Posted on 07/06/2006 1:40:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
Embedded in the heart of a supernova remnant 10,000 light-years away is a stellar object the likes of which astronomers have never seen before in our galaxy.
At first glance, the object looks like a densely packed stellar corpse known as a neutron star surrounded by a bubble of ejected stellar material, exactly what would be expected in the wake of a supernova explosion.
However, a closer 24.5-hour examination with the European Space Agency's XMM Newton X-ray satellite reveals that the energetic X-ray emissions of the blue, point-like object cycles every 6.7 hours-tens of thousands of times longer than expected for a freshly created neutron star.
It is behavior that's more commonly seen in neutron stars that have been around for several million years, researchers say.
"The behavior we see is especially puzzling in view of its young age, less than 2,000 years," said study leader Andrea De Luca of the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) in Milan. "For years we have had a sense that the object is different, but we never knew how different until now," De Luca said.
The finding is detailed in the July 7 issue of the journal Science.
Novel stage?
Called 1E161348-5055, or 1E for short, the object is embedded almost in the exact center of RCW103, a supernova remnant located 10,000 light-years away in the constellation Norma. Astronomers think that 1E and RCW103 were both born in the same catastrophic event.
Like other neutron stars, which form when a star at least eight times more massive than the Sun runs out of fuel and explodes as a supernova, 1E is estimated to be only about 12.5 miles (20 km) across.
One explanation for the neutron star's strange behavior is that it might be a magnetar, an exotic subclass of highly magnetized neutron stars. Of the dozen or so magnetars that are known, however, most usually spin several times per minute-much faster than 1E.
This explanation might still work, however, if the magnetar is surrounded by a debris disk that is helping to slow down the neutron star's spin. This scenario has never been observed before and would mark the discovery of a novel stage in neutron star evolution if confirmed.
One or two?
Another explanation, scientists say, is that 1E is part of a binary system with a normal, low-mass star with only half the mass, or less, of our Sun.
Such X-ray binary systems are known, but they usually involve systems that are millions of times older than 1E.
Despite the many speculations, the short answer is that scientists simply don't yet know how to explain 1E's strange behavior.
"RCW103 is an enigma," said study team member Giovanni Bignami, director of the Centre d'Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements (CESR) in France. "When we do figure this out, we're going to learn a lot more about supernovae, neutron stars and their evolution."
I thought this was gonna be about Tommy Lee's new band, SuperNova.
ping
Sorry guys, this is, as the article states, an anomaly. There are many others that do not behave this way....they behave as expected. This ONE, however, is different.
Could be, right? I mean what F--- do these guys know?
God I love Sci-Fi.
LOL.. I saw that Norma thing too.. Vey suspicious. ;-)
We all knew it had to be somewhere other than in his head.
"There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, Horatio."
The theory is that the start off real fast, as I am sure you understand, and then slow down.
The extension of that is that when young, they are fast, which we see is not true for all cases, all ages. Age is a guess only, as size.
They could start off slow, build up, then way later slow down.
And I read the next post and I'll go give him credit for the answer why.
Darn. Beat me to it. You may fool others but you don't fool me.
Very simple, well-known visual everyone gets.
The child is in it's pre-accretion stage. The force of it's darkness (Neutron Star) pulls in more and more matter from the circling debris field, and grows, and gets fuel from this growing matter which increases the energy, thus the speed.
Beyond a certain growth point, (size, energy, density) entropy takes back over.
...or what you said.
Just like Al Gore.
I don't know. Those guys that do CSI are smart. They are scientists . . . |
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.