Posted on 12/24/2005 8:25:27 PM PST by GodfearingTexan
Please forgive me, but I need some assistance. I had lunch recently with a close family member who insisted that President Bush is leading the most corrupt admin in history. I countered that it wasn't, that in fact Clinton had easily a more corrupt admin and had more people indicted than any other. He replied, no, that was Nixon. I honestly just don't have time to research all of this, and I know that there are people on here that either know the answer off the top of their heads or can tell me exactly where I can look it up.
This being the case, the fuss over Watergate, which made Woodward far wealthier than Nixon ever dreamed of being, was the most lucrative exercize in Stawmanology that any journalist ever pulled off in world history. Worthy of a Barnum & Bailey world! It is no coincidence that the film, The Sting, won the Hollywood Oscar in the same year that Watergate occupied the headlines. When Redford later played the sanctimonious Woodward in another Hollywood effort, All The President's Men, I was surprised that no reviewer of the latter film ever mentioned that Redford's earlier role in The Sting came closer to capturing Woodward's character than did his role in All The President's Men. What I cannot understand is why the Justice Department has not indicted Woodward for having obstructed justice (and contributing to injustice) by shielding the identity of Deep Throat, who was, after all, the 2IC at the FBI and had grievously betrayed his oath to his agency and to his country. There shouldn't be a statute of limitations on treason or of Woodward's faciltation of it. As Ben Stein noted when Deep Throat outed himself, Felt and Woodward bear heavy responsibility for the pointless waste of the lives of 6 million Indochinese (including the 3 million Cambodians whose fate was left to the tender mercies of Pol Pot) when they destroyed a presidency that would have redeemed the enormous loss-of-life by achieving a viable South Korea type democracy in South Vietnam. Thanks for your supporting remarks. Merry Christmas.
They were the founding fathers...
...and it appears they wasted no time in getting down to the real business of politics - searching for partisan advantage, blaming the other guy for everything which goes wrong, and arguing about everything.
That's why I referred to that disagreement on this thread.
Oh please.... the SIL I spoke of knows we love her dearly... but she's learned not to jump into a very lively political discussion... then try to defend Clinton over Bush. She got idealogically "spanked"... but good. They weren't hateful...but tore her points apart. I saw her drowning and pulled her away.....suggesting that she browse the site here and read a few books. We all enjoy lively debates... and if you have to play "PC" and not let your hair down around family.... you sure wouldn't fit in the fold. So.....you keep yours and I'll keep mine. K?*chuckle*
bttt
Excuse me .. I lied ..?? About what ..??
And .. since you just arrived at FR a couple of days ago - I'd say you are here for only one purpose - and that's to stir up trouble. It won't work!
Go take a flying leap back to DU where I'm confident you'll be much happier calling people "liar".
Corrupt. Here are some interesting synonyms: Corrupt people are those believed to be evil, depraved, perverted, debauched, defiled, tainted, stained. They are the type that undermine, impair, damage, abuse, mistreat, dishonor, violate, disgrace, violate, and cause the nation to degenerate. Golly! These all fit Clinton to a T. But so do many of the terms fit LBJ. A few fit Nixon too. Carter gets several after his name. So does JFK, not to mention FDR. Among RATs, it's hard to chose anyone worse.
Clinton's admin is the gift that keeps on giving -- to whit, Sandy Berger's pants-stuffing only a short while ago.
I am still proud that the first President I voted for was Nixon.
I am also proud that my 87 year old Grandmother attempted
to attend his funeral.
[She had to settle for visiting his grave site the next day.]
The link you sent me does not prove anything.
I don't know what point you're trying to make.
And .. since you can't make your point - our conversation is over!
bttt
Well .. I'm sorry to burst your bubble - but I saw the program on the TV myself. Now .. you can continue to say it didn't happen .. but you would be lying.
Get lost!
IMHO, the most dishonest was not this admin but the Clinton ... remind your friend of Hillary and the FBI/IRS files Hillary obtained, how about all the deaths on their watch??? Waco, Ruby Ridge,
Don't cast your pearls before swine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.