Skip to comments.Cease Fire on Animals Streets of New Orleans (Please Sign Petition)
Posted on 09/10/2005 11:21:16 PM PDT by BagCamAddict
Please sign the online petition to stop the killing of pets in New Orleans. Conflicting reports abound, regarding whether orders have been given to shoot abandoned pets. But just in case it is or becomes true, please sign the online petitions below to STOP the killing:
And the following petition adds the words "and their pets" to the order to evacuate people from New Orleans. Please sign it also:
"But it is not conjecture that some people died when they stayed behind due to their pets."
And all these years, I thought Darwin was wrong. Oh well, the gene pool needs a good purge every now and then.
Please note that the site presented by this person is 100% devoted to promoting left wing causes.
Someone with more knowledge may want to check out OP and make sure he is not a DU troll.
"Most of them will end up euthanized."
People all over the country are already calling shelters begging to adopt any pets who aren't claimed.
They love the idea of having a "disaster survivor" in the family.
I see it all the time locally.
Some stray dog or cat beats the odds and people nearly mob the SPCA trying to adopt it.
And I would imagine that trained soldiers have sense enough to fashion temporary muzzles.
[who even mentioned soldiers rescuing them anyway? we're talking privately funded civilian animal rescuers here]
You're right about that, I guess I was tongue tie LOL!
What it is to me is a diversion of resources and questionable agents operating in a disaster area.
Yea right. I've had to shoot my own dog before, wasn't pleasant, but it was better that letting it suffer. It's not a sporting even either. Nice dramatic touch though.
You bet. It's America and the private party has the right to do this. That does not mean they are not misguided, stupid, and wrong. Because the focus on saving pets when people are still in trouble is sickening to this proud American.
"Please note that the site presented by this person is 100% devoted to promoting left wing causes."
Even a blind pig finds an acorn now and then.
Lefties or not, what they're trying to do with *this* is a good thing.
[now quit trying to spook the herd]...;)
What makes you think it wouldn't bother any of us, too? If you're really farm-raised, you know the mindset.
Is that like Poppycock or something?
It's not piffle, it's the truth. But these farce groups like the money you send them, keep giving and loving. They'll keep tagging and bagging, sending their weekly load to the landfill
Bottom line: FR is being used to promote a left wing extremist website under false pretence.
I have reported this thread as such and await further developments.
As far as the subject at hand, the irrational approach of some of you here who put saving dogs as more important than humans... well... such thought is a fundamental philosophy of the left wing extremists in this great country I call home. I suspect anyone who casts their lots with that philosophy as being one of them.
When posting a story or editorial it is important to use the original title to avoid duplication. The title you created has been changed to the correct published title.
Also do not change the source name. The source name you used has been changed to the correct source name.
The ASPCA and HSUS are "questionable agents"??
Since they -only- deal with animals and all their funds are devoted soley to animals, exactly what -human- "resources" are being diverted?
Now now, personal threats are a bit much don't you think?
No, it's not 100% left wing. It's an open site that anyone can post any petition to. But even if it was, so what? This isn't about that website, this is about signing the petition for the animals.
But if you're referring to the second page that pops up when you sign the petition (the one asking which things you want to be notified about), I saw that too and thought "oh no, what is this all about" -- but then I saw one of the options is for Republican Party information.
Thank you. Wonder why he felt it was necessary to hide the true source of the link? I am just suspicious since the OP is promoting a radical left wing extremist site.
I went through the signing process to check it out and it is something straight from the dark, smelly bowels of DU.
Have you ever checked into how many animals these groups send to animal heaven a week? You should. You may be suprized.
I agree with you there. But I think it should be purged of people who don't have compassion for the animals that we are responsible for. Those pets didn't ask to be locked inside homes or chained on chains that were too short to escape the rising waters. We are responsible for them, and that responsibility includes their welfare, just like we are responsible for our children and our elderly. It doesn't have to be one OR the other.
Sorry, but I have to call you out on this one.
1. It IS a 100% radical left wing extremist site. Anyone can check it out and see that I am right.
2. You were worried enough about that fact that you felt you had to hide the URL in your linking at the top of your post.
I have lurked here long enough to wonder if they need to call in the kitties. Just wondering you know.
My rescue group of choice is www.noahswish.org.
And again, what's it to YOU who I or anyone else may or may not give money to?
[and piffle was the most polite "@!#$&%!!" thing I could say without feeling the power of ZOT]
"As far as the subject at hand, the irrational approach of some of you here who put saving dogs as more important than humans... well... "
The whole thing is a bit too similar to the Green Party agenda for me. Save the trees, save the wetlands, save the whales, save the dogs, forget the humans.
"I agree with you there. But I think it should be purged of people who don't have compassion for the animals that we are responsible for. Those pets didn't ask to be locked inside homes or chained on chains that were too short to escape the rising waters. We are responsible for them, and that responsibility includes their welfare, just like we are responsible for our children and our elderly. It doesn't have to be one OR the other."
Excuse me? So, mutts are just as important as children and elderly? Get a grip.
Why are you scared of ZOT? It is my understanding from the reading I have done that the kitties only pursue those who are left wing wackos. Not someone who violates a rule.
I'm finding it hard to believe you are so myopic.
They are questionable agents because they are not trained and equipted to operate in a disaster area...particularly one of this character.
It is a radical left wing philosophy for sure. Kinda makes me wonder if a couple of sleepers didn't just make a big mistake. Who knows? I am new to posting but have read here daily for months now.
The HSUS is firmly aligned with the left wing of this fine country.
Whoa there nellie. I haven't seen ONE person on here post anything about saving dogs BEFORE humans or dogs being MORE important than humans. You might want to keep your personal phobias under control.
And no one is "promoting" that website. Good grief.
Perhaps I'm merely assuming that you speak like that to "pet nuts" in the "real world" but somehow, I seriously doubt that you do.
That was not a personal threat.
Just advice that, in hindsight, was probably not even remotely necessary.
Your ad hominem vulgarities began this, if you'll recall.
If that timeline confuses you, please note whose posts were pulled and whose were not.
They're not left wingers. They're just misguided by puppy love. My next door neighbor is the same way. Her husband and I talked about it last week. Sadly, he said she'd be one of the people who'd refuse to leave her dogs. So, he'd have to pack up the kids and leave her.
Sunday, Sep 11, 2005
Racial Justice Group Launches Progressive Blog! A new blog, launched by the Advancement Project, is giving progressive voices an up-to-the moment way to share news, and exchange views on important civil rights/racial justice issues. Visit www.justdemocracyblog.org to say informed of the latest racial justice issues, like voting rights, educational opportunities, immigrant rights, policing, and economic justice. Read More.
Iraq Body Count: 25,000 Civilians Killed in Two Year War The Iraq Body Count and Oxford Research Group, an organization of academics and peace activists, has compiled over 10,000 media reports and estimates that 25,000 civilians have died violently in Iraq since the start of the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003.
QUOTE OF THE DAY (more) "Sooner or later, wittingly or unwittingly, we must pay for every intrusion on the natural environment." -- Barry Commoner, US biologist/environmentalist.
I'm sure if I keep looking, Cindy Sheeman blows kisses your way too.
My apologies. I definitely goofed on all those posting guidelines. Thank you for correcting everything.
You are welcome.
Yeah, and have you ever seen a dog fly a helicopter? Not a pretty sight, especially if the dog isn't trained.
Sir, you just lied. You WERE promoting that website by posting it and imploring readers to go there.
All of the true animal lovers are asking the same thing, believe me.
We know their true agenda, and it's not about the animals for them. So it's no surprise they are dramatically ABSENT from all the Katrina stories.
I'm the most conservative, Republican person I know up here in the liberal hellhole of Boston, and I got bleeped! Besides which, I've gotten the shit beaten out of me for opening my mouth about being a Republican.
There was no profanity, just honesty, nothing anti-conservative, nothing racist, just pro-human, and anti MSM, anti PETA-based CNN coverage. Oh well.
I hope the families that have lost loved ones (HUMAN BEINGS) appreciate your efforts to rescue stray pets BEFORE the remains of their families have even been identified.
You might consider that these people LEFT THEIR PETS to save themselves and their HUMAN families.
I'm glad I stopped contributing money.
Quite aware of it, thanks.
That's why I donate elsewhere.
Since they're the biggest game in town with the most public pull, they're currently the animal's best hope, faults or no.
Not sure why you addressed this post to me as my posts have not been circular at all. I am presenting facts that apply to this thread.
"Bad language" can get you ZOTTED in a heartbeat whether you're left, right or middle....;))
[and it depends on the "Mood of the All Powerful Mods®"]
FYI, "He" (me) didn't "feel it was necessary to hide the true source of the link" -- I was simply way too exhausted to do everything correctly at this late hour. Furthermore, the "true source" of MY source for the petition was from Petfinder.com, where I found the link, where many of the lost and found animals from Katrina are being posted. I wasn't trying to HIDE anything, I was just too tired to figure it all out and do it right when I made the post (thinking those details weren't particularly important anyway).
I thought only PETA did that
That says a whole lot about these people, and little nilly crying because he left his dog on a hwy. If these animals were really just a member of the familly, it would be like chaining their kid to the porch then leaving it behind. These are drama stories to get you to donate. This care2 site is a enviroweenie site, save the rainforrests, global warming, anti hunting Lefty BS. And you gave them money? I'd feel used, if I were you.
Really? I thought bad language just got you slap, temporary suspensions, etc. But never the KITTIES. Of course, that is just what I picked up from lurking so I may be wrong. And since you already admitted to being the type who is prone to using bad language i am sure you know more about it than I do.
oops, not YOU, the guy who posted this petition.
Whatever you say.
Every animal shelter, humane society does it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.