Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Collects Gravity Data to Test Einstein's Theory
Space.com ^ | November 17th, 2005 | Patrick Barry and Tony Phillips

Posted on 11/25/2005 11:39:27 AM PST by Termite_Commander

Is Earth in a vortex of space-time?

We'll soon know the answer: A NASA/Stanford physics experiment called Gravity Probe B (GP-B) recently finished a year of gathering science data in Earth orbit. The results, which will take another year to analyze, should reveal the shape of space-time around Earth--and, possibly, the vortex.

Time and space, according to Einstein's theories of relativity, are woven together, forming a four-dimensional fabric called "space-time." The tremendous mass of Earth dimples this fabric, much like a heavy person sitting in the middle of a trampoline. Gravity, says Einstein, is simply the motion of objects following the curvaceous lines of the dimple.

If Earth were stationary, that would be the end of the story. But Earth is not stationary. Our planet spins, and the spin should twist the dimple, slightly, pulling it around into a 4-dimensional swirl. This is what GP-B went to space to check

The idea behind the experiment is simple:

Put a spinning gyroscope into orbit around the Earth, with the spin axis pointed toward some distant star as a fixed reference point. Free from external forces, the gyroscope's axis should continue pointing at the star--forever. But if space is twisted, the direction of the gyroscope's axis should drift over time. By noting this change in direction relative to the star, the twists of space-time could be measured.

In practice, the experiment is tremendously difficult.

The four gyroscopes in GP-B are the most perfect spheres ever made by humans. These ping pong-sized balls of fused quartz and silicon are 1.5 inches across and never vary from a perfect sphere by more than 40 atomic layers. If the gyroscopes weren't so spherical, their spin axes would wobble even without the effects of relativity.

According to calculations, the twisted space-time around Earth should cause the axes of the gyros to drift merely 0.041 arcseconds over a year. An arcsecond is 1/3600th of a degree. To measure this angle reasonably well, GP-B needed a fantastic precision of 0.0005 arcseconds. It's like measuring the thickness of a sheet of paper held edge-on 100 miles away.

GP-B researchers invented whole new technologies to make this possible. They developed a "drag free" satellite that could brush against the outer layers of Earth's atmosphere without disturbing the gyros. They figured out how to keep Earth's penetrating magnetic field out of the spacecraft. And they concocted a device to measure the spin of a gyro--without touching the gyro.

Pulling off the experiment was an exceptional challenge. A lot of time and money was on the line, but the GP-B scientists appear to have done it.

"There were not any major surprises" in the experiment's performance, says physics professor Francis Everitt, the Principal Investigator for GP-B at Stanford University. Now that data-taking is complete, he says the mood among the GP-B scientists is "a lot of enthusiasm, and a realization also that a lot of grinding hard work is ahead of us."

A careful, thorough analysis of the data is underway. The scientists will do it in three stages, Everitt explains. First, they will look at the data from each day of the year-long experiment, checking for irregularities. Next they'll break the data into roughly month-long chunks, and finally they'll look at the whole year. By doing it this way, the scientists should be able to find any problems that a more simple analysis might miss.

Eventually scientists around the world will scrutinize the data. Says Everitt, "we want our sternest critics to be us."

The stakes are high. If they detect the vortex, precisely as expected, it simply means that Einstein was right, again. But what if they don't? There might be a flaw in Einstein's theory, a tiny discrepancy that heralds a revolution in physics.

First, though, there are a lot of data to analyze. Stay tuned.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: astronomy; crevolist; einstein; gravity; nasa; physics; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 11/25/2005 11:39:28 AM PST by Termite_Commander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander; PatrickHenry

bump


2 posted on 11/25/2005 11:42:21 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

3 posted on 11/25/2005 11:45:11 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, dotard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander

I heard the lead NASA scientist is named Zefram Cochrane.


4 posted on 11/25/2005 11:48:38 AM PST by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander
"Put a spinning gyroscope into orbit around the Earth, with the spin axis pointed toward some distant star as a fixed reference point. Free from external forces . . ."

That's a loaded assumption. Orbiting the earth, external forces would still be acting upon the gyroscope. Earth's gravity (inversely proportional to distance but still significant to at least the moon and beyond), Jupiter's gravity, solar wind, solar particles, impact particles, van Allen belt magnetics, etc. Of course, the whole Milky Way galaxy is gravitationally wedded, as is the local galaxy cluster so I'm not sure how one would design an experiment "free from external forces".

5 posted on 11/25/2005 11:49:22 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I think this is the official website: GRAVITY PROBE B.
6 posted on 11/25/2005 11:50:02 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, dotard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander

bump


7 posted on 11/25/2005 11:51:14 AM PST by Mr_Moonlight (Rebuild the Twin Towers just as they were before, only taller this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
A careful, thorough analysis of the data is underway. The scientists will do it in three stages, Everitt explains. First, they will look at the data from each day of the year-long experiment, checking for irregularities. Next they'll break the data into roughly month-long chunks, and finally they'll look at the whole year. By doing it this way, the scientists should be able to find any problems that a more simple analysis might miss.

Looks like a well-designed experiment...

8 posted on 11/25/2005 11:58:52 AM PST by phantomworker (We don't see things as they are, we see things as WE are. Perception is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander

my head hurts


9 posted on 11/25/2005 12:04:27 PM PST by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander

In short, general relativity predicts that a massive rotating object (like the earth) distorts the space around it in such a way that nearby objects that are locally at rest are actually rotating slightly when compared to distant stars. Now, if we are in one of those time vortex's do we get paid time and a-half?


10 posted on 11/25/2005 12:05:40 PM PST by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeRep

The effect will be very small, so I think it will work out to be time-and-a-quintillionth.


11 posted on 11/25/2005 12:25:25 PM PST by Erasmus (Getting captivated by modern music leads to Stockhausen Syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
I'm not sure how one would design an experiment "free from external forces".

You don't have to. That was just put in the article by way of explanation: even if there are no external forces, the axis will precess, because spacetime itself is twisting.

What you need in the real world is an experiment where all external forces have been accurately accounted for.

12 posted on 11/25/2005 12:25:32 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
If they detect the vortex, precisely as expected, it simply means that Einstein was right, again.

Unless it means, "Scientists see what they want to see" blah blah blah! </Luddite_mode>

13 posted on 11/25/2005 12:28:17 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

ping


14 posted on 11/25/2005 12:30:16 PM PST by solitas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander
By doing it this way, the scientists should be able to… stay employed for a long time.
15 posted on 11/25/2005 12:31:19 PM PST by solitas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Unless it means, "Scientists see what they want to see" blah blah blah! </Luddite_mode>

And if the numbers do not match Einstein's predictions we will see "scientists" scramble to suggest convoluted explanations along the lines of dark energy.

Later, truly innovative scientists, ones who appreciate the role of epistemology and philosophy, will step up to the plate and present another elegant solution in the fashion of Einstein.

Then of course, the scientific realists around this forum will take credit and claim another victory for scientific "truth."
16 posted on 11/25/2005 1:17:07 PM PST by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
When the first cracks in relativity appear, if it ever happens, it will be hard to have the new theory ready to go. That hardly makes the first scientists to address the problem less real than the later ones.
17 posted on 11/25/2005 1:20:22 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander
"To measure this angle reasonably well, GP-B needed a fantastic precision of 0.0005 arcseconds. It's like measuring the thickness of a sheet of paper held edge-on 100 miles away."

More money for the Nerds!
More money for the Nerds!

They're certainly better with numbers than our bozos in Washington.

18 posted on 11/25/2005 1:23:17 PM PST by manwiththehands (Happy Thanksgiving to our heroes in Iraq. God bless you and Godspeed. Come home safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
What you need in the real world is an experiment where all external forces have been accurately accounted for.

Or at least try to identify the major external forces. The rest could be combined as noise. The question is, in this case, how would anyone know that all relevent forces have been identified and isolated, free from dependence. How would anyone know that there isn't a rogue force out there as yet still unidentified?

19 posted on 11/25/2005 1:24:23 PM PST by phantomworker (We don't see things as they are, we see things as WE are. Perception is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

This is neat.

We are now performing experiments to test the theories of gravity (general relativity) and quantum mechanics that are approaching 100 years old.

We are now taking data in what have been classic "thought experiments". Gravity Probe B has gyroscopes containing the most perfect spheres ever made.


20 posted on 11/25/2005 1:30:24 PM PST by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson