Posted on 12/02/2005 9:49:50 PM PST by Mike10542
Snap Judgment: Dear Steven Spielberg By CALEV BEN-DAVID
I hope you will not think me presumptuous, but given our long relationship I feel entitled to offer you some unsolicited advice regarding Munich, your new movie scheduled to premiere later this month.
Our relationship began of course back in 1971 when I saw your first feature film, the thrilling made-for-TV movie Duel, and later enthusiastically described it in detail to my friends. It continued during my years at the NYU film school, when I defended Jaws, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, E.T. - and yes, even 1941 - as the works of a true cinematic artist, and not simply the proficient technician some of my fellow movie mavens initially took you for.
I felt vindicated when you deepened the range of your creative palette by tackling such darker and more complex material as The Color Purple, Empire of the Sun and Amistad. And how personally gratified I felt when you finally grappled with your own Jewish background by making the brilliant and wrenching Schindler's List.
Now you are preparing to release Munich, which focuses on the Mossad operation that set out to track down and assassinate the Palestinian perpetrators of the terror attack on the 1972 Olympics that left 11 Israeli athletes dead. Sight unseen, the movie is already raising serious concerns - and no wonder.
IT WAS certainly surprising that in preparing for the film you chose not to personally speak with any of the surviving participants, both Israeli and Palestinian, of the events your film describes. This is even more disturbing in light of reports that one of your source materials is the George Jonas book Vengeance, whose account of the Munich massacre aftermath has been largely discredited since it was first published. No wonder that former Mossad chief Zvi Zamir, who oversaw the operation, has publicly taken your research methods to task.
Also disturbing was your choice of American-Jewish playwright Tony Kushner, an outspoken left-wing critic of Israel, to co-write the screenplay of Munich. Kushner has gone on record in declaring that "Zionism is an unappealing and problematic heritage" and "Zionism aimed at the establishment of a national identity is predicated on a reading of Jewish history and an interpretation of the meaning of Jewish history that I don't share."
Nor, Steven, was I reassured by your one official media statement issued during the filming of Munich last summer: "Viewing Israel's response to Munich through the eyes of the men who were sent to avenge that tragedy adds a human dimension to a horrific episode that we usually think about only in political or military terms. By experiencing how the implacable resolve of these men to succeed in their mission slowly gave way to troubling doubts about what they were doing, I think we can learn something important about the tragic standoff we find ourselves in today."
Steven, I can't imagine who in the world you believe thinks about the Munich massacre "only in political or military terms." Nor is there any real evidence that the Israeli agents who carried out the retaliatory attacks "gave way to troubling doubts."
One such agent was the Mossad's legendary blonde femme fatale Sylvia Rafael, who took direct part in the most undeniably tragic episode of that mission - the 1974 killing in Lillehammer, Norway, of an innocent Moroccan waiter mistaken for Ali Hassan Salameh, the Black September's operations chief in Europe. Even though Rafael expressed deep regret for that error after she and five others were subsequently caught and jailed in Norway, she went to her grave last year in her native South Africa never having expressed any doubts, public or private (according to her husband, the Norwegian lawyer who represented her in the Lillehammer case), about the overall worth of her mission.
And what is the "tragic standoff" you are referring to? Surely not the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Even though that situation may still be far from a resolution, it is equally far from a "stand-off"; there has been in fact tremendous progress made since 1972, when neither the Israeli nor Palestinian leaderships even recognized each other's right to national self-determination.
What I really suspect, Steven, is that you are using Munich as a means of commenting, in your own way, on the situation of the United States in a post-9/11 reality. But by setting those concerns against the backdrop of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, you will cleverly sidestep having to contend with the kind of overwhelming backlash you would face if your movie made any direct politically charged controversial statements about America's own current war on terror.
For example, I certainly think it unlikely that you would have made a movie about a terror attack against American citizens without first having consulted, or at least taken into account, the concerns of the surviving family members of the victims. Yet that is exactly what you have done with Munich, earning a rebuke on Israeli television from Ilana Romano, whose husband, weightlifter Joseph Romano, was among those slain at the 1972 Munich Olympics.
Perhaps you don't know, Steven, but Ilana Romano has led a struggle for decades to see those victims memorialized by the International Olympics Committee by a proper mention made of the Munich tragedy during the official remarks of the opening ceremony at the quadrennial summer games. Yet the IOC has steadfastly refused that request, citing the anti-Israeli sensibilities of some of its participatory nations (presumably such as Iran, which at the 2004 Athens Olympics deliberately forfeited a scheduled wrestling match rather than have an Iranian athlete compete against an Israeli contender, yet received no penalty from the IOC).
Steven, despite all this, given our long cinematic relationship I'm still willing to go see Munich with an open mind in the hope you prove my concerns wrong, and if not, we will still have Arthur Cohn's superb documentary One Day in September as the definitive film about these events. But frankly, I am already disappointed. Surely the creator of Schindler's List knows that a filmmaker has a responsibility beyond just his directorial duties when he or she decides to tackle a real-life tragedy fresh enough to still have survivors living among us.
I notice, according to several reports, that in preparation for Munich you have retained the services of Allan Mayer, "a crisis PR specialist with Los Angeles-based Sitrick and Company who has advised Spielberg for several years."
Well, I'm no "Hollywood crisis specialist," but for what it's worth, Steven, here's my two cents' worth: Even before your film comes out, you might consider expressing your support for efforts by the survivors of the Munich victims to finally get due recognition from the IOC.
And if not that, at the very least you should pick up the phone and give Ilana Romano the call she, and several others, deserve. I'm sure that bit of advice will sound a little familiar.
The writer, former Jerusalem Post managing editor, is director of The Israel Project's Jerusalem Media Resource Center. www.theisraelproject.org
I'm afraid the minds of liberal Jews are no different than those of other liberals, filled with the incessant chant: "I hate Bush, I hate Bush, I hate Bush..."
Don't forget "United States Bad, United States Bad, United States Bad...."
Spielberg lost my respect with his treatment of AI, a film that was Stanley Kubrick's child until Steven showed up. It was speculated to be a commentary on Judaism - one that Steven didn't agree with.
As a conservative Jew, I can tell you now: liberal Jews are the enemy. The Castro-loving Spielberg is a disgrace. The Christian-bigot Abe Foxman is a despicable cockroach. They hate Israel. They hate America. They seem to hate above all their own Jewishness.
I'm not Jewish, so I suppose that I don't really have a dog in this fight, except as a person who wants history reflected accurately, even in films. I'm just really disappointed because I'm a big fan of Australian actor Eric Bana, who has the starring role in this film. I'm probably not going to be able to see this film, though I've been looking forward to it. It might sour me on all subsequent Bana films, which would be truly regrettable. I'm just get so sick of this same template being played out over and over again. Would it really have been so hard to portray the Israeli commandos as righteous defenders of their country? Is it really impossible for anyone in Hollywood to make a film about the Islam's war against the West without it being an automatic indictment against America. I don't mind liberals having their say; it's just sickening that there is never an alternative viewpoint. It appears that the powers that be in Hollywood are the biggest hypocrites around, beating their breasts about their love for diversity while shutting out any alternative viewpoint.
Something tells me that this is just pre-release hooplah and has nothing to do with the movie. Spielberg is Jewish and is a practicing Jew. He made his wife convert before marrying her. I can't imagine him doing this. I'll wait to see this all for myself.
When folks say that because liberal Jews support Israel that it sort of excuses what they do domestically...I just don;t buy it.
Their votes, and cultural and political influence are not offset by supporting Israel no matter how noble that might be if it were accurate.
And while they may claim to support Israel, they sure don't support destroying Israel's enemies like they ought to.
"Munich" movie Web site, with trailer:
http://www.munichmovie.com
(The story link includes the line: "...the personal toll this mission of revenge takes on the team and the man who led it." Looks like a real downer...)
My wife and I are having an ornaments party at a Jewish home with both Jewish and Christian guests tommorow night (I'm in the South obviously).
I think I'll print your post and read it at dinner if things get too boring.
;>)
ooooh snap! Steven Speilberg, you've been served.
Speilberg should be celebrating how many of those Pali dogs Mossad whacked and extolling the USA to cowboy up against Islaminazis.
I wasn't saying it was an excuse,just that it could be worse. You could have liberal Jews that even hate Israel and I think that is now the case with many of them.
Spielberg's got enough money to survive anything short of a nuclear attack, but he doesn't have enough to buy back the honor and respect he appears about to sacrifice on the altar of political correctness. The foolish aren't usually rich, but the rich are often foolish.
I think many Jews here send money to Israel out of guilt maybe or a sense of obligation...
I think politically that Israel benefits most from the influence of Conservative Jews and Conservative Christians who give both money and political capital to the effort..as well they should.
I don't think liberal American Jews much care for the Likuud or Sharon or Bibi....and they never liked Begin either or Shamir.
Their vision of Israel is the old romantic socialist Ben-Gurion not the rightwing warriors
Starred:
Steven Bauer
Michael York
Rod Steiger
amazon.com/
Or play the "Baptism" episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm. Something hilarious for both crowds.
From the previews that I have seen, the article is pretty accurate... but, that's only from the previews...
This anti-Israeli movie will indeed turn out to be Spielberg's downfall, which is pretty amazing, considering Spielberg told people his (now ex-) wife Amy (Irving) was carrying "the next Messiah" while pregnant with their child.
And let's not forget Henry Waxman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.