Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Weekly Battle Over War in Iraq (A certain group of radical ultra-rightwingers mentioned)
Washington Post ^ | 10/30/05 | Allan Lengel

Posted on 10/30/2005 4:10:30 AM PST by Valin

Outside Walter Reed on Friday Nights, Two Camps Stand Their Ground

Every Friday night, Gael Murphy and Kristinn Taylor meet in Northwest Washington, separated by a bustling four-lane road -- and a whole lot more.

Since spring, the two have stood firmly on opposite sides of Georgia Avenue NW in front of Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Murphy leading a coalition of war protesters, Taylor marshaling supporters of the Iraq war.

Both sides say they are there to support the troops. Beyond that, there's little common ground.

"They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name," said Murphy, a co-founder of the women's antiwar group Code Pink. "It's aimed at disrupting our vigil."

To Taylor, a spokesman for the local chapter of FreeRepublic.com, a politically conservative Web site, disruption is an honorable goal.

"It's galling for us to see them across the street," he said. "They've endorsed the terrorists."

The Friday night gatherings near the District's northern tip, about six miles north of the White House, have become one of the most visible reminders in Washington of a war that has claimed the lives of more than 2,000 U.S. troops. That they are being staged outside a military hospital that treats the war's wounded makes the standoffs all the more pointed -- and controversial.

The war supporters, many of them known as "Freepers" because of their devotion to FreeRepublic.com, insist it is unpatriotic and demoralizing to protest the war in clear view of wounded soldiers. They started congregating along Georgia Avenue on Fridays after learning that the protesters were out there delivering a "despicable" message.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Free Republic; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: activismchapters; allanlengel; codepink; codepinkdc; codepinko; dcchapter; freeps; walterreed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
To: kristinn
Surprisingly, a pretty fair article from the WP.

Keep up the good work!

21 posted on 10/30/2005 4:42:06 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

Ain't that the truth.


22 posted on 10/30/2005 4:44:45 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

It's not the investigative piece on Code Pink and the "antiwar" left we've been waiting four years for The Post to write, but it is a decent report on the "Friday night fights" as he put it.


23 posted on 10/30/2005 4:46:38 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Landry Fan; kristinn

That's what I was thinking. He was definitely sympathetic to the Murphy side.

Thanks Kristinn and D.C. Chapter for your vigilence.


24 posted on 10/30/2005 4:51:51 AM PST by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
The members of the D.C. Chapter have done a great job of showing up every Friday night for seven months--consistently outnumbering the Pinkos.

Thank you D.C. Chapter.

25 posted on 10/30/2005 4:54:07 AM PST by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Could they quote Gail Murphy a little more??? This started off looking like a decent article but turns out to be more of a hit peice on FR the farther you read. Not surprised.


26 posted on 10/30/2005 5:01:55 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Gael Murphy WHINES.


27 posted on 10/30/2005 5:13:38 AM PST by Landry Fan (Proud Supporter of the President and the US Military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Landry Fan

It's truly insulting for the reporter to favor the anti's side without even going inside and asking the soldiers their opinion. You guys have gone to extreme sacrifice to be there every Fri. You deserve a real story. Media....Grrrrrrrrrr.


28 posted on 10/30/2005 5:20:52 AM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Landry Fan

Yes, she does. ("Mom, he's making faces at me")
And tattles, too.


29 posted on 10/30/2005 5:26:23 AM PST by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cathy

Actually, both sides and points of view are equally presented. There are nine references each to quotes by Freepers, their message and a supportive soldier and the same number for Code Pink.


30 posted on 10/30/2005 5:31:16 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Murphy rejects that claim, saying she and others paid their own way on the fact-finding mission, which also sought to let Iraqis know that not all Americans supported war.

In other words, the "fact-finding mission" was a pretext and a lie, intended to disguise their real mission which was to give aid and comfort to Saddam Hussein, which is typically what you would expect from leftists.

"We treat them with a contempt that they've earned," he said.

Great quote, Kristinn...

31 posted on 10/30/2005 5:31:53 AM PST by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
....to remind the public of the wounded troops and to point out inadequacies in their medical benefits.

What a load!!!! This from the same idiots that want socialized medicine....UFB!!!!

"The administration sent these soldiers to war. Now that they're back and injured, they don't want to see them or hear about them,"

These men were not drafted, they volunteered, and once they are healed and able to do so, they will be back in Iraq, killing terrorist....As for as seeing and hearing about them, how many times has Pres. Bush toured Army hospitals and talked to the soldiers, praying with and to them, and how many times did the Klintoon do the same?

Question for the "Pinkos", "Where were you and your protests when the Klintoon sent troops to Somalia, Bosnia, and various other $hithole countries, with orders to not return fire if shot at????" I'll not hold my breath waiting for an answer....

32 posted on 10/30/2005 5:38:15 AM PST by dirtbiker (I've tried to see the liberal point of view, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Good morning, and thanks to you and the DC chapter for all you do.

5.56mm

33 posted on 10/30/2005 5:39:34 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician
Thanks.

A Google search turned up this article that says the Code Pinkos were guests of Saddam Hussein. This from someone whowent on the trip with Code Pink. I have no reason to doubt Gael paid her own travel expenses, but once she got there it's a good bet Saddam said, "You're money's no good here," as the excerpt below this one shows.

Stephens traveled with a delegation of women sponsored by Code Pink for Peace, an organization of women who have been holding a peace vigil outside the White House since Nov. 17. The delegation was composed of a dozen women, some of whom were members of Code Pink, and others, like Stephens, who went along for the experience. Her husband, George Sapio, accompanied the group as its photographer and a videographer joined them as well.

The group left from John F. Kennedy International Airport and traveled a total of 44 hours. After stopping in Amsterdam, the delegation flew to Amman, Jordan, and then traveled 15 hours in Chevy Suburbans to arrive in Baghdad. U.N. sanctions prohibit all air travel to Iraq.

Since they were guests of the Iraqi government, Stephens said, the members of the delegation were accompanied by government-assigned handlers throughout most of the trip.

As far as I know, this piece was not written by a Code Pinko, but the author was in Baghdad at the same time as the Pinkos.

A mixed bag of these arrived in Baghdad shortly before midnight on February 15, 2003, International Peace Day, as two double-decker busloads of western Human Shields arrived at the Andalus Apartments hotel where I was staying. These people were willing to use their bodies as shields, placing themselves in infrastructure buildings and hospitals as a human repellent to bombs. They also brought with them their own unique war. Many were contentious—bickering and openly fighting amongst themselves while taking in the free residency and meals supplied by the Saddam regime that welcomed their support.

34 posted on 10/30/2005 5:47:08 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Peach; Mo1; Jim Robinson; kristinn

FR gets article in Wash ComPost. Ping to patriots countering the Code Pinko traitors


35 posted on 10/30/2005 5:51:52 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Wasn't the Washington Post part of that lawsuit against Free Republic? And if they were, shouldn't they have mentioned that in the interests of good journalism?

Bias that leap outs immediately:

Calling Freepers "War Supporters"...we didn't want war, but Iraq invaded our ally, Kuwait, and supported 9/11 terrorists, that's how it all started. No FReepers support war in and of itself. They could say "Anti-Saddam protestors," "US Foreign Policy Supporters," "Iraq Constitution Supporters" or even the ironic "UN Resolution Supporters!" They didn't even say "Iraq War Supporters."

Saying only the pro American side shoves or crosses the street to the other side. That was laughable.

Not explaining the obvious "anti-war" links to Communism and especially that of Code Pink. Can't they type "Code Pink" and "communist" into a search engine? Is that too hard for the intrepid reporters at the Post?

Ignoring the flag draped coffins and extreme signs the "anti-war" stopped using. Why did they stop? Why do they now quit before 9:00 pm to avoid the soldier's bus?

The article is full of "sly" digs and does smack of a hit piece but they were a little too obvious. Discerning readers will know what this proven liberal media organ is up to. Many readers will go to FreeRepublic.com and find out the facts.
36 posted on 10/30/2005 5:55:47 AM PST by \/\/ayne (Give me liberty or give me the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Landry Fan

The reporter could have followed Cindy into the John....
; )


37 posted on 10/30/2005 5:58:49 AM PST by freema (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk; kristinn
I didn't even know we had spokesmen.

I, for one, am honored to have Kristinn as my representative!

38 posted on 10/30/2005 5:59:28 AM PST by airborne (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; prairiebreeze

Good job, kristinn. Thanks for all you do.


39 posted on 10/30/2005 6:01:10 AM PST by Peach (I believe Congressman Weldon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I wonder if atleast one of those modern journalist ever itched to find out and write the real story?


40 posted on 10/30/2005 6:03:32 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson