Skip to comments.
PRESIDENTIAL OBSERVATIONS BY THE SECRET SERVICE
NA
| NA
| Dave Kulow
Posted on 10/04/2006 8:59:53 AM PDT by dvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-227 next last
To: DollyCali
181
posted on
10/04/2006 12:04:55 PM PDT
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: dvan
I wonder what the SS guys thought about their posting for the fake J. F'in Kerry???
182
posted on
10/04/2006 12:10:17 PM PDT
by
aShepard
(Maybe the UN should donate UNICEF proceeds to the Gates Foundation, and fold!)
To: wagglebee
We know there is some truth to some of it though because the public has witnessed it.
To: JamesP81
To: CindyDawg
I don't doubt for a second that most if not all of it is true. My guess is that a lot of it comes from White House staffers and not Secret Service agents.
185
posted on
10/04/2006 12:15:26 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: snugs
My understanding (and this is from memory) is that what he is doing with his fingers is a symbol of some sort indicating "danger" or he is being "coerced" or something along those lines.
186
posted on
10/04/2006 12:16:47 PM PDT
by
Wyatt's Torch
(I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
To: wagglebee
it still concerns me to hear of Secret Service agents gossiping this way. I don't see where an agent talking to a friend about what kind of person a President, Vice Pres., their spouse is has anything to do with security. I've provide security (not on the scale of the Secret Service though, that I really didn't like but still did my job to the max. It's the same with the SS agents they do their job regardless. So get off of it will you!
To: wagglebee
it still concerns me to hear of Secret Service agents gossiping this way. I don't see where an agent talking to a friend about what kind of person a President, Vice Pres., their spouse is has anything to do with security. I've provide security (not on the scale of the Secret Service though, that I really didn't like but still did my job to the max. It's the same with the SS agents they do their job regardless. So get off of it will you!
To: snugs
Here's the link to the story on the meaning of the fingers crossed:
Link
189
posted on
10/04/2006 12:20:30 PM PDT
by
Wyatt's Torch
(I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
To: jerry639
So you don't think it's necessary for the protectees to be secure that their actions and conversations will be held in confidence by those protecting them?
190
posted on
10/04/2006 12:23:54 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: dvan
and nobody trusted him [Bubba Clinton]. Says it all.
191
posted on
10/04/2006 12:25:17 PM PDT
by
GretchenM
(What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
To: wagglebee
So you don't think it's necessary for the protectees to be secure that their actions and conversations will be held in confidence by those protecting them? First you appeared to be stating that you thought it was a security risk to them. Now you want to talk about their conversations and actions should remain secure.
I really don't think Pres. Bush or Laura will mind what the SS Agents have to say about them. If the Clintons want to act like spoiled, uppity little children and treat the agents like dirt then as far as I am concerned the deserve what they get.
Nope, I don't have a problem with it at all.
To: Rb ver. 2.0
I doubt he listens to that kind of music, although that's one of my favorite bands.
193
posted on
10/04/2006 1:26:04 PM PDT
by
JamesP81
(The answer always lies with more freedom; not less)
To: madison10
To: dvan
195
posted on
10/04/2006 1:35:21 PM PDT
by
chemicalman
(Doing my part to maintain global warming.)
To: snugs
196
posted on
10/04/2006 1:51:26 PM PDT
by
Irish Rose
(Will work for chocolate.)
To: dvan
To: dvan
It was crystal clear that the Clinton's neither liked nor respected each other, and this was true long before the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Theirs was genuinely a "marriage of convenience." Anyone who read "The Truth About Hillary" knows this was the case from nearly the beginning.
198
posted on
10/04/2006 2:05:06 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: Recovering_Democrat; cardinal4
During the rehab of the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Havana in the mid-1990s, there was a revolving team of State Department Seabees on 90- and 179-day TDY trips. One good friend of mine had been at the Pentagon and was often tapped for duty at Camp David. He said that during 41's term as president there was a real scramble among troops in the DC area to pull some weekend duty at Camp David then. He said that when X42's crowd pulled in, the permanent staff at Camp David had to assign people there; there were no more volunteers.
199
posted on
10/04/2006 2:43:38 PM PDT
by
Ax
(Cheer, cheer, for Old Notre Dame.)
To: Jeff Head
I couldn't disagree with you more. There are plenty of articles, and biographies about current and former presidents extant.
Are you arguing that there should be an absolute moratorium against writing anything about a president during his life?
On the other hand; Al Quaeda could be salting Clinton's intern pool...
200
posted on
10/04/2006 2:50:30 PM PDT
by
robertc5
(Erm)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-227 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson