Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passionate America Threatened by Jordan Edmund's Attorney - Foleygate (Legal Advice Requested)
Macsmind ^ | 10-06-06 | Wild BMacranger

Posted on 10/06/2006 2:06:53 PM PDT by jrooney

Wild Bill at Passionate America that discovered the name of the former page that received the sexual IMs from Foley has received an email from Jordan Edmunds attorney, Stephen Jones, demanding he pull the story. Wild Bill is looking for advice from any leagal eagles out there.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: foley; foleygate; jordanedmund; macsmind; passionateamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-169 next last
To: jrooney

"...has received an email from Jordan Edmunds..."

I receive junk email all the time that I never even open. I just delete it. ;)


61 posted on 10/06/2006 2:57:16 PM PDT by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Naziism was in 1937.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danette

"Without any foundation or legal permission, you are stating that our client is the person associated with the Ims.

you cease any further efforts to identify our client with these alleged Ims and cease publishing such information on Passionate America."

___________________________________________________________

LOL. Ya think they're going to say this Jordan isn't the author of the IM's as a defense?

Someone needs to get a screen shot of all the stuff and put it here. I wonder who'll they'll go after here at Freerepublic to take down the information? I bet JR will tell him to pound sound.


62 posted on 10/06/2006 2:57:34 PM PDT by Danette ("If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Izzy!

Where ya been?


63 posted on 10/06/2006 2:57:55 PM PDT by HonestConservative (Xenophobe with hair on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Please forward the email to the rest of us! I would really like to respond... ;)


64 posted on 10/06/2006 2:58:21 PM PDT by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Naziism was in 1937.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marak

heh....you should see the email I just sent Jonesy...I threatened to sue him acting pro se and bury his ass in paper for the next 18 months.....god,I love this


65 posted on 10/06/2006 2:59:21 PM PDT by Armigerous ( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Armigerous

No headers?


66 posted on 10/06/2006 3:01:44 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Agree with your advice about the value of internet legal advice, but I do have one suggestion: he should ask Jones to provide the legal basis for his demand that he pull truthful information from a web site that is devoted to posting news and information. Make Jones explain his theory for the demand.


67 posted on 10/06/2006 3:02:14 PM PDT by Defiant (Do you realize if the Star Wars creator's last name was Thomas, we would have Tom Skywalker?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Armigerous

There is absolutely no way that this e-mail was written by an attorney, running off on a weird, subjective muddle about "mistakes" and "errors" by ABC as it does.


68 posted on 10/06/2006 3:08:17 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Danette
I now see the letter. This is a very weak letter because the lawyer fails to specify what is false on the website, and he fails to specify what statute or law requires removal of the information or photo. Some states have laws protecting the likeness or photo of a person, making it a civil violation to publish such without permission. But, my guess is that this guy is now or soon will be considered a public figure as understood in Times vs. Sullivan, making any claim for damages very, very hard to prove. If Sullivan applies, then this fellow would have to prove malice. I see no malice here. Just good digging. ABC blew the cover by providing the screen name. You simply converted that to the person. And this person is at the heart of the biggest public scandal in a month or more.
69 posted on 10/06/2006 3:08:47 PM PDT by Binkmeister (A little knowledge is a dangerous thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Armigerous
I'm not a lawyer, but this sounds like the kind of letter that a lawyer might send if he didn't think/wasn't sure he had a real case, but thinks (or the client thinks) a letter from a lawyer might be intimidating enough to get results.

I don't know that a cease-and-desist letter has any real legal significance anyway, except that if the lawyer goes ahead with a lawsuit or asks for an injunction, it looks better if he can say he tried this first. The law on it might vary from state to state, though.

(I know that in MA, to sue under the Consumer Protection Act, your supposed to send a demand letter citing the statute -- and wait I forget how long for a response -- before filing suit, but I know of a couple of cases where the demand letter was never sent and the trial went on.)

70 posted on 10/06/2006 3:13:55 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 3niner

Right, blackmail is certainly an option. Which sort of fits under the "prank" header although it was for gain rather than giggles.


71 posted on 10/06/2006 3:15:39 PM PDT by msnimje (Seriously, if it REALLY were a religion of PEACE, would they have to label it as such?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

In order to believe this email exists I am going to have to see two copies of it ..... similar but not identical of course.


72 posted on 10/06/2006 3:15:48 PM PDT by blogblogginaway (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

well it is Jones's email address


73 posted on 10/06/2006 3:17:10 PM PDT by Armigerous ( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

I did call my constitutional lawyer friend who relayed the following:

1) Edmunds's complaint against Kerr would be an issue of privacy, not one of constitutional rights.

2) He would not touch Kerr, who has now globally "outed" a lawyer and a former page, with a ten foot pole.






74 posted on 10/06/2006 3:18:03 PM PDT by practicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

... which is why I immediately thought the lawyer was behind the "prank" claim, whether he's owning up to it or not ... claiming that this was a prank takes care of several potential problems for his client, such as intent to extort, as well as removing any question about his sexuality.


75 posted on 10/06/2006 3:18:19 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

well it is Jones's email address


76 posted on 10/06/2006 3:19:00 PM PDT by Armigerous ( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Armigerous; jrooney
well it is Jones's email address

That's easy to spoof. What I'd need to see is the full header.

What email program are you viewing the email in? Can you check under the Edit or View menu and see if there's an option to view full or long headers? That will tell us where it was really sent from.

77 posted on 10/06/2006 3:19:54 PM PDT by libravoter (Live from the People's Republic of Cambridge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: libravoter

I copied the email off Wild Bill's website Passionate America...ask him


78 posted on 10/06/2006 3:21:52 PM PDT by Armigerous ( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Armigerous
"alleged Ims"

Whoa! Jones is calling them ALLEGED IM's?????
79 posted on 10/06/2006 3:23:20 PM PDT by blogblogginaway (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Is this Stephen Jones the same brilliant lawyer who so ably represented McVay(spelling unknown)?


80 posted on 10/06/2006 3:24:32 PM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson