Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UAE official hits out at US over ports deal
Financial Times ^ | March 13 2006 | Steve Negus

Posted on 03/13/2006 11:22:42 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4

The United Arab Emirate’s central bank governor lashed out at US opponents of the Dubai Ports World deal, claiming it was wrong to mix politics and business in an unusually pointed statement by an Emirati official.

“What happened is very bad and it is not right to mix up political issues with commercial issues,” said Sultan Bin Nasser al-Suwaidi in remarks carried by the Emirati press on Monday.

“What the US is going goes against the tenets of international trade, which they created in the first place,” he said.

He added that it would affect the view of Arab investors towards the United States in terms of trade and investment.

Although the Emirati press has been vocal on the DPW deal, accusing opponents of xenophobia, officials in the Emirates have until now shied away from direct criticism of the United States, emphasizing that US congressional rejection of the deal would not affect their long-term ties.

Mr Suwaidi however has been an exception to the general conciliatory tone. Last week he said the controversy would have a negative impact on trade negotiations with the United States.

A round of talks aimed at cementing a US-UAE Free Trade Agreement was in fact postponed on Friday, but UAE officials insisted that the delay had nothing to do with the ports controversy.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ports; pots; soreloserman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2006 11:22:45 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Yeah, and it is bad business to finance the construction of Mosques world wide too.


2 posted on 03/13/2006 11:25:32 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
They have to do some of this protesting or they look like P*ssies..the question is will any of it have material effect on trade or security arrangements?
3 posted on 03/13/2006 11:25:55 AM PST by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

I predict it won't.

Dubai only cares about making money. They will continue to trade with the US.


4 posted on 03/13/2006 11:27:54 AM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yeah, and it is bad business to finance the construction of Mosques world wide too.

Why?


5 posted on 03/13/2006 11:28:36 AM PST by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DOGEY

Maybe because it encourages Islam????


6 posted on 03/13/2006 11:31:19 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

At a time when we should be appealling to 'moderate' muslims and giving them a reason to support us against the radicals, this sends the WRONG message.
Sorry, to those who want nativism and protectionism. That boat sailed off with Ross Perot in it. We need to learn how to function in this "global economy". There are no do-overs.


7 posted on 03/13/2006 11:31:53 AM PST by griswold3 (Ken Blackwell, Ohio Governor in 2006- No!! You cannot have my governor in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"Maybe because it encourages Islam????"

Which then can and does encourage/promote terror.

This is not rocket science, folks.


8 posted on 03/13/2006 11:32:51 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

Business and trade is one thing. The WOT and our military presence in the UAE is quite another. Hopefully, this will not effect it.


9 posted on 03/13/2006 11:35:17 AM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What hippocrites, they are saying we shouldn't mix business and politics, this coming froma state owned business....hhhmmmm


10 posted on 03/13/2006 11:43:27 AM PST by AmericanCowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

You've been to Dubai?


11 posted on 03/13/2006 11:54:15 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AmericanCowboy
"What hippocrites, they are saying we shouldn't mix business and politics, this coming froma state owned business....hhhmmmm"

Trying to seperate war from commerce. Doesn't work. Just horse-sense. ;)

12 posted on 03/13/2006 11:54:50 AM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

"You've been to Dubai?"

LOL@ these "been there" posts.

I havent been to the North Pole, but I know it's cold there.


13 posted on 03/13/2006 11:57:25 AM PST by Canedawg (And then?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

I agree with the UAE official. I think the President was right.

I think that Rep. King turned out to be a useful idiot for the Dems, who never did intellectually grasp the deal, but saw a way to hammer Bush from the right.

You want U.S. ports owned by Americans? Then pass a law and make it illegal for any foreign companies to lease terminals within our ports - which is what P&O was selling, btw, leases to operate terminals. The UAE was not going to "own American ports".

This was, IMO, a ridiculous tempest in a teapot. Democrats must be absolutely jubilant that they got away with spinning this deal in a way that both fractures the Republican party and weakens the President.

Feh.


14 posted on 03/13/2006 11:57:33 AM PST by StatenIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
I predict it won't.

Dubai only cares about making money. They will continue to trade with the US.

You think we are the only place they can get what they want?

15 posted on 03/13/2006 11:59:01 AM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon (Justice and "The Law" are not always the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
.the question is will any of it have material effect on trade or security arrangements?

Picture a situation -- say Boieng vs. Airbus -- where all the material elements are equal or equalize out(just for the sake of argument). If I was them, in the past I might have leaned towards the US. Now, if the $$ net the same, I would lean AWAY from the US.

This cowardice, uninformed bias, and stupidity on our part will cost us for a long time.

16 posted on 03/13/2006 12:03:05 PM PST by freedumb2003 (American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg
And never having been there, would argue with somebody who has over Inuit politics and the price of pelts in Prudhoe Bay, based on your readings of National Geographic.

Your credibility is a mostly a figment of your imagination.

There is no requirement here on FR that you actually have any real knowledge before you pontificate.

Neither is there any requirement for anybody to take you seriously.

17 posted on 03/13/2006 12:09:13 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

They will continue to dock our military ships as well. Without us, they are vulnerable to the wrath of the Islamofascists all around them.


18 posted on 03/13/2006 12:11:21 PM PST by Sender (As water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions. Be without form. -Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jdm

"Maybe because it encourages Islam????"

Which then can and does encourage/promote terror.

This is not rocket science, folks.

No, it's not rocket science. Bigotry is the more accepted term.


19 posted on 03/13/2006 12:12:58 PM PST by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland
Dubai Ports: Who was Right, the President or Congress?
20 posted on 03/13/2006 12:15:21 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson