Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Los Angeles Times Reports March Circulation (Down, down, down)
LAT Release ^

Posted on 05/02/2005 1:19:45 PM PDT by Uncledave

Press Release Source: Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times Reports March Circulation Monday May 2, 3:00 pm ET

LOS ANGELES, May 2 /PRNewswire/ -- For the six months ended March 31, 2005, the Los Angeles Times reported Monday-Saturday average daily circulation of 907,997, a decline of 6.5 percent compared with the prior year, and Sunday circulation of 1,253,849, a decline of 7.9 percent from the prior year, according to figures filed with the Audit Bureau of Circulations, subject to audit.

Excluding the effect of a reduction in third-party bulk sales, daily circulation would have declined 5.2 percent and Sunday would have declined 4.7 percent.

"These circulation declines are driven by the same issues that impacted our September circulation statement," said Jeffrey M. Johnson, Los Angeles Times executive vice president and general manager, who will become president, publisher and CEO on June 1. "These include the transition to more targeted sales channels from a heavy reliance on telemarketing and the decision to deliberately reduce certain types of circulation, such as third-party bulk sales. The reality is that it takes two six-month reporting statements to cycle through these changes.

"The Los Angeles Times continues to deliver the largest audience in Southern California with an average daily readership of 2.4 million and 3.5 million on Sunday, according to Scarborough 2004 Los Angeles Report. To strengthen this market position, we're investing in various strategies and programs to increase readership that should begin to show results in September," added Johnson.

The Times has taken the following actions:

* Launched a comprehensive $10 million consumer marketing campaign, including brand advertising and direct marketing efforts. * Appointed a veteran newspaper circulation executive to a newly created position of senior vice president, circulation to focus entirely on circulation sales and distribution. * Began executing new circulation programs to grow late-week circulation and Sunday readership.

"These investments are good examples of our long-term commitment to growing quality, responsive readership that delivers results to our advertisers," said Johnson.

The Los Angeles Times, a Tribune Publishing company, is the largest metropolitan daily newspaper in the country and the winner of 37 Pulitzer Prizes, including two this year. The Times publishes five daily regional editions, including the Los Angeles metropolitan area, Orange and Ventura counties, the San Fernando Valley, and an Inland Empire edition covering Riverside and San Bernardino counties as well as a National edition. Additional information about The Times is available at www.latimes.com/mediacenter.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lat; latimes; liberalmedia; newspapers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Uncledave

Maybe there's a declining demand for liberal propaganda.


21 posted on 05/02/2005 1:40:43 PM PDT by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

El Tiempos De Los Ángeles


22 posted on 05/02/2005 1:44:32 PM PDT by itsamelman (“Announcing your plans is a good way to hear God laugh.” -- Al Swearengen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
"They should just be happy to do it for the People"

The English speaking people who are leaving? LOL......

23 posted on 05/02/2005 1:44:50 PM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
"the decision to deliberately reduce certain types of circulation, such as third-party bulk sales."

What, they aren't counting sales to recycling plants or pulp mills any more?

24 posted on 05/02/2005 1:45:11 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

And sometimes a fight....


25 posted on 05/02/2005 1:46:51 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: litehaus
Maybe they can come out with a Spanish version. Call it the LA Raza Times!
26 posted on 05/02/2005 1:48:18 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

Yes, and that adds to the entertainment quality as well...


27 posted on 05/02/2005 1:48:44 PM PDT by pissant (select your paddle carefully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Maybe that's why they've started including articles like this on their pages:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1394673/posts


28 posted on 05/02/2005 1:49:46 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels; doug from upland; Southack

"they're losing readership because they are biased and publish fiction. And we're tired of it."

Meanwhile, they're doing tradeouts of ad space - swapping print space for air time on talk radio, I've heard the spots on KFI. But talk radio is going strong, unlike the Red Dead Tree Media.

WHOA! Just made up my new tagline.


29 posted on 05/02/2005 1:49:46 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Exactly. Why should filthy money or circulation numbers be involved ? If its gonna be a paper for the people, it oughta be free.


30 posted on 05/02/2005 1:50:02 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Maybe they will figure out a way to make the public pay for it.


31 posted on 05/02/2005 1:50:50 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Our herd was wiped-out by 'mad cow' disease, so we don't need your bull anymore LA Times.


32 posted on 05/02/2005 1:51:03 PM PDT by tumblindice ("Journalistic objectivity is simply the attempt to be fair." David Brinkley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Maybe they will figure out a way to make the public pay for it.
There you go! That's what true socialism is all about. Not doing things for free, but rather, on the backs of slaves.
33 posted on 05/02/2005 1:52:39 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Let's all remember the 907,997 Daily and 1,253,849 Sunday figures and then in six months and one year see what
$10Mil buys them. Should be interesting.


34 posted on 05/02/2005 1:55:18 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
The Times has taken the following actions:

* Launched a comprehensive $10 million consumer marketing campaign, including brand advertising and direct marketing efforts.

I've received 4 solicitations in the mail from the Times in the last 6 months. Each time I've taken their Business Reply Envelope, filled it with scrap paper and mailed it back to them.

35 posted on 05/02/2005 1:55:30 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu

Eventually, they've reached everybody who believes the newspaper editor and staff are the smartest, fairest, most unbiased people in the world -- and should be obeyed without question -- and people are willing to consider other sources of information, including and especially their own commonsense, which countless experts, studies and polls the newspaper has underwritten, have incontrovertibly proven should never be trusted. That's what newspapers are for -- once people are out of schools. To do their thinking and speaking for them.


36 posted on 05/02/2005 1:56:54 PM PDT by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu

Eventually, they've reached everybody who believes the newspaper editor and staff are the smartest, fairest, most unbiased people in the world -- and should be obeyed without question -- and people are willing to consider other sources of information, including and especially their own commonsense, which countless experts, studies and polls the newspaper has underwritten, have incontrovertibly proven should never be trusted. That's what newspapers are for -- once people are out of schools. To do their thinking and speaking for them.


37 posted on 05/02/2005 1:57:01 PM PDT by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
* Launched a comprehensive $10 million consumer marketing campaign, including brand advertising and direct marketing efforts.
* Appointed a veteran newspaper circulation executive to a newly created position of senior vice president, circulation to focus entirely on circulation sales and distribution.
* Began executing new circulation programs to grow late-week circulation and Sunday readership.


Do these people not have a clue?
38 posted on 05/02/2005 1:58:18 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave; Blurblogger; Hi Heels
MIDI - OUT OF TIME - right column, next to last MIDI

They are leftists to the core...it's time that they are shown the door
For DemocRATS they're shilling shamelessly
It isn't too surprising...they're losing advertising
They are going down in flames, the poor L.A. TIMES

The gig is almost up for the L.A. TIMES
Let us bid a fond farewell to the L.A. TIMES
They are really out...out to lunch without a doubt
The gig is almost up for the L.A. TIMES

They had tried to stop FR...but they did not get very far
The FReepers grew...they're stronger every day
It isn't too surprising...they're losing advertising
They are going down in flames, the poor L.A. TIMES

The gig is almost up for the L.A. TIMES
Let us bid a fond farewell to the L.A. TIMES
They are really out...out to lunch without a doubt
The gig is almost up for the L.A. TIMES

Lessons they refuse to learn...it's for the truth their readers yearn
And now they can't give it away for free
It isn't too surprising...they're losing advertising
They are going down in flames, the poor L.A. TIMES

The gig is almost up for the L.A. TIMES
Let us bid a fond farewell to the L.A. TIMES
They are really out...out to lunch without a doubt
The gig is almost up for the L.A. TIMES
Oh, the poor L.A. TIMES...oh, the poor L.A. TIMES

39 posted on 05/02/2005 2:06:28 PM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen
Sounds like the Star Tribune, which we used to take on Sunday only. We got a call asking if we'd take the Saturday at half price and said no. A month later, we were offered the Thursday and Friday free, is we would take the half priced Saturday and the full priced Sunday. We said OK, but only if they tossed in a free Wednesday and they agreed.
I always wondered if their circulation dept. reported our papers as part of their base for advertising rates or as give-aways.
40 posted on 05/02/2005 2:07:40 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson