Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neville Chamberlain Republican Senators
self | 5/24/05 | exit82

Posted on 05/24/2005 4:52:19 AM PDT by exit82

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: exit82
This morning I sent the following e-mail to the RNC:

After the actions of the "Scarlet Letter" gang in the Bob and Billie Club (formerly U.S. Senate), I direct you to remove my name from all of your mailing lists.

I sent this to:
Ken Mehlman, Chairman - Chairman@gop.com
Jo Ann Davidson, Co-chairman - Info@gop.com
Address changes = Membershipservices@gop.com
41 posted on 05/24/2005 7:16:49 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawgreg

"Alas, once you feed a monster it gets bigger and bolder and soon bites the hands that feed it........"

Isn't that the truth?? That is why I will no longer contribute to the RNC. If their donations drop, maybe we can starve that monster via their pocketbook. That being said, I want to stay on their mailing list, so every single time they send me a letter begging for money, I can send it right back (with the RNC paying the postage) with a note stating my disgust.


42 posted on 05/24/2005 7:44:01 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

Great pic!! That describes them, all right!! Just an aside on my weasel, DeRINO -- on Sunday, our local paper quoted him as saying he didn't care how many calls he got to his office (and he was getting plenty). He wasn't going to pay any attention to them, as he had already made up his mind!! Now, how is that for a representative of the people??!! 'Scuse me, I need to take some more Mylanta.


43 posted on 05/24/2005 7:48:23 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

Remember the immortal words of Otter in Animal House, "You f'd up, you trusted us." That should be the Rats new motto.


44 posted on 05/24/2005 7:51:00 AM PDT by dfwgator (Flush Newsweek!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

I gotta start doing that. I just tear it up. My money is going for more important things.......like helping the troops and their families.


45 posted on 05/24/2005 8:15:04 AM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dawgreg

Maybe the RNC and the GOP senators will get the message when and if their money dries up. Since money drives politicians and political parties, that is the only thing they understand. Of course, if the GOP gets really desperate, they can go begging to George Soros!


46 posted on 05/24/2005 8:31:04 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Humble Servant
I ask you all very seriously, "IS IT TIME FOR A NEW PARTY?"

Yes, something semi-honorable to replace the completely tainted and corrupted demoncrappy party. After we get their colitis we can clean up the other less-corrupted party.

47 posted on 05/24/2005 8:36:33 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Humble Servant

"I ask you all very seriously, "IS IT TIME FOR A NEW PARTY?""

No, it's time to kick out the Judas clowns that infect this one.


48 posted on 05/24/2005 8:38:43 AM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

Shoot Polyxene, they don't have to go to Soros. Any ol' Senator will do. They've set themselves up well, financially speaking. Let them cough up the money. Hehehehehe.


49 posted on 05/24/2005 8:46:02 AM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Sent to Senator Allen this morning:

It was with a heavy heart that I read the news of the deal ending the fight over filibusters, for a number of reasons:
1. President Bush has laid out an aggressive, broad agenda that begins to meet the challenges of our nation. Recent polls reflect citizens' disappointment, on both sides of the aisle, in acting at all. The deepest reservations though, must be reserved for Republicans, who it seems since 1994 have promised much but never seem to deliver. This interminable haggling over judges is just one more brick in the wall blocking advancement.
2. Even considering education reform, which on its present course is threatening to economically consume all of us even in its socially misguided decline, electing intelligent, fair, conservative judges must remain the single most important activity this government can perform. The Democrats seem to understand this; why not the Republicans? Do we not truly believe our own rhetoric? McCain must be off his rocker. He may be a great American, but he’s a terrible Republican.
3. As I see it, we've gained 3 judges we would have gained had the rule been changed, lost 2 we would have otherwise gained, and the filibuster lives on to be invoked again. After all these months of waiting, it is difficult for interested onlookers like me to see how we ‘won.’
4. With the war time world canvas providing an especially urgent backdrop to this Congress, we find backroom dealings even while we endlessly debate without seeming to get at the heart of the issues. Graham’s pandering to “…kids dying…” is disgusting in this milieu. Certainly our soldiers are dying for freedom and democracy, but they are not dying to have Meyer and Saad never have a vote. Compromise is the worst of politics, not the best.
5. The ‘deal’ preserves obstructionist Senate politics, and nothing more. It merely delays the showdown that must come as Democrats move more sharply left, and Republicans attempt to undo the judicial and cultural and economic blunders of the past. Unfortunately in the name of ‘bipartisanship,’ the generals have already sacrificed two of our best soldiers before we even enjoin the fight.
Senator Allen, I know you have been an aggressive and tireless fighter on this front. It is with leadership like yours that many of us remain encouraged. Make us proud. We have much to do, and many of us support the ideas upon which this administration was elected.
Please don’t allow this Congress to forget why we elected them with so much emotion. Compromise with a party moving left, moves the center.
Thank you for your time.


50 posted on 05/24/2005 8:47:38 AM PDT by Conservative Virginian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Virginian

Good letter. Count me amoung those who favor George Allen in '8.


51 posted on 05/24/2005 8:51:08 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Dawgreg

Yea, funny, isn't it, that these guys go to Washington with a little bit of money, just regular folks, then ZOWIE -- they end up millionaires (or billionaires) in just six years of being a senator!


52 posted on 05/24/2005 8:55:22 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: exit82
what you said:

We have seven Republican Senators who have betrayed their party, their country, and the Constitution.

They have accomplished "peace in our times" by allowing the Democrats to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat in regard to the judicial nominees.

They have not only sold us out, but they sold us out for no gain. All they have accomplished is that the filibustering of nominees has merely been kicked down the road, to a time and place of the Democrats' choosing.

53 posted on 05/24/2005 9:04:12 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Air Conditioned Gypsy

The best way to make the 7 republican sell-outs irrelevant is to make the GOP majority bigger so they are no longer "swing votes."

Easier said than done, but a worthy goal nonetheless.

54 posted on 05/24/2005 9:07:23 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: maggiefluffs

yes, why is this jackendofahorse Warner smiling?


55 posted on 05/24/2005 9:08:45 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: randita

I respectfully disagree. This compromise moves the bar for what might be considered "extraordinary cases" to nominees which are somewhere to the right of David Duke.

Just read the compilation of trash talk comments Dems spouted about Owen and Brown. After all the vitriol directed at those two upstanding, highly competent ladies and they are going to allow them to have a vote? This is a concession that they are not "extraordinary cases".

This is a huge victory becauase two ladies whom conservatives would LOVE to have on the SCOTUS are now inoculated when and if they are nominated for it.

I was reading this post just as Rush made a comment on it/this very idea, with which I agree:

So you're saying that the Rats won't go so far as to be intellectually dishonest the next time a conservative nominee is up? Please.

I wish you were right, but I don't think so.

56 posted on 05/24/2005 9:12:25 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

I know dat's right. And how about those who (mostly Demonrats) that came in with more money than Fort Knox?


57 posted on 05/24/2005 9:15:50 AM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent
So you're saying that the Rats won't go so far as to be intellectually dishonest the next time a conservative nominee is up? Please.

No, I don't think they will dishonestl, because the 14 moderates (7 from each party) have effectively put the Dem leadership on notice that they won't go along with the sham. Else why even go through the motions of cutting this so-called "deal". There are obviously a handful of Democrats and a handful of Republicans that aren't in lock step with their leadership. The key is to get enough of them on the our side to total 60 votes. This deal may have given them the cover they needed to do the right thing.

58 posted on 05/24/2005 10:07:20 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: exit82
TRAITORS!!! COWARDS!!!! SELLOUTS!!!
59 posted on 05/24/2005 10:29:27 AM PDT by Sister_T (Starve a RINO!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawgreg

Millionaire/Billionaire RATs, ala Fat Ted Kennedy -- so much for the common man. They feel our pain/know just how we feel -- yea, right -- and I just saw a pig fly by my window!!


60 posted on 05/24/2005 10:35:15 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson