Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zogby Poll: Bush would still beat Kerry today
Zogby ^ | John Zogby

Posted on 04/29/2005 3:30:05 PM PDT by Nascardude

Released: April 26, 2005 Red/Blue Divide Still Evident: Red States Give Bush 50% Job Approval, 42% in Blues; War on Terror Bush’s Strength—Low Marks on Other Facets of Job; Handling of Social Security Nets Lowest Score; Bush Would Still Beat Kerry Today (46% to 41%), New Zogby Poll Reveals

President George W. Bush, despite low marks on most facets of his job, would still beat Democrat John Kerry (46% to 41%)—and would still win handily in the Red States that handed him his re-election victory last fall (50% to 36%). That’s the finding of a new Zogby International survey of 1011 likely voters conducted from April 15 through 19, 2005, with a margin of error of +/-3.1 percentage points. The Zogby America poll also found that President Bush’s initiative to reform social security is unpopular with nearly two-in-three (64%) voters.

Zogby International includes the results of the survey in tabular format, including an analysis of the breakdown by “Red States” and “Blue States,” the designation given the Republican-leaning states that supported the President and the Democrat-leaning states that supported Senator Kerry, respectively, in the last election.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushbeatskerry; bushvictory; gwb2004; kewl; poll; polls; zogby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Nascardude
By the way, why in god's name would Zogby want to waste his time, money, and resources polling an election that happened 6 months ago?

I agree. There are more important contests to which Zogby should devote his time:

Ginger.....or Mary Ann?

21 posted on 04/29/2005 4:03:20 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nascardude
By the way, why in god's name would Zogby want to waste his time, money, and resources polling an election that happened 6 months ago?

Zogby's been way wrong since the 2002 elections, but he really blew it in 2004.

In May, 2004 - before the conventions - his polls predicted that Kerry would win in November. Then at 5:00pm on Nov. 2, 2004 (election day) Zogby made the incredible prediction that Kerry would win with 311 electoral votes. He claimed to have based that prediction on 958 phone calls to probable voters across the U.S.

You see, Zogby busted his polling reputation wide open predicting a Kerry victory in 2004 and became the joke of the industry. Plus, it doesn't help that he and his brother, James Zogby has some interesting Arab connections.

The answer I think, comes from the fact that Zogby is not a non-partisan actor in all this. His brother, James Zogby is an outreach coordinator for Arab voters for the Democratic Party, and heads an Arab American advocacy group. John Zogby admits to being a Democrat, like his brother. And like his brother, he is also an advocate for the Arab side of the Middle East conflict.

Richard Zogby came out of the 2004 elections as giving worthless polls based on his deep desire to see Bush defeated, and his reputation 'got shot'. He's still trying to gloss it over, even 6 months later.

22 posted on 04/29/2005 4:05:39 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nascardude
By the way, why in god's name would Zogby want to waste his time, money, and resources polling an election that happened 6 months ago?

Dollars to donuts this was funded by an "operative" group to use as tool to leverage against Bush for various issues

I'd also bet if you dig deep into the polls methodology you might find some surprises Polls aren't cheap to conduct, someone is looking for political points to make.

23 posted on 04/29/2005 4:17:00 PM PDT by Popman (The American Left: Goose Stepping into the Future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nascardude

...but it's Friday, so all the weekend polling has rolled off. Kerry always does better in the weekend polling. Wait until Monday, Bush will be behind again.


24 posted on 04/29/2005 4:19:52 PM PDT by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nascardude

But .. Zogby still has SS wrong. It's way off from the FOX polls taken today.


25 posted on 04/29/2005 4:23:53 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

Oh god. With this being an off election year, I sure don't miss hearing that kind of chitter chatter.


26 posted on 04/29/2005 4:24:18 PM PDT by Nascardude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

If you could vote again in the most recent presidential election this past November, would you vote again for George W. Bush, would you vote again for John Kerry, would you vote again for a third party candidate, would you change your vote to George W. Bush, would you change your vote to John Kerry, would you change your vote to a third party candidate, or would you not vote?

 

4-18-05

2-27-05

Overall

Red states

Blue states

Overall

Vote again for Bush

45

49

40

45

Vote again for Kerry

39

34

45

40

Vote again for third party

2

1

3

2

Change vote for Bush

1

1

1

1

Change vote for Kerry

1

2

1

2

Change vote for third party

4

4

4

5

Would not vote

2

2

2

2

Did not vote in November/ could not vote in November

2

2

2

0

Not sure

4

5

3

4


27 posted on 04/29/2005 4:33:31 PM PDT by deport (There are worse things than getting a wrong number call at 4 AM. It could be the correct number..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nascardude
Zogby recently did an internet poll consisting of 400 questions. There were a number of avenues covered. He gets a lot of milage out of a poll, probably having been commissioned by several clients who pool their resources. This report on the election may have come from that poll and is just one facet of the results. I would not be surprised if both political parties participated, that would make sense to me. The business of politics is constant and apparently there can never be too much information about where your potential votes might come from.
28 posted on 04/29/2005 4:36:42 PM PDT by mountainfolk (God bless President George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nascardude
Once in awhile....this just has to be posted...

Who's in the White House

29 posted on 04/29/2005 5:26:36 PM PDT by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight
This is an excellent video! I had a running argument this week with some liberal coworkers over the clip Randi Rhodes aired the other day, advocating the shooting of President Bush over his Social Security proposals. These people thought the whole thing was just "harmless fun".

I'll send them the link to this video first thing Monday morning - it will drive them nuts!

30 posted on 04/30/2005 10:32:33 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson