Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illegals flow into Arizona like water through a broken dam
Manchester Union Leader ^ | May 7, 2005 | Renee Downing

Posted on 05/07/2005 5:09:05 AM PDT by billorites

LIKE MANY other southern Arizonans, I am deeply grateful to the few dozen vigilantes calling themselves Minutemen who set up camp along the Arizona-Mexico border last month. That few people around here were much impressed with a bunch of retirees in camouflage playing soldier, and that there turned out to be almost as many reporters as patriots on the ground, was irrelevant: We were just thrilled by the publicity. We’ve been trying to get the rest of the country to notice what’s going on down here for years.

U.S. immigration policy has turned the Arizona desert between Tucson and the border into a nightmare zone of suffering, death, destruction and terrible ironies, and the people who live here are sick to death of it. Human beings, fragile desert and a whole way of life are perishing, and no one out there seems to care.

For example: Ten days ago, the U.S. Border Patrol rescued 77 “illegal entrants” stranded in a barren stretch of desert 20 miles west of Tucson. After walking for five days, they’d overpowered their coyote (people smuggler), taken his cell phone, called 911 and written “Help” in big letters in the sand. Temperatures were in the 90s, and the group had run out of water the day before. Four people were taken to the hospital by ambulance for hyperthermia and dehydration; two stopped breathing while being examined. The story was so familiar, though, that the morning paper didn’t bother to run a follow-up.

The first thing to understand about the border is that the immediate problem isn’t so much the hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants who flood into the United States from Mexico every year. It’s our government’s response to them. While President Bush and others are trying to shape a realistic, orderly guest-worker program, one that would be more humane and presumably free up law enforcement to chase smugglers and terrorists, policy on the ground is to keep everyone out.

From a free-market point of view, this movement of people looks like a classic example of the law of supply and demand. Mexico is poor, overpopulated, intensely corrupt and has a nearly limitless supply of cheap, willing labor. Thanks to the North American Free Trade Agreement, competition with inexpensive American corn has ruined tens of thousands of small Mexican farmers, while many of the light manufacturing plants just south of the border that drew so many northward a decade ago have moved operations to Asia. People are going hungry.

The United States, on the other hand, is rich and needs workers who will take jobs Americans don’t want, for lower wages than Americans will accept. (Try this thought experiment: Imagine suggesting that your teen-ager take a summer job picking melons for 12 hours a day in California.) If, by magic, the Minutemen’s dreams were granted overnight — if the border were sealed and the estimated 11 million people living in this country illegally were deported — America would most likely be unrecognizable, and not in a good way. Crops would rot in the fields, bathrooms would stay dirty, mothers of small children would be stuck at home. America is addicted to cheap labor, and withdrawal is beyond contemplation.

Still, we maintain the pretense that we don’t want a docile underclass of workers coming into the United States, and we keep trying to catch them as they cross an increasingly policed border.

The militarization of what had been a fairly porous border started in the 1980s with Ronald Reagan’s “war on drugs,” but began in earnest in 1994, when the Border Patrol mounted Operation Gatekeeper and started building a fence between San Diego and Tijuana, eventually closing the entire California-Mexico border except for one small, environmentally sensitive gap. Then Operation Hold the Line at El Paso and Operation Rio Grande further east shut down most of the Texas border. These changes did not stop the traffic; they simply funneled it into New Mexico and Arizona.

Operation Safeguard was implemented here in Arizona in the border town of Nogales, where a fence went up dividing the American and Sonoran sides of town and diverting migrants out into the desert. The theory on our side seemed to be that no one would be desperate enough to try to cross 50 waterless miles of the Sonoran or Chihuahan desert on foot.

This supposition has proved to be wrong. The Border Patrol’s apprehensions between Oct. 1, 2003, and Sept. 30, 2004, in the Tucson sector totaled 491,771, or 1,347 per day, but the population of undocumented immigrants “has been growing robustly during most of the period of ‘concentrated border enforcement’,” according to the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. The crossing has not become impossible, just more expensive and dangerous. Since 2000, more than 750 migrants have been found dead in the Arizona desert, according to county medical examiners. And from January 1995 through May 2004, more than 2,600 people have died along the whole border — roughly one death per day, 10 times the rate before operations began. These are just the documented deaths. No one knows how many more lie out there unknown, unrecovered and unrecoverable — after skeletons bleach in the sun long enough, cows and other animals eat them for the calcium.

Driving around the spectacular country south of Tucson, it’s hard to get your mind around the drama taking place just out of sight. A precarious trail along the slopes of the Baboquivari Mountains to the southwest, for instance, became a popular route last year because it’s so hard to patrol. Looking up at the shining white scopes of the National Observatory on Kitt Peak, at the towering sacred monolith of Baboquivari Peak further south, it’s hard to believe that dozens of human beings could be risking their lives on those rugged slopes even as you watch. Anyone who takes a bad fall along that trail is unlikely ever to be found.

The strategy of driving border crossers out into the wilds has also been hell on the people who live north of the line. Ranchers’ land has been covered with trash, their fences cut, livestock scattered, water tanks fouled and property destroyed. Some have given up and left, but it’s hard to sell out because people already know about the trouble. Residents of small, isolated towns have been faced by sudden buildups of equipment and personnel. The Border Patrol set up a “Special Operations” base over the ridge from the tiny settlement of Arivaca without informing inhabitants that 10 large trailers, 10 to 30 trucks, generators, stadium lights and night operations involving helicopters were about to become a feature of their lives for the foreseeable future.

At an emotional meeting held in the Arivaca civic center recently, several people who own land along the ridge poured out their frustration. You build your house next to a wildlife refuge, you tend to think your peace is guaranteed. The Border Patrol was invited to the meeting but did not attend.

The worst and most lasting damage to the landscape, though, is in the 90 percent of the border land that’s owned and theoretically protected by the U.S. government. A chain of wildlife preserves and other protected areas, including Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, is being destroyed, first by the footpaths and litter left by the migrants; second, and more seriously, by quasi-military activities of the Border Patrol.

The Border Patrol is flying Black Hawk helicopters and driving all-terrain vehicles and motorcycles around rare, beautiful desert lands, and no amount of complaint from locals, land managers or environmentalists has slowed them down. It is illegal to take vehicles off-road in national parks and preserves, and illegal for citizens to pull off the awful dirt roads of the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge anyplace where the soil is undisturbed, or to drive at all when the ground is wet. Cabeza Prieta, home to the last 40 Sonoran pronghorn antelope in the United States, is the wildest and driest of American deserts. The Border Patrol has a major base of operations within the refuge. The remaining traces of the centuries-old Camino del Diablo, the Devil’s Highway, have been obliterated, and miles of delicate desert turned to moonscape.

In spite of the collateral damage, what happens next will be more of the same. This March, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Robert C. Bonner announced that the patrol is more than doubling the number of helicopters and planes along the Arizona border and bringing in 534 more agents.

Local opinion on the buildup ranges from outrage among social activists who want an open border all the way to approval from those who think “those people don’t belong here.” Recent immigrants from the Midwest who don’t know or care that Tucson has always been a “brown town” and the desperate ranchers along the border are pleased, if not convinced. Others are horrified that the government, finding that what it’s doing isn’t working, simply proposes to do more of it, and to do it here. The majority just want the whole mess to go away.

And so we who love this beautiful, dying region now live in a sort of occupied zone within our own nation, pinioned by politicians’ indifference and officials’ lack of imagination. We expect another bad summer.

Renee Downing is a freelance writer who has lived in southern Arizona for more than 30 years.


TOPICS: Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006elections; 3rdworld; affirmativeaction; aliens; arizona; az; border; borderpolice; bordersecurity; bordersheriffs; buildthewall; bushamnesty; ca; calborder; california; cannon; cedillo; cedillosucks; closetheborder; commies; dhs; disease; diversity; education; endlatinlobby; englishlanguage; gangs; gingrich; hanes; hatingamericans; haynes; healthcare; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; imigration; immigrantlist; immigration; internationallaw; lapd; losangeles; ma; maldef; mecha; mexa; mikecarona; minutemen; mmp; ms13; newjersey; newmexico; newt; ningunaentradailegal; nj; nm; not1moredime; nv; ny; oneworlders; or; pc; pckills; politalcorrectness; quotas; racialquotas; rayhanes; rayhaynes; realid; rescuecalifornia; screwlaraza; screwmaldef; screwmecha; shadowparty; supporttheusbp; tancredo; texas; tx; ushouse; ut; utah; voterid; wef; whereisgeorgebush; wto; yourtownnext
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-226 next last
To: Dane

U.S. Constitution Article 1 Section 8 Clause 15:

"The Congress shall have Power to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections

and repel Invasions;"


U.S. Constitution Article 4 Section 4:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,

and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"


141 posted on 05/07/2005 6:01:13 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
That's all well and good travis but according to a Fox/Opinion Dynamics poll a majority of people don't see, as you do, people washing dishes and making beds an "invasion".

Opinion is divided on eliminating public assistance, such as education and health benefits, to illegal immigrants and their children. Forty-three percent of Americans favor stopping public assistance for illegal immigrants, while 45 percent oppose it.

Even so, a 62 percent majority, including almost equal majorities of Democrats (65 percent) and Republicans (62 percent), favors allowing illegal immigrants who have jobs in the United States to apply for legal, temporary worker status.

Maybe let up on the bellicose swagger and accusing those who don't agree with you as "un-American" and maybe you can influence more people and win more friends.

BTW, you can put me in the 43% that says that non-citizens shouldn't get welfare benefits.

142 posted on 05/07/2005 6:11:08 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Ive seen you claim to be against illegal immigration. If thats true why all the anger towards anybody who opposes illegal immigration on this site?


143 posted on 05/07/2005 6:53:35 PM PDT by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: onyx
After reading this thread from beginning to end, I'm appalled to see that IslamoCommieObserver was banned while Dane was not.

From what I read, either Dane should have been expelled rather than IslamoCommieObserver, or both.

But what do I know, I'm just a newbie.

144 posted on 05/07/2005 6:53:47 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (H. Clinton: Be afraid, be very, very afraid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Travis McGee; onyx

Dane,

Lady, would you please name one country in the whole wide world that doesn't control its borders, including any country that allows immigration?

If you have no answer to this simple question then quit accusing people of being what they are not.

Please name ONE such country without the why's and why-nots.


145 posted on 05/07/2005 7:02:45 PM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: mthom
Ive seen you claim to be against illegal immigration. If thats true why all the anger towards anybody who opposes illegal immigration on this site?

JMO, I think it is the hyperbole and pompousness of the strident anti illegal side. When I read hyperbole of businesses that produce good honest products and services being called criminal, when they already have enough regulations and roadblocks put in front of them because of govt., it makes me dismiss them.

Business ain't the problem, the govt. is.

146 posted on 05/07/2005 7:04:55 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

would = could


147 posted on 05/07/2005 7:06:20 PM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Just wish I saw you go after government inaction and complicity with the same vigor. Or any vigor.


148 posted on 05/07/2005 7:08:58 PM PDT by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

Dane, are you there?

Apparently you are, any country other than the USA? Google won't help because such country doesn't exist


149 posted on 05/07/2005 7:12:59 PM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: mthom
Just wish I saw you go after government inaction and complicity with the same vigor. Or any vigor.

You mean the vigor some on FR go after those "evil" businesses.

150 posted on 05/07/2005 7:14:23 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Dane

"You mean the vigor some on FR go after those "evil" businesses."

Sure, that would be sufficiently vigorous.


151 posted on 05/07/2005 7:22:34 PM PDT by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Thanks for the bump.


152 posted on 05/07/2005 7:22:40 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

Don't ask me why, but the open borders advocates are untouchable on FR. After inciting the most vicious race-baiting flame wars, at most they get a one week time out. Meanwhile, the patriots they goad into flame wars get the perma-ban. That's how, over time, FR tilts the "playing field" toward the open borders lobby.


153 posted on 05/07/2005 7:24:41 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
We should just adopt and enforce Mexican immigration laws.

For example, if you are an illegal alien in Mexico you are deported if you are lucky. If you return after being deported, you get a ten year prison term.

154 posted on 05/07/2005 7:26:25 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Dane
The point is that America has survived and prospered with every wave of immigrants, be they the Irish, Itlaians, Jews, etc.etc.

That's just the point - they were waves - as in a one time shot. After a few generations, with no ongoing support, they assimilated and became Americans. Most of them wanted to anyways.

The current situation is not a wave but an ongoing and increasing flood. Instead of ghettos forming for a generation or two and then dissolving, they now get constant reinforcements and harden into Third World barrios. The fact that our government panders to them with native language ballots, etc. only insures that they not only take longer to assimilate, in many cases they never do.

The other difference is that a lot of these illegals don't want to become Americans, just live like them. Check out all the Mexican flags/decals on their uninsured heaps.

155 posted on 05/07/2005 7:26:33 PM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dane

No, I don't just "say" I do not hang out these threads, the fact is I don't, and you know it.

Nice try Dane. You can't bait me.

Were you not so woefully ignorant about the illegal invasion,
you wouldn't be posting such pathetic tripe.


156 posted on 05/07/2005 7:32:05 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Travis McGee; onyx; mthom

>>Dane, are you there?

Apparently you are, any country other than the USA? Google won't help because such country doesn't exist.<<

Dane,

You don't have an answer to a very simple question, which puts your arguments in a very bad light.

The result is my new and improved tagline.


157 posted on 05/07/2005 7:32:20 PM PDT by melancholy (Quiz: Name one country, other than the USA, that doesn't control its borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Dane
No previous wave has been rewarded with taxpayer money for being poor Thanks to LBJ.

Viva la 'great society'..... That's where all of this madness started IMHO.........

158 posted on 05/07/2005 7:37:06 PM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
Just keep this definition in mind:

Quisling: a synonym for "traitor", someone who collaborates with the invaders of his country.

159 posted on 05/07/2005 7:37:37 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
Dane,

You don't have an answer to a very simple question, which puts your arguments in a very bad light.

The result is my new and improved tagline

To qualify, how do you mean control it's borders, do you mean like North Korea, where the people eat tree bark?


160 posted on 05/07/2005 7:39:50 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson