Posted on 06/16/2006 9:13:55 AM PDT by Pyro7480
HPV Vaccine—Another Deception of the Culture of Death
The big news recently is that the FDA has just approved a new vaccine supposedly to inoculate women against cervical cancer. Predictably, the media and health professionals are touting this as the greatest thing since the Salk vaccine, but they are also engaging in a propaganda campaign aimed at distorting the public’s perception of it. I for one will stand against what I consider this newest marriage of the culture of death with junk science, and I believe we all should. In the next few weeks I intend to examine a number of aspects of this Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine for the benefit of parents who may some day be coerced into getting their kids vaccinated with it.
Let me start by pointing out a few basic elements of this vaccine and its service as a tool of the culture of death. First of all, did you ever wonder why all of a sudden we need a vaccine for just one sexually transmitted disease? Just to give you a little perspective: in the nineteen sixties, before the advent of the birth control pill and other forms of abortion-causing drugs, there were only three sexually transmitted diseases which at that time were known as venereal diseases, a name derived from Venus, the pagan goddess of sexual promiscuity. Because of the exponential increase in illicit sexual activity in the past four decades, the number of distinct sexually transmitted diseases has risen to over thirty, not to mention the multiple strains of the distinct diseases. The Human Papilloma Virus, for example, is just one sexually transmitted disease, but it has over 100 different strains! Only a small number of these strains actually lead to cancer and most of its victims don’t know they have it and cure themselves over time.
Now, to put it into even clearer perspective: the much-touted HPV vaccine treats only two strains of HPV and two strains of genital warts. This is a tour-de-force against HPV isn’t it?
The most wretched hypocrisy of the promoters of this vaccine, however, is that, rather than calling it a vaccine against a couple strains of one of the dozens of sexually transmitted diseases, they are calling it a vaccine against cervical cancer. Well, it will certainly protect some women from cervical cancer in the future but that’s not the point. The point is that there are overwhelming numbers of diseases, strains and even cancers that this vaccine does not protect from, all of which are gotten by the very same sexual act. Thinking that this vaccine gives blanket protection against cervical cancer (which of course is how it’s perceived because that is how it’s being promoted) is like believing that thirty people jumping out of the same airplane will all be protected because one of them is wearing a parachute.
This HPV vaccine, my friends, is a classic case of the culture of death playing fast and loose with people’s lives. They use junk science to hook our terribly un-reflective culture on a promise that will benefit only a miniscule portion of the population, and then the false perception of security surrounding their newest ruse hooks everyone else into behaviors and lifestyles that perpetuate the damage and decay our decency.
Don’t fall for it because pretty soon they will be forcing you—and your kids—to drink their potions to the dregs.
Perhaps you're right. People who have casual sex do tend to also be self-destructive, so they weren't holding back because of HPV to begin with.
Count me in...
The sub title should read something like "The sluts deserve to DIE!" ....
Culture of Death? Yeah, and my 89 year old great Aunt Gertrude was a natural redhead too!
He can't have either in principle...
Maybe explains his position...
Why should you be allowed put other people's children at risk?
Some school districts require vacccination against hepatitis which is most often sexually transmitted.
Awesome point!
Some vaccines take time to become effective.
___________________
Really?? Which ones -
These are later... You get them in your teens I believe...
You heard wrong... it's not being touted as a cure, it's being touted as a preventative. I don't see how preventing a disease results in people's deaths.
I would argue that it's you who is the menace to society, not the good Father who is sounding the warning.
He's a menace because he's sounding an ill-informed warning.
Hun,
We call them KD's...
Short for Knuckle Draggers....
Wanna start a ping list?
(and if somebody thinks that teens will stop to have sex because they haven't been vaccinated, then he/she should have their head examined... )
Talk about junk science:
"....before the advent of the birth control pill and other forms of abortion-causing drugs, there were only three sexually transmitted diseases which at that time were known as venereal diseases, a name derived from Venus, the pagan goddess of sexual promiscuity. Because of the exponential increase in illicit sexual activity in the past four decades, the number of distinct sexually transmitted diseases has risen to over thirty, not to mention the multiple strains of the distinct diseases."
There is not now more sexually transmitted diseases than there was before. There is now better science and medical diagnosis that can identify more diseases and different strains of different diseases than was IDENTIFIED in the past - IDENTIFIED, not CREATED (other than HIV possibly).
As for the science of this new drug, it is my understanding that while this new treatment does nothing for some strains of HPV, it is effective on a few of the most frequently found strains of HPV. So, when is a drug more "effective" than less, when it treats a majority of strains of a disease or a majority of the occurances of a disease?
Again, as to the science, there is plenty of evidence that women who contract some strains of HPV (1)hardley ever know they have it for a very long time (many years) and (2)although they remain without identifiable symptoms, (3)it does appear that in time HPV infected cervical cells degenerate in their DNA reproduction and begin the process of creating cervical cancer.
The positive point of the drug is (1)neither the man or the woman, niether the carrier or the recipient have any awareness (symptoms, affects) from the HPV virus, and (2)not knowing, due to lack of symptoms, that any thing is amiss, the woman goes for years before, until (3)HPV eventually demonstrates a problem it has created. So, it's a bad thing to try to prevent this?
Particularly, when it remains almost totally asypmtomatic in men (carriers only apparently, totally unaware they have it) and remains unnoticed for many years in a woman until pre-cancerous conditions develope?
The Hep vaccines require three shots over a period of time to be 100%.
I don't follow this guy's reasoning no this. It's a good thing too, he seems to be a flaming idiot.
Ooooh,
You're so bad (true) but bad :)
Some school districts require vacccination against hepatitis which is most often sexually transmitted.
______________________________
Guess what? The hospitals give this before a newborn is less than 24 hours old. Why? It's not really for the well being of the child and if the mother is not at risk (and they can do blood tests while pregnant) there is no reason to do so. (I'm not sold on it if there are risks, but that's a separate conversation.
{I'll answer my own why - the almighty dollar - which I'm all for companies, doctors, hospitals, etc to make - but not at the expense of my child.)
All of them...
This is why you have three shots for polio and a booster one year later later on... This is why you need two measles shots to get full effectiveness... This is why you need three shots of Engerix (the hepatitis vaccine) to get protection...
Do you really have so little knowledge of how vaccines work?
informative vaccine site:
www.nvic.org
Yeah *most* of us survived. If only 1 in a 100, or 1 in a 1000, died, you couldn't call it "routine" - just part of life's rich tapestry.
ecause of it children are needlessly dying because of junk science on one hand, and from this thread religious nonsense from others...
_______________
You're ranting - what children are dying? From what diseases?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.