Can't we leave the Clintons alone???
22 posted on 12/28/2004 8:39:48 AM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

You're so far off the map, I can't even figure out your Loki.


23 posted on 12/28/2004 8:40:53 AM PST by 50sDad ( ST3d - Star Trek Tri-D Chess! http://my.oh.voyager.net/~abartmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

This make me want to scream until I'm Norse.


24 posted on 12/28/2004 8:42:05 AM PST by 50sDad ( ST3d - Star Trek Tri-D Chess! http://my.oh.voyager.net/~abartmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative
I work in the prison system.

Asartu as it is practiced today is generally associated with neo-nazi prison gangs. The mythology (whether true or not) among these gangs is that Adolph Hitler was a follower of asartu.

25 posted on 12/28/2004 8:43:59 AM PST by kjvail (Judica me Deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad
LOL... Ever here the Viking Christmas Carol?

'Twas the night before Christmas and all through the Hall
Not a creature was stirring, not warrior nor thrall.
And I in my armor, my greaves and my helm
Was drunker than anyone else in the Realm.

I staggered upstairs and fell into bed
While four quarts of mead were ablaze in my head.
Then up from below came the sounds of a brawl
So I grabbed up my axe and ran down to the Hall.

I missed the last step and crashed down in a heap
Thinking, "Why can't those low-lifes downstairs go to sleep!"
When what to my wondering eyes should appear
But two brawny strangers, wielding mallet and spear.

I said to myself, "We'll soon have them beat!"
Then I noticed ten warriors laid out at their feet.
I gave out a yell and leapt into the fray...
I'll always regret my poor choice of that day.

For the one laid his hammer to the side of my nose
And up, up, up to the rafters I rose.
Then came a lone frightened voice from the floor,
"Those are no mortal warriors -- that's Odin and Thor!"

Then they looked at each other and they said, "Battle's done.
Now they know who we are, it no longer is fun."
Then Thor raised his hammer, and his elbow he bent,
And with a loud crash, through the ceiling they went.

I crawled through the Hall and flung open the door,
Not really sure that I'd seen them before.
The snow bathed in starlight, the moon like a glede,
I saw them ride off on an eight-legged steed.

And I heard them exclaim,
'ere they flew out of sight,
"TO H*LL WITH CHRISTMAS,
WE JUST LOVE A GOOD FIGHT!"

26 posted on 12/28/2004 8:44:28 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
"There are a lot more kosher meal cases and 'Can I get my chaplain?' visiting privileges cases than there are Satanists and witches," Mr. Laycock said.

And look who's getting the attention. This is troubling and the (dangerous) fringe gets so much attention. Prisoners could and will choose to adopt historical and obscure "religions" to either hide their gang activities or force the people to spend tax money making specific accommodations for such a small group.

Meanwhile here in Hawaii, a Catholic church could not have a cross because it would be seen from the interstate and be offensive to non-believers. What's wrong with this picture?

27 posted on 12/28/2004 8:45:22 AM PST by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
is drawing the impassioned support of major national religious groups

May the Lord strike us down, our job is to hold to the truth not band together with evil to make sure we're not prosecuted


28 posted on 12/28/2004 8:46:37 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

OK, so let's say the prionsers rights are being violated. So what? We violate their rights by keeping them in a jail cell. Or, to put it more accurately, we assume that they have forefeited their rights because of the crimes that they have comitted. Why not just add their religious freedoms to the rights that they forefeit in jail?


29 posted on 12/28/2004 8:48:09 AM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kurt_D
What surprises me is that the author of the article relates these new-age pagans with the KKK.

Reread the article. The adherent of the church associated with the KKK joined the lawsuit based on the legal issues, and not based on any relations with the others' beliefs. That was his only connection to the other plaintiffs (besides being incarcerated).

30 posted on 12/28/2004 8:49:52 AM PST by berserker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Not sure having a bunch of neo-pagans, Odinic Rite, and Satanists running around our prison system with ritual blades would be such a hot, sparkling idea.

Totally agree

Arming the incarcerated is something which should always be frowned upon.

31 posted on 12/28/2004 8:51:06 AM PST by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

You know, that's a pretty good point.


32 posted on 12/28/2004 8:52:54 AM PST by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: berserker
The adherent of the church associated with the KKK joined the lawsuit based on the legal issues, and not based on any relations with the others' beliefs.
That's a Norse of a different color ...
33 posted on 12/28/2004 8:53:17 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
So do they also forfeit the right to practice Christianity?
34 posted on 12/28/2004 8:55:01 AM PST by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
If the Supremes would rule so that Congress could not tie "strings" to the cash it hands out, then it might be worthwhile, i.e., a state's rights victory:

Ohio - which has until late next month to file its briefs - signaled it may attack one of the most powerful weapons Congress has to enforce federal civil rights laws in the states: attaching conditions to the money it gives to the states.

"It would radically limit the power of Congress to say, 'If you want our money, you have to use it in a way that is appropriate,' " said a lawyer for the plaintiffs, David Goldberger, a professor of law at the Ohio State University College of Law.

Ohio could also attempt to argue that the federal government has no business regulating religious accommodations, on the hotly disputed theory that the framers of the Constitution intended the Establishment Clause to relegate such matters to the states.

If the court accepted that view, which has some adherents among legal scholars and has received sympathy from at least one member of the bench, Justice Thomas, then states would be free to provide as much or as little accommodation to religious practices as they wished.

It seems to me that God often works in ways that people describe as "unintended consequences".

35 posted on 12/28/2004 8:58:55 AM PST by Woodworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
This silly case highlights the misinterpretation of the Constitution by the Supreme Court. If the law had been rightly interpreted and the founding fathers principles preserved, there would be no standing for anyone to sue the government.

Once the government gets involved with deciding what religious symbol can be displayed where or whose "right" to religious expression is whose, the situation just becomes confused and more bizarre. If we would go back to what the 1st Ammend. really says, there would be no problem. The government can "pass no law" regarding religion. Other than that, the government must stay out of religious debate altogether. The people and the states have the right to decide these things.

In effect, the government is passing laws on religion all the time now, forced into it by the separation decision.
36 posted on 12/28/2004 8:59:02 AM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21stCenturyFreeThinker
So do they also forfeit the right to practice Christianity?

I'm not suggesting that the state should be in the business of supressing religion, but there is no reason why the state should have to accomodate every crackpot criminal who claims his weird beliefs are a religion.

37 posted on 12/28/2004 9:02:56 AM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Woodworker

Yes, thanks for pointing that out.


38 posted on 12/28/2004 9:03:49 AM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Consenting adults.


39 posted on 12/28/2004 9:03:55 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Pray for the millions of lives disrupted by tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

You're Loki that post didn't get deleted.


40 posted on 12/28/2004 9:06:31 AM PST by Sensei Ern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson