Wow. Moving the electron closer to the proton. Why didn't I think of that?
They STILL get multimillionaires willing to chip in on perpetual motion machines?
AntiGuv - thanks for the ping
Sis, Doc - y'all might want to ask AntiGuv to add your names to his emerging tech pinglist.
It probably uses a negative resistor.
judging all of these 'smart-mouth' replies on here - I can see exactly how the USA is now way below most of the civilized wolrd in science mathematics and morals.
Most of these comments were simple ridicules of an idea and how to denegrate innovation and imagination.
Sickening display of the socialist mind.
This is scientific heresy. According to quantum mechanics, electrons can only exist in an atom in strictly defined orbits, and the shortest distance allowed between the proton and electron in hydrogen is fixed. The two particles are simply not allowed to get any closer.
Hmmmmm. . . . A UNC chemist vs. the European Space Agency.
I'll go with the UNC guy.
:') Seems like there was an earlier FR topic about this, but I'm tired and undermotivated to look for it.
The flux capacitor...it's what makes time travel possible...
IF you have a ping list on such, please put me on it.
I think the key question is whether the puppet masters will allow it out.
Then, if so, why and to what ends.
If now, how will they swat this one down.
Interesting times. Supposedly this is but one of 3 or 4 different essentially free energy technologies available.
Amateur mathematician's time theories published at last
New Zealand Herald | 31.07.2003 11.04 am | NZPA
Posted on 07/31/2003 4:01:59 AM EDT by JerseyHighlander
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/955624/posts
New model 'permits time travel'
BBC | 6/17/05 | Julianna Kettlewell
Posted on 06/17/2005 3:06:22 PM EDT by LibWhacker
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1425167/posts
No paradox for time travellers
New Scientist | 6/18/05 | Mark Buchanan
Posted on 06/20/2005 12:35:37 PM EDT by LibWhacker
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1426709/posts