Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call for fertility ban for obese
BBC ^ | August 30

Posted on 08/30/2006 12:17:45 PM PDT by Bushwacker777

"The British Fertility Society is recommending women with a body mass index of 36 and over should not be allowed access to fertility treatment.

Underweight women and those classed just as obese (BMI over 29) should be forced to address their weight before starting treatment, the society said. "

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bioethics; bodymassindex; eugenics; homosexualagenda; infertilitybritain; junkscience; meisterrace; nannystate; neonazis; obesity; pseudoscience; socializedmedicine; survivalofthefattest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: sandbar

He said Prempro and other Rx hormones have additives that are not in bioidenticals. I've noticed that I have more energy and sleep better at night.

As for the protein shakes, I've been told [most recently at Curves] that you have to take in enough for your body to have something to burn regularly or it will actually store more fat when you drastically cut your intake. Or, maybe you just don't have much to lose. The last few pounds are the hardest most of the time.


81 posted on 08/30/2006 1:33:08 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Bushwacker777
What is the definition of obese? Are these two obese?

I've heard that many athletes are considered obese based on some sort of formula. Maybe I'm obese and don't know it. I wioll say I'm not as fat as these two.


82 posted on 08/30/2006 1:35:38 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

OMG - Is That Her BELLY?!!!


83 posted on 08/30/2006 1:37:36 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: elc

Uhm, go read the first line of the article again, homey.


84 posted on 08/30/2006 1:38:26 PM PDT by Toby06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Who's next on the liberal hit list?

I think this one should no longer produce children.

Oh wait. She just recently took care of that concern.

85 posted on 08/30/2006 1:38:54 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zek157
BMI of 31 is serious fatass and unhealthy.

BMI is a recording studio. hat does that have to do with fat folks?

86 posted on 08/30/2006 1:40:32 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

I'd like to think that the second picture (the Code Pinko) is a photoshop job.


87 posted on 08/30/2006 1:41:03 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

I would agree about the portion control issues with the carb diets.


88 posted on 08/30/2006 1:42:23 PM PDT by cyborg (No I don't miss the single life at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: sandbar

The medical literature has not established whether PCOS often causes obesity or vice versa, and it appears that there's some of both going on. What is known is that only about half of women with PCOS are even overweight, so it's clearly not a direct relationship. And in obese women, the PCOS symptoms including fertility problems improve with weight loss; for normal weight women, pharmaceutical intervention is the only thing that helps.

What's very clear, though, is that obesity with or without PCOS is strongly correlated with poor outcomes for IVF and other fertility treatments, so it's not unreasonable to limit access to expensive taxpayer-funded treatments when they're unlikely to be effective. Obesity is also strongly correlated with serious pregnancy complications, often with great harm to the fetus, so there's a good argument to be made for a policy of not encouraging artificial fertility treatments to bypass a natural mechanism which tends to shut down fertility in women for whom it would be dangerous.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=12080440

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16790100&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16816057&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum

It is well-known that once obesity is established, regardless of the cause, it results in permanent changes to body chemistry that make losing weight extremely difficult, as you have the misfortune to discover first-hand. I'm sure researchers will eventually figure out how to reverse that effect, but in the meantime, despite my government-shrinking urges, I think it's urgently important to mount a huge campaign against childhood overweight and obesity. It makes me livid to see parents buying candy bars and huge non-diet sodas for their already severely overweight children. The children are too young to know any better, but will be permanently saddled with the problem their parents inflicted on them (and given our increasingly socialist society, all of us get socked with the increased medical bills). A free society needs to emphasize personal responsibility, but how can you hold someone responsible for something which was taken out of their control during childhood by their parents?

There seems to be a widespread notion that some people are just more susceptible to gaining excess weight easily (no doubt true, though it only explains a fraction of the current obesity problem), and that therefore there is no point in aggressively attacking the problem in those people before their weight gets out of control, which is usually in childhood/adolescence (dangerously false). IMO an 8 year old who is 15% above his/her ideal weight should be treated as a medical emergency -- the severest consequences won't appear for many more years, but the opportunity to treat the condition and prevent those consequences is already quickly slipping away at that point.


89 posted on 08/30/2006 1:42:39 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

And I went to Weight Watchers so I know the palm of the hand rule for main course helpings. Still, when I can't have the starch - which I don't miss very much - I'm apt to double up on the protein, especially baked whitefish.


90 posted on 08/30/2006 1:44:46 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse

Consuming Diet Coke should be illegal. I have yet to see a thin person consume Diet Coke. Only fat folks drink Diet Coke. Therefore, Diet Coke makes you fat.


91 posted on 08/30/2006 1:45:54 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: elc
...and those classed just as obese (BMI over 29) should be forced to address their weight before starting treatmeny.

I've seen folks so big they have their own area code.

92 posted on 08/30/2006 1:47:50 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
So, are they also suggesting that Obese people report to the camps soon?

This is one more example of how the nanny state is going to force us to do things "for our own good".

93 posted on 08/30/2006 1:49:14 PM PDT by Volunteer (Just so you know, I am ashamed the Dixie Chicks make records in Nashville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

aint it the truth.


94 posted on 08/30/2006 1:49:59 PM PDT by kinghorse (I calls them like I sees them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

The protein will help with the apetite that's for sure.


95 posted on 08/30/2006 1:52:03 PM PDT by cyborg (No I don't miss the single life at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: zek157
yep Height: 5 feet, 4 inches Weight: 210 pounds Your BMI is 36, indicating your weight is in the obese category for adults of your height.

What is the formula? Who said that this is the panacea for measuring obesity?

96 posted on 08/30/2006 1:56:54 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Volunteer; Bushwacker777

I agree that this is one of the dumber things I have seen in a while. However, Bushwacker777 posted it, not me.


97 posted on 08/30/2006 1:58:14 PM PDT by RebelBanker (If you can't do something smart, do something right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: doc30
The original post is correct: 5'4" and 170 lbs gives a BMI of 29.2. The equation uses hieght^2 not height^3.

doc30 are you an MD? Can you give me any valid scientific reason for the value for the height measurement to be squared rather than cubed?

98 posted on 08/30/2006 1:59:49 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker

Sorry brother. I messed up in my posting.


99 posted on 08/30/2006 2:03:24 PM PDT by Volunteer (Just so you know, I am ashamed the Dixie Chicks make records in Nashville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
I'd like to think that the second picture (the Code Pinko) is a photoshop job.

LOL. So that makes Teddy's pic legit?


100 posted on 08/30/2006 2:59:55 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson