Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Election turnout looking paltry-Activist fatigue,voter disenchantment cited as possible reasons
Sac Bee ^ | 6/3/06 | Laura Mecoy

Posted on 06/03/2006 3:10:39 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

MANHATTAN BEACH -- Trying to fire up a lackluster crowd at a "get out the vote" rally, City Councilman Jim Aldinger asked who would be working over the weekend to get Californians to the polls on Tuesday.

Only a handful of the 80 activists raised their hands at the rally Thursday for gubernatorial candidate Phil Angelides.

Campaign consultants reported similarly tepid responses from volunteers around the state -- even though an expected low voter turnout and an extremely tight gubernatorial primary could make this year's "get out the vote" efforts more decisive than in past statewide campaigns.

Secretary of State Bruce McPherson said Friday he expects 38 percent of registered voters to cast ballots in Tuesday's primary election. That amounts to about one in four of all Californians eligible to vote.

That would place Tuesday's turnout among the lowest ever for a California gubernatorial primary in a year when the polls indicate this could be one of the state's closest-ever gubernatorial primaries.

"The winner will be the person who has the organization to turn out the vote," said Democratic adviser Kam Kuwata.

--snip--

He said the low voter turnout should give Angelides the edge over state Controller Steve Westly because the Democratic Party and organized labor ...

--snip--

With the special election last year and the 2003 gubernatorial recall, California has had at least one statewide election in each of the past four years.

"The activists are kind of burned out from election to election to election campaign activity," said California Labor Federation Political Director Bryan Blum. "There is only so much time they can devote year after year for elections."

The federation still plans a final flurry of "get out the vote" activities, with precinct walks and phone banks scheduled from Sacramento to San Diego.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: activist; angelides; cademprimary; california; cited; disenchantment; election; elections; fatigue; looking; paltry; reasons; turnout; voter; voterturnout; westly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: Torie; calcowgirl
"You voted for McClintock for two offices?"

Seemed logical to me. Tom is fit to hold either office while Arnold is fit to hold neither.

And who will you be voting for as governor?

21 posted on 06/03/2006 6:26:24 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Arnold if his opponent is Angelides, and if Westly, leaning Arnold, but only leaning. I voted for Davis, against the jerk Simon. I have crossed the River Styx before, and am perfectly capable of doing it again, as long as it is not for a US Senate race. For that office, which has the power of confirmation of judicial appointments, crossing the River Styx is a bridge too far.


22 posted on 06/03/2006 6:31:43 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Do you suppose that Pill Angelides could be depended upon to veto the faggotization of our children?

As far as bills sent to the Governor in 2007 and beyond, NONE of the three can be relied upon to stand up against the rump ranger agenda.

23 posted on 06/03/2006 6:46:05 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I voted for Davis, against the jerk Simon.

Congratulations *ssh*le. You got what you wanted, a state in ruins.

24 posted on 06/03/2006 6:48:16 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"Arnold if his opponent is Angelides, and if Westly, leaning Arnold, but only leaning."

This answer is for the general in November.

My question relates to the primary. Are you voting for Arnold on Tuesday?

25 posted on 06/03/2006 6:50:19 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Just defeating the Meathead Initiative is reason enough to vote.

I gotta sick feeling this is gonna get through, but I'm going to make sure it isn't by my 1 vote.

26 posted on 06/03/2006 6:51:44 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Ya that is what I want. Of course. To ruin my state. That is why I own so much real estate in the state. Get a grip. By the way, looking back, would Davis have been a better bet than Arnold? Interesting question, no?


27 posted on 06/03/2006 6:52:03 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Czar

I did by mail about a week ago.


28 posted on 06/03/2006 6:52:48 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It'll be fun to see the outcome of the slime fest between Philth Angelides and Steve Weasely. I'm pulling for Philth cause I think he would be the easiest for Arnold to beat.
29 posted on 06/03/2006 6:53:58 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
" NONE of the three can be relied upon to stand up against the rump ranger agenda."

I know someone who knows Arnold in a real up-close, personal way, and he says that Arnold really is 'homophobic.' Meaning he is appalled and grossed-out by them from his weight lifting days.

30 posted on 06/03/2006 6:56:57 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Torie

I know Bill Simon - he's no jerk...just not a "politician."


31 posted on 06/03/2006 7:03:56 PM PDT by NordP (GWB/Reagan Republican --- JACK BAUER PATRIOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All
Republicans - read this and remember this is our Party philosophy.

Democrats - read this and wonder if this isn't what you believe, and you just might not be as Democrat as you thought...

WE ARE REPUBLICANS BECAUSE…

We believe that our government’s most solemn duty is to keep its citizens safe.

We believe a vibrant entrepreneurial spirit will keep our economy strong and provide more opportunities for workers and families.

We believe that free enterprise and the encouragement of individual initiative and incentive have given this nation an economic system second to none.

We believe in building an innovative economy to compete in the world, because America can compete with anyone, anywhere, thanks to our entrepreneurs and risk-takers who keep us on the cutting edge of technology and commerce.

We believe in strengthening our communities, because our children deserve to grow up in an America in which all their hopes and dreams can come true.

We believe in protecting our families, and respect the family’s role as a touchstone of stability and strength in an ever changing world.

We choose strength over uncertainty, results over rhetoric, optimism over pessimism, opportunity over dependence, freedom over fear, and moving forward over turning back!

32 posted on 06/03/2006 7:06:47 PM PDT by NordP (GWB/Reagan Republican --- JACK BAUER PATRIOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NordP

You are certainly are entitled to your opinion. I just don't share it, for some reasons in the public domain, and some not, and those not I won't share. Those in the public domain were more than sufficient in my opinion, but that is just my opinion.


33 posted on 06/03/2006 7:08:16 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Ya that is what I want. Of course. To ruin my state. That is why I own so much real estate in the state. Get a grip. By the way, looking back, would Davis have been a better bet than Arnold? Interesting question, no?

I think neither would have been any different. Bill Simon would have appointed REPUBLICANS, as staff, agency heads, and judges. He would have signed budgets that LOWERED taxes and he would have put up special election initiatives that DID SOMETHING.

If you couldn't see that and instead swallowed Davis's $60 million in false character assassination, then you ARE the problem in California. We all knew what Davis was going into that election and he more than proved himself. If you voted for him, then that's what you wanted.

34 posted on 06/03/2006 7:12:01 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

bump


35 posted on 06/03/2006 7:13:52 PM PDT by Pelham (McGuestWorkerProgram- Soon to serve over 1 billion Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Ya that is what I want. Of course. To ruin my state.

Of course, if you were a True Conservative™, you would realize that losing the election is winning because then the state will be destroyed and then people will really get it and elect a Real Conservative™ to office and all of us will cheer until he does something we don't like, in which case he was nothing more than a RINO® to begin with.

36 posted on 06/03/2006 7:17:11 PM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Thanks for that. Math professors do have some value added, when their logical abilities just accidently spill out beyond their ken. Who knew?


37 posted on 06/03/2006 7:19:30 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
He would have signed budgets that LOWERED taxes

That is just so funny. The kook legislature would have had a Simonite epiphany and slashed spending to accommodate the lowering of taxes. How could I have missed it!

38 posted on 06/03/2006 7:23:18 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NordP

Bill Simon is, like, so four years ago.


39 posted on 06/03/2006 7:33:30 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Good point! Arnold does NOT support the gay educational agenda, FGS.


40 posted on 06/03/2006 7:54:39 PM PDT by b9 ("the [evil Marxist liberal socialist Democrat Party] alternative is unthinkable" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson