Skip to comments.Reynolds (R) down 5 points in NY-26 (Survey USA poll)
Posted on 10/05/2006 4:22:08 PM PDT by okstate
Reynolds (R) 45%
Davis (D) 50%
482 Likely Voters, MOE +/- 4.6%
Reynolds down 5 says Survey USA
A coup against the government of the United States funded by George Soros.
I think there will be atleast a five point recoving in this once anything calms down.
It's temporary, and it's going to all blow up it the dem-wits faces.
All R's in all of the blue states will always have struggles no matter what year and what situations "pop up" (pun intended).
just wait until tomorrow 3pm....that's when they'll drop the next bomb
What kind of NRCC chair puts HIS OWN seat in danger by his stupidity???
Passing the misleading Novak line I see.
Reynolds only knew about the innocuous e-mails, not the lurid IM's, but you are pushing the hack Novak(who let Scooter Libby twist in the wind for 3 years) line.
Reynold's will win despite you and robert novak.
To be perfectly frank about it, with a MOE of +/- 4.6%, this is a statistical tie from which no conclusions should be drawn.
JohnnyZ - Drive-by-media shill
DANE Passing the misleading Novak line I see. Reynolds only knew about the innocuous e-mails
So what did I say that was misleading?
Oh, right, nothing.
Except you think there's nothing strange about a 52-year-old gay man sending "overly friendly" overtures to a 16-year-old boy that the boy considers "sick" and that the family complains about to their Congressman.
I would conclude that Reynolds' seat is in danger.
He may well still win, but it is gross imcompetence for the NRCC chair to put his own seat in danger by his stupidity when he's supposed to be focused on helping GOP campaigns across the country.
And the family complained and the e-mails stopped and the family did not want any further investigation and those e-mails were innocuous and not explicit.
It was much later when the explicit and lurid IM's came out and foley was booted, but you already knew that, but still decide to muddy the waters with your misinformation(ala bob novak).
This poll showing that Reynold's is in a virtual tie is actually a good sign, given the the 24/7 coverage of foley.
I guess you all are very saddened in the DNC basement.
Don't be so sure. The MSM and RAT candidates are going to ignore any further developments and lie and libel left and right from here on out. They will worry about any residual lawsuits on that after they win. This remains big trouble and we will have to fight like hell to spread the word to America.
His committee was the largest recipient of Foley $$$.
You know the commercials are going to repeat that over and over and over.
Please give us the party affiliated sample next time. And was this a flash poll?
Reynolds has created a number of House seats that are gimmies for the RATS (Pa-10, FL-16, TX-22). It is fitting that he created his own seat to be a gimmie.
His committee had their money RETURNED by foley
How is Tom DeLay Reynold's fault?
I'll admit that the whole Ronnie Earle saga was a witch hunt. Although Arbamnoff was another matter. Notice, since Delay moved to Va, there is no news from Earle.
Delay retired after the primaries were done. If he was going to retire in the 1st place, then he should have not run at all and let the RAT donors waste their money on Nick Lampson. Instead, we are unable to find a replace candidate on the ballot. We are stuck with a write-in candidate with a complicated name, Shelley Sekula-Gibbs. Reynolds could have encouraged Delay along with Ney and Sherwood to retire and let another up and coming conservatives to take their places.
And don't forget, Reynolds persuaded Mark Foley to run again. And that appalling press conference he held a couple of days ago.
Having Reynolds lose and bringing in Negron is a great start for GOP House cleaning.
Yes, it would. And there needs to be some House-cleaning. While I salute Dennis Hastert's past achievements, he should step down as Speaker after the election.
Reynolds should have tried to get Tom DeLay to retire. If he had, maybe the GOP wouldn't be in the mess it's in right now in TX District 22.
If the election turns bad for the GOP, not only will Hasstert be gone, but Boehner will go as well. And quite frankly, I don't think Blunt will move into a higher leadership position either.
Bill Paxon was Reynolds's predecessor. Any chance we can get him back again ? :-/
"Bill Paxon was Reynolds's predecessor. Any chance we can get him back again ? :-/"
Bring back Tom Davis. He is the Karl Rove of Congress. Also, if returned to this position, maybe he won't run for the U.S. Senate when John Warner retires.
Survey USA is a FAKE Polling firm.
Reynolds is up 15 points in REAL local polling in New York.
Greenberg Quinlan Rosner (D) has Davis up 8 over Reynolds today.
Agreed, the presser was stupidly executed and he looked horrible. That said, Reynolds has been an outstanding NRCC chair and we need to carry him over the finish line.
Down by only five at this point means he will win.
The fact that it's a partisan firm means it should be taken with a grain of salt.