Posted on 02/15/2005 12:34:17 AM PST by DoctorZIn
Top News Story
Persians Push for Bush
Slater Bakhtavar, Iranian.us:
The BBC world service website recently released the results of their 2004 presidential poll. Of the sixteen linguistic ethnical groups surveyed, Persians were overwhelmingly the most supportive of President Bush. In fact, over fifty two percent of Iranians preferred Republican George W. Bush to challenger John Kerry who'd received a minuscule forty two percent of the vote. Thus, surprisingly, unlike in the United States where the presidential race was relegated to a couple of percentage points, in Iran - President Bush won by a landslide.
Numerous other sources of plausible acclaim have confirmed these results. Renowned intellectuals, as well as award-winning journalists have written pieces on this critical issue. For instance, Pulitzer Prize winner Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times who spent an entire week in the country recently wrote, "Finally, I've found a pro-American country. Everywhere I've gone in Iran, with one exception, people have been exceptionally friendly and fulsome in their praise for the United States, and often for President George W. Bush as well." Thomas Friedman another Pulitzer Prize winner and ardent critic of the war in Iraq wrote "young Iranians are loving anything their government hates, such as Mr. Bush, and hating anything their government loves. Iran . . . is the ultimate red state."
The well-documented emphatically pro-Bush leaning in Iran, which is relatively widespread, has perplexed many western technocrats. Part of the answer may be that Iran is changing at such a rapid rate that the media has had a difficult time reporting and/or understanding the situation inside the country. Also, Friedman may be right that "young Iranians are loving anything their government hates, such as Mr. Bush and hating anything their government loves", but there are even deeper social as well as geopolitical reasons such as the availability of satellite dishes and the internet.
Millions of Iranian homes receive illegal satellite television beamed in by Iranian-American expatriates in California. With a mix of pop music, political discussion and international news these stations have had a profound impact on the cultural, and political situation inside of Iran. The Iranian dictatorship has repeatedly tried to crackdown on these dishes as well as the Internet, but they've been largely unsuccessful. Presently, it is estimated that between five to seven million homes receive satellite television and an estimated three million have Internet access. Hence, to the dissatisfaction of the reigning ayatollahs Iranians do not live in a closed off cave.
Due to the availability of satellite television, millions of Iranians were able to hear President Bush's State of the Union speech. The Persians were once again encouraged by the President's vision when he said "To the Iranian people, I say tonight: As you stand for your own liberty, America Stands with you." thereby reiterating his support to the Iranian freedom fighters inside of the Islamic Republic. Several political analysts have confirmed that this was in direct reference to the pro-democracy movement in Iran. "The President was sending a message to the people of Iran that if they rise up America will stand by their side," said political analyst Charles Krauthammer.
Of course, President Bush's declaration of support to the Iranian youth does not mean military intervention for the purpose of regime change. According to a recent poll by the National Iranian American Council a non-profit civic organization in the United States over ninety percent of Iranian-Americans are against any type of military attack on Iran. In fact, although Iranians are openly pro-American any type of military attack by the United States and/or Israel will turn the nationalist population in Iran immediately anti-American.
The political ideology advocated by the Republican Party for a free, democratic Iran is one of a peaceful transition to democracy. For example, Republican Senator Rick Santorum recently introduced the Iran Freedom and Support Act, legislation that commits America to "actively support a national referendum in Iran with oversight by international observers and monitors to certify the integrity and fairness of the referendum." The act further calls for financial and moral support to pro-democracy groups as a means towards a peaceful transition to regime change. There is no mention of military intervention, nor has there ever been any such mention.
Many questionable organizations have promoted a theory originally initiated by Ayatollah Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani dubbed the "Nationalistic Tactic." This theory rallies nationalistic feelings around a fictional military invasion of Iran as a final survival tool for the dying regime in Iran. The strategy calls for the suffocation of the free exchange of ideas within the Iranian community and for the luring of naive apolitical Iranians with nationalistic pride. In the end, the theory calls for barraging the truth to such a degree that anyone speaking otherwise is regarded as an enemy of Iran.
Unfortunately these groups are far from doing a service to the people of Iran and should not be regarded as friends of freedom. Luckily, in spite of their propaganda campaign polls from within Iran show that people of Iran have not been fooled.
As evidenced by a Tehran University student who said, "The Iranian people support President Bush because he supports our cause. As long President Bush stands with the Iranian people, the Iranian people will stand with him."
Diplomacy and Iran's nuclear weapons - Henry A. Kissinger, San Diego Union Tribune
'New' Rumsfeld is Seeking Stronger Ties with Europe - The New York Times
Senator Urges White House to Join Talks on Iran - The Los Angeles Times
Iran Says 'No' to Europeans - The Associated Press
Bush's Speech Is Clarion Call For A Free Iran - Daily Breeze
The Most Powerful Man in Iraq is An Ayatollah with a Website - The Times UK
Iranian Hardliner Says Iran will Produce Atomic Bomb - IranMania
EU-U.S. Trainwreck Over Iran? - Arnaud De Borchgrave, United Press International
Iran Asked to Give Counsel Choice - BBC News
Woman's Veil May Have Started Deadly Mosque Fire - The Associated Press
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”
bump!
Bump!
Bump
That is a great article!
I am hearing about EU pressure on Mullahs to recognize Israel.
EU told Mullahs if they recognize the state of Israel, they can run their nuke program!
Great article.
I have been on this ping list for a long time and this is the best report yet. Hope is what I feel and contempt for the media that never let on although I suspect this pro Bush majority was known to them during the election!
I'm really starting to get sick and tired of the Europeans. Yes, I knew what to expect, I have a very low opinion of their foreign policy and the ethics of their foreign policy, yet, somehow they are disappointing me again.
It seemed that we had turned a corner with Condi Rice's visits. I guess not.
More infuritatingly, if military ends up being required, the Europeans will blast us again for be unilateralists.
My sympathies for the people killed and injured in the Tehran mosque fire. They did not get to see a free Iran. Hopefully the majority of Iranians will have different fortues. Out of consideration for others, I won't say what I really want to say about the fire.
It seems likely that Iranian funded forces were behind the assassination of the former Lebanese PM. The analysis that it was a signal to the West is believable. It doesn't make any sense for the attack to be an operation completely thought up and done by the Syrians. After all, all it really does for them is hasten regime change It's like Iran did the crime, sped away in the car, and Syria is left with the bloody hands to show the police. To be sure, Syrian elements were involved in the assassination. But the Iranian motive is far stronger than the Syrian motive. The former PM was opposed to the Syrian occupation, and as I understand it, was an influential member of the opposition. Syria has more to lose than to gain with this attack. They may be evil, but they aren't idiots.
"I am hearing about EU pressure on Mullahs to recognize Israel.
EU told Mullahs if they recognize the state of Israel, they can run their nuke program!"
It's convenient for Iran. That way, when Israel takes out Iran's nuclear capabilities, Iran can say, "Israel has attacked us!!" Instead of saying, "It's the Jooooos!!!!!"
The first line would sound better on CNN.
There are some red lines for the Mullahs
1- Great Satan
2- Israel (Little Satan)
3- Supporting Terrorism
.
.
.
etc
If they cross any of these red lines, they really sign their execution permit by their own hand.
They have kept chanting against the US and Israel for the past 26 years and that is their fuel to suppress their own people, so any time they lose on of their pretexts, they also lost their legitimacy to rule.
But I think it is a smart move from EUs to press the Mullahs to cross their red lines. I think the Mullahs' days are really numbered.
Krauthammer is the shrewdest observer of the political scene.
It is heartening to hear of the pro-American and pro-Bush sentiment in Iran.
Iranians may dismiss any talk of "an invasion by America" as the last gambit of desperate despots.
Stricken with a terminal case of Ceasescuoma, Khatami is a dead man talking.
lol
LIZARD on sale...
http://www.iranianmovies.com/description/marmulak.htm
This thread is now closed.
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
